Article

Subtle renal duplication as an unrecognized cause of childhood incontinence: diagnosis by magnetic resonance urography.

Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, Box 0628, M-372, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Journal of pediatric urology (Impact Factor: 1.41). 11/2008; 4(5):398-400. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2008.01.213
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Urinary incontinence in young girls who have been toilet trained may be due to an ectopic ureter inserting below the urinary sphincter. This diagnosis is frequently delayed, is psychologically distressing, and may be missed at physical examination. Findings at ultrasound evaluation may be subtle and imaging with computed tomography or intravenous urography exposes young patients to ionizing radiation. We report two cases of girls with urinary incontinence where magnetic resonance (MR) urography revealed subtle renal duplication which implied the presence of an ectopic duplicated ureter with infrasphincteric insertion. These cases stress the importance of examining the kidneys, rather than the perineum, at MR, ultrasound and intravenous urogram evaluation, and show the value of MR urography as a safe alternative to computed tomography and intravenous urography for making this diagnosis.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Jafi Alyssa Lipson, Jul 29, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
87 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We present the case of ureteral triplication with vesicoureteral reflux into the lowest and middle pole in a 5-year-old girl. Magnetic resonance (MR) nephrography depicted loss of function of the lowest pole, which could not be assessed through MAG3 renal scan. Morphologic analyses revealed organ structure and vascular anatomy in superior quality. A laparoscopic partial nephroureterectomy of the lower pole was performed. Intraoperative findings correlated exactly with morphologic data obtained through MR nephrography. Dynamic MR nephrography should be considered as diagnostic tool of choice for selected kidney anomalies before surgery.
    Journal of Pediatric Surgery 10/2010; 45(10):2053-7. DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.05.060 · 1.31 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are increasingly valuable tools for assessing the urinary tract in adults and children. However, their imaging capabilities, while overlapping in some respects, should be considered as complementary, as each technique offers specific advantages and disadvantages both in actual inherent qualities of the technique and in specific patients and with a specific diagnostic question. The use of CT and MRI should therefore be tailored to the patient and the clinical question. For the scope of this article, the advantages and disadvantages of these techniques in children will be considered; different considerations will apply in adult practice.
    Pediatric Nephrology 10/2010; 26(1):59-68. DOI:10.1007/s00467-010-1645-4 · 2.88 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with malignant hematologic diseases. Neutrophil (NEUT) and platelet (PLT) counts are used to evaluate hematologic engraftment of transplanted patients. Recent-generation hematology analyzers offer an alternative way to evaluate immature peripheral blood (PB) cell fractions, which may also give an indication of hematopoietic recovery. The immature reticulocyte fraction (IRF) and immature platelet fraction (IPF) in PB samples may provide early indicators of transplant success. We evaluated the predictive value of IRF and IPF for the hematologic recovery of 46 adult patients undergoing allogeneic PB progenitor cell transplantation. We observed that IRF recovery anticipated by 4 days compared with NEUT recovery (11 vs 15 d) and IPF by 2 days compared with PLT (10 vs 12 d). The recovery was different for patients undergoing a nonmyeloablative regimen (NMA); we observed an early IRF recovery by 5 days compared with NEUT (10 vs 15 d) and a IPF compared with PLT recovery by 2 days (9 vs 11 d). We also observed significant correlations between NEUT and PLT recovery with recoveries of the new parameters IRF and IPF. We concluded that IRF and IPF predicted hematopoietic recovery. For allografted patients after NMA regimens, prediction was even more clinically relevant. These immature fractions open new perspectives for monitoring patient transfusion support through the posttransplantation recovery.
    Transplantation Proceedings 01/2011; 43(1):241-3. DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.12.030 · 0.95 Impact Factor
Show more