Article

Frequency and Spatial Distribution of Cartilage Thickness Change in Knee Osteoarthritis and its Relation to Clinical and Radiographic Covariates - Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

StatAnswers Consulting LLC, San Diego, CA. Electronic address: .
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage (Impact Factor: 4.66). 10/2012; 21(1). DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.10.010
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: Estimate the frequency and spatial location of rapid femorotibial cartilage thinning or thickening in knees with, or at risk of, osteoarthritis and examine their association with clinical and radiographic covariates. DESIGN: Knee cartilage thickness change over 12 months was measured using magnetic resonance imaging in the right knee of 757 Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) participants that had radiographic findings of osteophytes or joint space narrowing. Thickness changes in individual knees were classified as having rapid thinning or thickening or no detectable OA-related change when compared to asymptomatic OAI Control cohort knees. RESULTS: Cartilage thinning, found in 18.5% of subjects, was more frequent in knees with OAI calculated Kellgren-Lawrence Grade (cKLG)>2 (p<0.001) and with frequent pain (p=0.047). No link was found between body mass index, sex, and age and cartilage thinning (p>0.15). The percent of knees with thickening was small (4.4%), but greater in knees with frequent pain (p=0.02). Rapid thinning was most common in the central (36.4%) and external (32.1%) subregions of the medial weight-bearing femur. Mean cartilage loss in rapidly thinning subregions ranged from 11.2%/y to 24.6%/y. Knees with cKLG>2, but classified as having no detectable OA-related change had mean cartilage loss rates significantly >0 (0.4%/y to 1.3%/y) in 10 subregions. CONCLUSION: Most observed subregional changes in OA knees were indistinguishable from changes found in an asymptomatic cohort, but a fraction of subregions showed rapid progression. The relative frequency of rapid thinning increases when cKLG>2, a classification closely associated with joint space narrowing and/or frequent knee pain are present.

0 Followers
 · 
48 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent joint disorder with no approved disease-modifying treatment available. The importance of imaging in assessing all joint structures involved in the disease process, including articular cartilage, meniscus, subarticular bone marrow, and synovium for diagnosis, prognostication, and follow-up, has been well recognized. In daily clinical practice, conventional radiography is still the most commonly used imaging technique for the evaluation of a patient with known or suspected OA and radiographic outcome measures are still the only approved end point by regulatory authorities in clinical trials. The ability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to visualize all joint structures in three-dimensional fashion including tissue ultrastructure has markedly deepened our understanding of the natural history of the disease. This article describes the roles and limitations of different imaging modalities for clinical practice and research in OA, with a focus on radiography and MRI and an emphasis on the knee joint.
    Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology 02/2014; 28(1):31-60. DOI:10.1016/j.berh.2014.02.002 · 3.06 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) is a multicentre, prospective, observational, cohort study of knee osteoarthritis (OA) that began recruitment in 2004. The OAI provides public access to clinical and image data, enabling researchers to examine risk factors/predictors and the natural history of knee OA incidence and progression, and the qualification of imaging and other biomarkers. In this narrative review, we report imaging findings and lessons learned 10 years after enrolment has started. A literature search for full text articles published from the OAI was performed up to 31 December 2013 using Pubmed and the OAI web page.We summarise the rationale, design and imaging protocol of the OAI, and the history of OAI publications. We review studies from early partial, and later full OAI public data releases. The latter are structured by imaging method and tissue, reviewing radiography and then MRI findings on cartilage morphology, cartilage lesions and composition (T2), bone, meniscus, muscle and adipose tissue. Finally, analyses directly comparing findings from MRI and radiography are summarised. Ten years after the first participants were enrolled and first papers published, the OAI has become an invaluable resource to the OA research community. It has fuelled novel methodological approaches of analysing images, and has provided a wealth of information on OA pathophysiology. Continued collection and public release of long-term observations will help imaging measures to gain scientific and regulatory acceptance as 'prognostic' or 'efficacy of intervention' biomarkers, potentially enabling shorter and more efficient clinical trials that can test structure-modifying therapeutic interventions (NCT00080171).
    Annals of the rheumatic diseases 04/2014; 73(7). DOI:10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205310 · 9.27 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the thickness of cartilage at the posterior aspect of the medial and lateral condyle in Osteoarthritis (OA) knees compared to non-OA knees using computed tomography arthrography (CTA). 535 consecutive knee CTAs (mean patient age = 48.7 ± 16.0; 286 males), were retrospectively analyzed. Knees were radiographically classified into OA or non-OA knees according to a modified Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grading scheme. Cartilage thickness at the posterior aspect of the medial and lateral femoral condyles was measured on sagittal reformations, and compared between matched OA and non-OA knees in the whole sample population and in subgroups defined by gender and age. The cartilage of the posterior aspect of medial condyle was statistically significantly thicker in OA knees (2.43 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.36, 2.51)) compared to non-OA knees (2.13 mm (95%CI = 2.02, 2.17)) in the entire sample population (P < 0.001), as well as for all subgroups of patients over 40 years old (all P ≤ 0.01), except for females above 60 years old (P = 0.07). Increase in cartilage thickness at the posterior aspect of the medial condyle was associated with increasing K/L grade in the entire sample population, as well as for males and females separately (regression coefficient = 0.10-0.12, all P < 0.001). For the lateral condyle, there was no statistically significant association between cartilage thickness and OA (either presence of OA or K/L grade). Cartilage thickness at the non-weight-bearing posterior aspect of the medial condyle, but not of the lateral condyle, was increased in OA knees compared to non-OA knees. Furthermore, cartilage thickness at the posterior aspect of the medial condyle increased with increasing K/L grade. Copyright © 2014 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 11/2014; 23(2). DOI:10.1016/j.joca.2014.08.017 · 4.66 Impact Factor