The kinesin-14 Klp2 is negatively regulated by the SIN for proper spindle elongation and telophase nuclear positioning

Department of Microbiology and Physiological Systems, and Program in Cell Dynamics, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605 Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Cell and Developmental Biology Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37232.
Molecular biology of the cell (Impact Factor: 5.98). 10/2012; 23(23). DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E12-07-0532
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In S. pombe, a late mitotic kinase pathway called the Septation Initiation Network (SIN) triggers cytokinesis. Here, we show that the SIN is also involved in regulating anaphase spindle elongation and telophase nuclear positioning via inhibition of Klp2, a minus end directed kinesin-14. Klp2 is known to localize to microtubules (MTs) and have roles in interphase nuclear positioning, mitotic chromosome alignment, and nuclei migration during karyogamy (nuclear fusion during mating). We observe SIN-dependent disappearance of Klp2 from MTs in anaphase and we have found that this is mediated by direct phosphorylation of Klp2 by the SIN kinase Sid2 which abrogates loading of Klp2 onto MTs by inhibiting its interaction with Mal3 (EB1 homolog). Disruption of Klp2 MT localization is required for efficient anaphase spindle elongation. Furthermore, when cytokinesis is delayed, SIN inhibition of Klp2 acts in concert with microtubules emanating from the equatorial microtubule organizing center to position the nuclei away from the cell division site. These results reveal novel functions of the SIN in regulating the MT cytoskeleton and suggest that the SIN may have broader functions in regulating cellular organization in late mitosis than previously realized.


Available from: Dannel Mccollum, May 30, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Microtubules (MTs) and associated motors play a central role in nuclear migration, which is crucial for diverse biological functions including cell division, polarity, and sexual reproduction. In this paper, we report a dual mechanism underlying nuclear congression during fission yeast karyogamy upon mating of haploid cells. Using microfluidic chambers for long-term imaging, we captured the precise timing of nuclear congression and identified two minus end-directed motors operating in parallel in this process. Kinesin-14 Klp2 associated with MTs may cross-link and slide antiparallel MTs emanating from the two nuclei, whereas dynein accumulating at spindle pole bodies (SPBs) may pull MTs nucleated from the opposite SPB. Klp2-dependent nuclear congression proceeds at constant speed, whereas dynein accumulation results in an increase of nuclear velocity over time. Surprisingly, the light intermediate chain Dli1, but not dynactin, is required for this previously unknown function of dynein. We conclude that efficient nuclear congression depends on the cooperation of two minus end-directed motors. © 2015 Scheffler et al.
    The Journal of Cell Biology 04/2015; 209(1):47-58. DOI:10.1083/jcb.201409087 · 9.69 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In Schizosaccharomyces pombe late mitotic events are coordinated with cytokinesis by the septation initiation network (SIN), an essential spindle pole body (SPB)-associated kinase cascade, which controls the formation, maintenance and constriction of the cytokinetic ring. It is not fully understood how SIN initiation is temporally regulated, but it depends on the activation of the GTPase Spg1 that is inhibited during interphase by the essential bipartite GAP, Byr4-Cdc16. Cells are particularly sensitive to the modulation of Byr4, which undergoes cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation presumed to regulate its function. Polo-like kinase, which promotes SIN activation, is partially responsible for Byr4 phosphorylation. Here, we show that Byr4 is also controlled by Cdk1-mediated phosphorylation. A Cdk1 non-phosphorylatable Byr4 phosphomutant displays severe cell division defects including the formation of elongated, multinucleate cells, failure to maintain the cytokinetic ring and compromised SPB association of the SIN kinase Cdc7. Our analyses reveal that Cdk1-mediated phosphoregulation of Byr4 facilitates complete removal of Byr4 from metaphase SPBs in concert with Plo1, revealing an unexpected role for Cdk1 in promoting cytokinesis through activation of the SIN pathway.
    Molecular Biology of the Cell 06/2014; 25(15). DOI:10.1091/mbc.E14-04-0936 · 4.55 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: NDR (Nuclear Dbf-2 related) kinases constitute key regulatory nodes in signaling networks that control multiple biological processes such as growth, proliferation, mitotic exit, morphogenesis and apoptosis. Two NDR pathways exist in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, called the Septation Initiation Network (SIN) and the Morphogenesis Orb6 Network (MOR). The SIN promotes cytokinesis and the MOR drives cell separation at the end of cytokinesis and polarized growth during interphase. We showed previously that crosstalk exists between these two pathways, with the SIN inhibiting the MOR during cytokinesis through phosphorylation of the MOR component Nak1 by the SIN kinase Sid2. The reason for this inhibition remained uncertain. We show here that failure to inhibit MOR signaling during cytokinesis results in cell lysis at the site of septum formation. Time-lapse analysis revealed that MOR signaling during cytokinesis causes cells to prematurely initiate septum degradation/cell separation. The cell lysis phenotype is due to premature initiation of cell separation because it can be rescued by mutations in genes required for cell separation/septum degradation. We also shed further light on how the SIN inhibits the MOR. Sid2 phosphorylation of the MOR proteins Sog2 and Nak1 is required to prevent cell lysis during cytokinesis. Together these results show that SIN inhibition of the MOR enforces proper temporal ordering of cytokinetic events.
    Eukaryotic Cell 06/2014; 13(8). DOI:10.1128/EC.00129-14 · 3.18 Impact Factor