The development of the Mental Health Confidence Scale: A measure of self-efficacy in individuals diagnosed with mental disorders.

Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal (Impact Factor: 1.16). 10/2012; DOI: 10.1037/h0095162

ABSTRACT This article discusses a new scale for the measurement of self-efficacy among persons dealing with mental disorders and examines the relationship between involvement in self-help and self-efficacy. The Mental Health Confidence Scale scale is based on theories of self-efficacy and recent qualitative research on self-help groups. It is designed to assess the self-efficacy beliefs of persons dealing with mental disorders, particularly how confident they are about their ability to deal with those things that commonly influence their lives. The presumed 3-factor structure of the scale (optimism, coping, advocacy) was tested using data from a study on understanding factors associated with participation and nonparticipation in mental health self-help groups; Ss were 554 self-help group participants, mean age 42 yrs. Results of confirmatory factor analyses support the 3-factor structure and suggest that the scale is a reliable means of assessing mental health related efficacy beliefs. In correlational analyses, generally positive associations were found between participation in self-help and self-efficacy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Online psychotherapy is clinically effective yet why, how, and for whom the effects are greatest remain largely unknown. In the present study, we examined whether mental health self-efficacy (MHSE), a construct derived from Bandura¿s Social Learning Theory (SLT), influenced symptom and functional outcomes of a new mobile phone and web-based psychotherapy intervention for people with mild-to-moderate depression, anxiety and stress.MethodsSTUDY I: Data from 49 people with symptoms of depression, anxiety and/or stress in the mild-to-moderate range were used to examine the reliability and construct validity of a new measure of MHSE, the Mental Health Self-efficacy Scale (MHSES).
    BMC Psychiatry 09/2014; 14(1):272. DOI:10.1186/s12888-014-0272-1 · 2.24 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Individual cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis (CBTp) is a recommended treatment in the acute phase and beyond. However, less is known about the effectiveness of group CBTp in acute care. This mixed methods study explored the implementation and effectiveness of brief group CBTp with inpatients. This prospective trial compared inpatients who received either a four week group CBTp program or treatment as usual (TAU). Participants (n = 113 at baseline) completed self-report measures of distress, confidence and symptoms of psychosis at baseline, post-intervention and one month follow up. CBTp group participants also completed a brief open-ended satisfaction questionnaire. Using complete case analysis participants who received CBTp showed significantly reduced distress at follow up compared to TAU and significantly increased confidence across the study and follow up period. However, these effects were not demonstrated using a more conservative intention-to-treat analysis. Qualitative analysis of the satisfaction data revealed positive feedback with a number of specific themes. The study suggests that brief group CBTp with inpatients may improve confidence and reduce distress in the longer term. Participants report that the groups are acceptable and helpful. However, given the methodological limitations involved in this ‘real world’ study more robust evidence is needed.
    Behaviour Research and Therapy 12/2014; 65. DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2014.12.008 · 3.85 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study summarizes the results of a 10 year longitudinal study of individual recovery progress within a residential program based upon therapeutic community principles and a Seven Domains Enhanced Recovery Model that emerged from a grounded theory analysis of real life recovery experiences (Young and Ensing, Psychiatr Rehab J 22:219-231, 1999). The four primary hypotheses of the study predicted significant and moderately sized effect sizes on a holistic set of measures, corresponding to the Enhanced Recovery Model. Results indicate support for all hypotheses; statistically significant and moderate to large effects were found in all domain measures for the participants, most of whom had multiple unsuccessful previous treatment attempts. These results indicate that this theoretical structure and residential model is effective in supporting recovery for individuals with complex and persistent challenges across the broad range of recovery domains. Conceptually, this also adds quantitative support for the Seven Domains Enhanced Recovery Model, complementing previous qualitative studies.
    Psychiatric Quarterly 03/2014; 85(3). DOI:10.1007/s11126-014-9292-8 · 1.26 Impact Factor


Available from
Jun 4, 2014