A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Primary Anastomosis or Hartmann's Procedure for Perforated Left Colonic Diverticulitis With Purulent or Fecal Peritonitis

*Department of Surgery University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland §Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland †Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital, Chur, Switzerland ‡Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Annals of surgery (Impact Factor: 8.33). 11/2012; 256(5):819-27. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827324ba
Source: PubMed


: To evaluate the outcome after Hartmann's procedure (HP) versus primary anastomosis (PA) with diverting ileostomy for perforated left-sided diverticulitis.
: The surgical management of left-sided colonic perforation with purulent or fecal peritonitis remains controversial. PA with ileostomy seems to be superior to HP; however, results in the literature are affected by a significant selection bias. No randomized clinical trial has yet compared the 2 procedures.
: Sixty-two patients with acute left-sided colonic perforation (Hinchey III and IV) from 4 centers were randomized to HP (n = 30) and to PA (with diverting ileostomy, n = 32), with a planned stoma reversal operation after 3 months in both groups. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary end point was the overall complication rate. The study was discontinued following an interim analysis that found significant differences of relevant secondary end points as well as a decreasing accrual rate (NCT01233713).
: Patient demographics were equally distributed in both groups (Hinchey III: 76% vs 75% and Hinchey IV: 24% vs 25%, for HP vs PA, respectively). The overall complication rate for both resection and stoma reversal operations was comparable (80% vs 84%, P = 0.813). Although the outcome after the initial colon resection did not show any significant differences (mortality 13% vs 9% and morbidity 67% vs 75% in HP vs PA), the stoma reversal rate after PA with diverting ileostomy was higher (90% vs 57%, P = 0.005) and serious complications (Grades IIIb-IV: 0% vs 20%, P = 0.046), operating time (73 minutes vs 183 minutes, P < 0.001), hospital stay (6 days vs 9 days, P = 0.016), and lower in-hospital costs (US $16,717 vs US $24,014) were significantly reduced in the PA group.
: This is the first randomized clinical trial favoring PA with diverting ileostomy over HP in patients with perforated diverticulitis.

Download full-text


Available from: Christian Eugen Oberkofler,
  • Source
    • "The first randomized trial of Hartmann's procedure vs. primary anastomosis with ileostomy in patients with diffuse disease was published by Oberkofler et al. in 2012. It reported no difference in initial mortality, but a reduction in length of stay, lower costs, fewer serious complications and greater stoma reversal rates in the primary anastomosis group [56]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Computed tomography (CT) imaging is the most appropriate diagnostic tool to confirm suspected left colonic diverticulitis. However, the utility of CT imaging goes beyond accurate diagnosis of diverticulitis; the grade of severity on CT imaging may drive treatment planning of patients presenting with acute diverticulitis. The appropriate management of left colon acute diverticulitis remains still debated because of the vast spectrum of clinical presentations and different approaches to treatment proposed. The authors present a new simple classification system based on both CT scan results driving decisions making management of acute diverticulitis that may be universally accepted for day to day practice.
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery 02/2015; 10(3). DOI:10.1186/1749-7922-10-3 · 1.47 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Standard procedures for purulent or fecal peritonitis (Hinchey III and IV) consist of Hartmann’s procedure or colonic resection with primary anastomosis in the acute phase, with or without protective ileostomy formation [3]. Outcomes are amendable with about 10 per cent of patients showing stoma-related complications following Hartmann’s procedure and up to 14 per cent of patients showing anastomotic leakages following primary anastomosis [2]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The combination of perforated diverticulitis in a lumbar hernia constitutes an extremely rare condition. Case presentation We report a case of a 66 year old Caucasian woman presenting with perforated sigmoid diverticulitis localized in a lumbar hernia following iliac crest bone graft performed 18 years ago. Emergency treatment consisted of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage. Elective sigmoid resection was scheduled four months later. At the same time a laparoscopic hernia repair with a biologic mesh graft was performed. Conclusion This case shows a very seldom clinical presentation of lumbar hernia. Secondary colonic resection and concurrent hernia repair with a biologic implant have proven useful in treating this rare condition.
    BMC Surgery 07/2014; 14(1):46. DOI:10.1186/1471-2482-14-46 · 1.40 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Perforated colonic diverticulitis is treated by surgical intervention . The standard treatment is the Hartmann procedure (resection of the diverticula affected colonic segment, closure of the rectal stump, and formation of an end colostomy [6]). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Severe stages of acute, colonic diverticulitis can progress into intestinal perforations with peritonitis. In such cases, urgent treatment is needed, and Hartmann's procedure is the standard treatment for cases with fecal peritonitis. Peritoneal lavage may be an alternative to resection for acute diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis, but ongoing randomized trials are awaited to clarify this.
    BioMed Research International 06/2014; 2014(1):380607. DOI:10.1155/2014/380607 · 1.58 Impact Factor
Show more