Psychometric Testing of the Chinese Quality of Recovery Score

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong. .h
Anesthesia and analgesia (Impact Factor: 3.47). 11/2008; 107(4):1189-95. DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318184b94e
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We evaluated a Chinese translation of the quality of recovery (QoR) score for measuring health status in patients after surgery and anesthesia.
The Chinese QoR score was developed by a panel of linguistic experts using a series of forward and backward translations. We then compared the psychometric performance of the Chinese QoR score with the original English version in bilingual Chinese patients undergoing a variety of surgeries. Using a crossover design, 210 patients were randomly assigned to complete both versions of the QoR score, 1 h apart, in the morning after surgery according to one of the two sequences: Chinese followed by the English QoR score or the reverse order. Test-retest and interrater reliabilities were calculated by comparing scores administered 6-8 h later and those completed by the patients and duty nurses, respectively.
Patient responses to the Chinese QoR score agreed well with the English version (weighted kappa statistic, kappaw=0.92). Both QoR scores correlated with patient satisfaction scores (Chinese version, rho=0.82; English version, rho=0.79) confirming convergent validity. There was also significant negative correlation between the QoR scores and female gender, duration of hospital stay, or magnitude of surgery (discriminant construct validity). We found the Chinese QoR score has good internal consistency (Cronbach's rho=0.91), interobserver (kappaw=0.77), and test-retest reliability (kappaw=0.83). These values were similar to those of the original English version (Cronbach's rho=0.89, interobserver kappaw=0.84, test-retest reliability kappaw=0.88).
The Chinese QoR score is conceptually, semantically, and operationally equivalent to the English version. Both scales provide valid, reliable, and responsive assessment of the QoR after surgery and anesthesia.

1 Follower
20 Reads
  • Source
    • "The primary outcome measure was the postoperative pain at rest assessed by NRS at 0.5 h post-operatively. The secondary outcome measures were the summed pain intensities at rest, time to PACU discharge defined as the time to achieve a modified Aldrete score of 9, the incidence of shivering, the incidence of early (0 to 2 h) and later (2 to 24 h) post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and post-operative quality of recovery determined by Quality of Recovery score 40 [QoR-40, which contains five general domains: physical comfort (12 items), emotional state (9 items), physical independence (5 items), psychologic support (7 items) and pain (7 items)] (Myles et al., 2000; Chan et al., 2008) at 24 h after surgery. The duration of surgery (from incision to dressing), intraoperative hemodynamic values including heart rate and mean arterial pressure every 5 min within the first 30 min after induction and within the last 30 min before dressing, intraoperative fluid application, total intraoperative relaxants and intraoperative remifentanil doses were also recorded. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Studies have suggested that 5-hydroxytryptamine-3A (5-HT-3A) receptor antagonists may have analgesic effects. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, factorial study tested the hypothesis that 5-HT-3A receptor antagonist tropisetron attenuates post-operative pain in women receiving either sevoflurane or propofol based anaesthesia. Two hundred and ninety-six women undergoing gynaecological laparoscopies were randomly assigned to be anaesthetized with either sevoflurane or propofol. Immediately after the induction of anaesthesia, the anaesthesiologist administered either tropisetron 2 mg or a placebo intravenously. Pain score at rest at 0.5 h post-operatively reported using a numerical rating scale was the primary outcome measure. The secondary outcome measures included pain score at rest every 2 h within the first 24 h post-operatively, duration of post-anaesthesia care unit stay, incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting, the incidence of shivering and score of the Quality of Recovery Score 40. Compared with placebo, tropisetron produced a statistically significant decrease on pain report within the first 6 h post-operatively in the sevoflurane-based anaesthesia group (3 [2, 4] vs. 5 [4, 5], p < 0.001 in 0.5 h; 2 [0, 4] vs. 3 [3, 5], p < 0.001 in 2 h; 2 [0, 3] vs. 3 [1, 4], p = 0.002 in 4 h; 1 [0, 3] vs. 2 [1, 4], p = 0.016 in 6 h), but not in the propofol-based group. A single-dose intravenous administration of tropisetron after anaesthesia induction is associated with statistically significant decreased early post-operative pain in patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopies under sevoflurane based general anaesthesia.
    European journal of pain (London, England) 02/2014; 18(2). DOI:10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00365.x · 2.93 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Paravertebral block (PVB) has the potential to reduce postoperative pain after breast surgery. The aim of the study was to investigate whether PVB performed immediately before surgery could affect the postoperative morbidities in terms of pain and emesis, and improve the quality of recovery (QoR) in patients after surgery for breast cancer. Postoperative data were collected prospectively from two groups of patients undergoing unilateral breast surgery during the study period of 1 month. Forty consecutive patients received either solely general anesthesia (GA group, n=25) or GA plus ultrasound-guided PVB (GA+PVB group, n=15) for the surgery. Pain scores and areal distribution of pain were compared between the two groups 1 hour and 6 hours postoperatively and on the midmorning of postoperative Day 1 (POD1). The QoR scores were compared between the two groups 6 hours postoperatively and on the midmorning of POD1. Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and doses of analgesics and narcotics given were also compared. Pain scores at rest were significantly lower in the GA+PVB group at all designated time points [1 hour (p<0.0001), 6 hours (p<0.0001), and on midmorning of POD1 (p=0.041)]. Pain scores with movements was also significantly lower at all time points in the GA+PVB group (1 hour, p<0.0001; 6 hours, p<0.0001; midmorning of POD1, p=0.0012). Areal distribution of pain at rest and with movement was wider in the GA group 1 hour and 6 hours postoperately but was identical to that of GA+ PVB group on the mid-morning of POD1 [1 hour postoperatively at rest (p<0.0001), with movement (p<0.0001); 6 hours postoperatively at rest (p=0.0018), with movement (p=0.0048)]. The QoR scores were significantly higher in the GA+PVB group at 6 hours (p<0.0001) and on midmorning of POD1 (p=0.0079). The incidences of postoperative nausea and vomiting were significantly lower in the GA+PVB group (p=0.0004). Doses of postoperative analgesics and narcotics were significantly less in the GA+PVB group (p<0.0001 and p=0.001, respectively). Time to first request for analgesics was significantly longer in the GA+PVB group (p=0.0002). PVB given before surgery in combination with GA could provide better postoperative analgesia and better QoR than did GA alone in patients undergoing surgery for unilateral breast cancer.
    09/2011; 49(3):91-5. DOI:10.1016/j.aat.2011.08.006
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Previous clinical trials and animal experiments have suggested that long-lasting neurotoxicity of general anesthetics may lead to postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). Brain function monitoring such as the bispectral index (BIS) facilitates anesthetic titration and has been shown to reduce anesthetic exposure. In a randomized controlled trial, we tested the effect of BIS monitoring on POCD in 921 elderly patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either BIS-guided anesthesia or routine care. The BIS group had anesthesia adjusted to maintain a BIS value between 40 and 60 during maintenance of anesthesia. Routine care group had BIS measured but not revealed to attending anesthesiologists. Anesthesia was adjusted according to traditional clinical signs and hemodynamic parameters. A neuropsychology battery of tests was administered before and at 1 week and 3 months after surgery. Results were compared with matched control patients who did not have surgery during the same period. Delirium was measured using the confusion assessment method criteria. Results: The median (interquartile range) BIS values during the maintenance period of anesthesia were significantly lower in the control group, 36 (31 to 49), compared with the BIS-guided group, 53 (48 to 57), P<0.001. BIS-guided anesthesia reduced propofol delivery by 21% and that for volatile anesthetics by 30%. There were fewer patients with delirium in the BIS group compared with routine care (15.6% vs. 24.1%, P=0.01). Although cognitive performance was similar between groups at 1 week after surgery, patients in the BIS group had a lower rate of POCD at 3 months compared with routine care (10.2% vs. 14.7%; adjusted odds ratio 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.98; P=0.025). Conclusions: BIS-guided anesthesia reduced anesthetic exposure and decreased the risk of POCD at 3 months after surgery. For every 1000 elderly patients undergoing major surgery, anesthetic delivery titrated to a range of BIS between 40 and 60 would prevent 23 patients from POCD and 83 patients from delirium.
    Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology 09/2012; 25(1). DOI:10.1097/ANA.0b013e3182712fba · 2.99 Impact Factor
Show more


20 Reads