Effectiveness of 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine on pneumonia in HIV-infected adults in the United States, 1998-2003

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for HIV, Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Vaccine (Impact Factor: 3.49). 10/2008; 26(46):5830-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.08.032
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV-23) has been recommended for HIV-infected adults. We investigated factors that could influence PPV-23 effectiveness against all-cause pneumonia in a longitudinal cohort of 23,255 HIV-infected adults receiving care during 1998--2003. Patients who received PPV-23 had a lower rate of pneumonia (IRR = 0.8; 95% CI: 0.8-0.9) than patients who had never been vaccinated, independent of recent CD4 count, HIV viral load, antiretroviral therapy, and history of pneumonia. However, PPV-23 provided no benefit when patients were vaccinated at HIV viral load > 100,000 copies/ml, irrespective of CD4 count at vaccination. Receipt of PPV-23 was associated with lower incidence of all-cause pneumonia.

  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Long-term antibody responses to 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV) among HIV-infected patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) are rarely investigated. Antibody responses to three pneumococcal capsular polysaccharides [Pneumococcal polysaccharide (PPS) 14, 19F and 23F] were assessed among 169 HIV-infected patients who received HAART and 23-valent PPV. Patients were stratified into four groups according to CD4 count at vaccination: group 1, CD4<100 cells/microL (n=35); group 2, CD4 100-199 cells/microL (n=36); group 3, CD4 200-349 cells/microL (n=34); and group 4, CD4>or=350 cells/microL (n=64). The proportion of patients who achieved increases in antibody titres of twofold or greater from baseline values (responders) was compared among the four groups of patients for five consecutive years after vaccination. The proportion of responders to the three serotypes was significantly lower among patients in group 1 compared with those in the other three groups during yearly follow-up. Much faster loss of antibody responses was observed in group 1, although the rate of decline varied with the serotypes studied in the four groups. Compared with the nonresponders, more responders had CD4 counts >100 cells/microL at vaccination and achieved better virological suppression throughout the 5-year period, while the absolute increases of CD4 cell counts after HAART were not statistically significantly different. Despite continued increases in CD4 cell counts after HAART, the proportion of HIV-infected patients who maintained antibody responses to PPV declined significantly over the 5-year follow-up period, especially among those who had CD4 counts <100 cells/microL at vaccination and who failed to achieve virological suppression.
    HIV Medicine 07/2009; 11(1):54-63. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-1293.2009.00744.x · 3.45 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This review summarizes recent literature addressing immunization in the setting of HIV infection, with a specific focus on emerging evidence that can guide the care of HIV-positive adults. There are few controlled studies on the clinical efficacy and effectiveness of vaccination in HIV-infected adults receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Published data indicate that HAART restores vaccine immunogenicity, improving the rates and persistence of immune responses, while reducing the risk of vaccine-related adverse events. Despite effective HAART, responses remain often suboptimal relative to HIV-negative individuals, although they improve with larger and more frequent vaccine doses. New vaccines are undergoing trial with promising results, including novel formulations against hepatitis B. Studies are also under way to explore the role of human papilloma virus vaccines for the prevention of anal cancer. Protecting HIV-positive patients against vaccine-preventable infections is important now that HAART has restored life expectancy and general well being, and increased the likelihood of HIV-infected patients engaging in exposure-prone activities related to travel, occupation or social interaction. A proactive approach for vaccinating HIV-positive patients also serves an important public health purpose, reducing the pool of susceptible individuals and contributing to the control of prevalent and re-emerging infections.
    Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 11/2009; 23(1):32-8. DOI:10.1097/QCO.0b013e328334fec4 · 5.03 Impact Factor