Motor Nerve Transfers to Restore Extrinsic Median Nerve Function: Case Report

Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Washington University, 660 S Euclid, Campus Box 8238, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Hand 10/2008; 4(1):92-7. DOI: 10.1007/s11552-008-9128-9
Source: PubMed


Active pronation is important for many activities of daily living. Loss of median nerve function including pronation is a rare sequela of humerus fracture. Tendon transfers to restore pronation are reserved for the obstetrical brachial plexus palsy patient. Transfer of expendable motor nerves is a treatment modality that can be used to restore active pronation. Nerve transfers are advantageous in that they do not require prolonged immobilization postoperatively, avoid operating within the zone of injury, reinnervate muscles in their native location prior to degeneration of the motor end plates, and result in minimal donor deficit. We report a case of lost median nerve function after a humerus fracture. Pronation was restored with transfer of the extensor carpi radialis brevis branch of the radial nerve to the pronator teres branch of the median nerve. Anterior interosseous nerve function was restored with transfer of the supinator branch to the anterior interosseous nerve. Clinically evident motor function was seen at 4 months postoperatively and continued to improve for the following 18 months. The patient has 4+/5 pronator teres, 4+/5 flexor pollicis longus, and 4-/5 index finger flexor digitorum profundus function. The transfer of the extensor carpi radialis brevis branch of the radial nerve to the pronator teres and supinator branch of the radial nerve to the anterior interosseous nerve is a novel, previously unreported method to restore extrinsic median nerve function.

17 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Peripheral nerve injuries can result in devastating numbness and paralysis. Surgical repair strategies have historically focused on restoring the original anatomy with interposition grafts. Distal nerve transfers are becoming a more common strategy in the repair of nerve deficits as these interventions can restore function in months as opposed to more than a year with nerve grafts. The changes that take place over time in the cell body, distal nerve, and target organ after axotomy can compromise the results of traditional graft placement and may at times be better addressed with the use of distal nerve transfers. A carefully devised nerve transfer offers restoration of function with minimal (if any) detectable deficits at the donor site. A new understanding of cortical plasticity along with patient reeducation allow for good return of strength and function after nerve transfer.
    Neurosurgical FOCUS 03/2009; 26(2):E12. DOI:10.3171/FOC.2009.26.2.E12 · 2.11 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article provides an update of the current strategies of motor and sensory nerve transfers for peripheral nerve lesions of the upper extremity. Indications, techniques, and outcomes are summarized for both well-established transfers used in the management of proximal and brachial plexus injuries as well as those more recently developed for more distal and isolated nerve injuries in the forearm and hand.
    The Journal of hand surgery 02/2010; 35(2):332-41. DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.12.002 · 1.67 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In lower lesions of the brachial plexus (C8-T1) there is good function of the shoulder, elbow, and wrist, although that of the hand is impaired. Reconstruction of finger flexion is generally obtained by tendon transfer. We present a case report involving transfer of the motor nerve branch of the brachioradialis muscle to the anterior interosseous nerve to restore finger flexion in acute lower brachial plexus lesion. (J Hand Surg 2011;36A:394-397. Copyright (C) 2011 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. All rights reserved.)
    The Journal of hand surgery 03/2011; 36(3):394-7. DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.11.030 · 1.67 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications


17 Reads
Available from