Article

Advance directives in nursing homes: prevalence, validity, significance, and nursing staff adherence.

Institute of General Practice, Düsseldorf University Hospital.
Deutsches Ärzteblatt International (Impact Factor: 3.61). 09/2012; 109(37):577-83. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0577
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The German Advance Directives Act of 2009 confirms that advance directives (ADs) are binding. Little is known, however, about their prevalence in nursing homes, their quality, and whether they are honored.
In 2007, we carried out a cross-sectional survey in all 11 nursing homes of a German city in the state of North Rhine-Westphalia (total nursing home population, 1089 residents). The ADs were formally analyzed and assessed by 3 raters with respect to 5 clinical decision-making scenarios. The specifications of the ADs were compared with what the nurses reported that they would do in each scenario.
11% of the nursing home residents had a personal AD, and a further 1.4% an AD by proxy. 52% of the 119 ADs that we analyzed contained no documentation of the patient's decision-making capacity and/or voluntariness, and only 3% contained documentation of a medical consultation. Most ADs failed to state what should be done in case the patient acutely became incapable of consenting to treatment (inter-rater agreement [IRA] >83%). For the case of permanent decisional incapacity, many ADs contained ambiguous information (IRA<43%). 23 directives stated that the patient should not have cardiopulmonary resuscitation in case an arrest occurred in the patient's current clinical condition, but the nurses reported a corresponding do-not-resuscitate agreement for only 9 of these 23 patients.
In 2007, ADs were rare in these German nursing homes, and most of the existing ones were invalid, of little meaning, and/or disregarded by the nursing staff. There is little reason to believe that the Advance Directives Act of 2009 will bring about any major change in this miserable status quo. Advance care planning, a system-oriented concept still uncommon in Germany, could give new impulses to promote a cultural change in this respect.

1 Follower
 · 
196 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: After the law on living will was released in 2009 in Germany, an increased use of advance directives was observed. Since patients with kidney diseases are facing the potential or real need for expensive and invasive renal replacement therapy, one could speculate that they will either less or even more frequently state an advance directive than patients with other diseases. Methods: A structured interviewing was performed of all patients on a nephrology ward where also patients with other general medical conditions are treated. The study was approved by our local ethics committee (protocol # 303/08). All admitted patients were successively included who could give signed consent. The investigation was performed between July 2009 and April 2010 by a single interviewer (FD). Results: Among 505 admitted patients, 211 were included but 11 patients did not consent to the investigation. Of the 200 investigated patients, 121 had a renal diagnosis and 79 other medical diseases. Compared to other European studies, the frequency of advance directives was high (26 %), underlining its clinical relevance. Upon multivariate logistic regression analysis the odds ratio (95 % confidence interval, CI) for the presence of an advance directive was significantly increased only by the age (1.06; CI 1.03-1.09; p = 0.001), but not by the underlying diagnosis (1.47; CI 0.72-2.97; p = 0.287). Significantly more patients did forego resuscitation than did dialysis in their living will (16 vs. 4) while the majority was undecided (36 vs. 47; p = 0.01). Conclusion: Age was found the more impacting variable than the renal diagnosis on the prevalence of advance directives. Patients with a renal diagnosis should be encouraged to make a statement on dialysis in their living will.
    DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 03/2014; 139(13):633-7. DOI:10.1055/s-0034-1369881 · 0.55 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives To describe Chinese nursing home residents' knowledge of advance directive (AD) and end-of-life care preferences and to explore the predictors of their preference for AD. Design Population-based cross-sectional survey. Settings Nursing homes (n = 31) in Wuhan, Mainland Southern China. Participants Cognitively intact nursing home residents (n = 467) older than 60 years. Measures Face-to-face questionnaire interviews were used to collect information on demographics, chronic diseases, life-sustaining treatment, AD, and other end-of-life care preferences. Results Most (95.3%) had never heard of AD, and fewer than one-third (31.5%) preferred to make an AD. More than half (52.5%) would receive life-sustaining treatment if they sustained a life-threatening condition. Fewer than one-half (43.3%) chose doctors as the surrogate decision maker about life-sustaining treatment, whereas most (78.8%) nominated their eldest son or daughter as their proxy. More than half (58.2%) wanted to live and die in their present nursing homes. The significant independent predictors of AD preference included having heard of AD before (odds ratio [OR] 9.323), having definite answers of receiving (OR 3.433) or rejecting (OR 2.530) life-sustaining treatment, and higher Cumulative Illness Rating Scale score (OR 1.098). Conclusions Most nursing home residents did not know about AD, and nearly one-third showed positive attitudes toward it. AD should be promoted in mainland China. Education of residents, the proxy decision maker, and nursing home staff on AD is very important. Necessary policy support, legislation, or practice guidelines about AD should be made with flexibility to respect nursing home residents' rights in mainland China.
    Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 10/2014; 15(10). DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2014.06.006 · 4.78 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Advance Care Planning (ACP) is a systematic approach to ensure that effective advance directives (ADs) are developed and respected. We studied the effects of implementing a regional ACP program in Germany. Methods: In a prospective, inter-regionally controlled trial focusing on nursing homes (n/hs), we compared the number, relevance and validity of new ADs completed in the intervention region versus the control region. Intervention n/h residents and their families were offered professional facilitation including standardized documentation. Results: Data from 136 residents of three intervention n/hs were compared with data from 439 residents of 10 control n/hs over a study period of 16.5 months. In the intervention region, 49 (36.0%) participating residents completed a new AD over the period of the study, compared to 18 (4.1%) in the control region; these ADs included 30 ADs by proxy in the intervention region versus 10 in the control region. Proxies were designated in 94.7% versus 50.0% of cases, the AD was signed by a physician in 93.9% versus 16.7%, and an emergency order was included in 98.0% versus 44.4%. Resuscitation status was addressed in 95.9% versus 38.9% of cases (p<0.01 for all of the differences mentioned above). In the intervention region, new ADs were preceded by an average of 2.5 facilitated conversations (range, 2-5) with a mean total duration of 100 minutes (range, 60-240 minutes). Conclusion: The implementation of an ACP program in German nursing homes led, much more frequently than previously reported, to the creation of advance directives with potential relevance to medical decision-making. Future research should assess the effect of such programs on clinical and structural outcomes.
    Deutsches Ärzteblatt International 01/2014; 111(4):50-7. DOI:10.3238/arztebl.2014.0050 · 3.61 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
54 Downloads
Available from
May 30, 2014