Distinct Roles of Prefrontal Cortical Subregions in the Iowa Gambling Task

King's College London, Section of Neuroscience and Emotion, Division of Psychological Medicine and Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK.
Cerebral Cortex (Impact Factor: 8.67). 10/2008; 19(5):1134-43. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhn154
Source: PubMed


The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) assesses decision-making under initially ambiguous conditions. Neuropsychological and neuroimaging data suggest, albeit inconsistently, the involvement of numerous prefrontal cortical regions in task performance. To clarify the contributions of different prefrontal regions, we developed and validated a version of the IGT specifically modified for event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. General decision-making in healthy males elicited activation in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Choices from disadvantageous versus advantageous card decks produced activation in the medial frontal gyrus, lateral orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), and insula. Moreover, activation in these regions, along with the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) and secondary somatosensory cortex, was positively associated with task performance. Lateral OFC and pre-SMA activation also showed a significant modulation over time, suggesting a role in learning. Striato-thalamic regions responded to wins more than losses. These results both replicate and add to previous findings and help to reconcile inconsistencies in neuropsychological data. They reveal that deciding advantageously under initially ambiguous conditions may require both continuous and dynamic processes involving both the ventral and dorsal prefrontal cortex.

Download full-text


Available from: Fabrice Jollant,
  • Source
    • "Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2015.09.020i 2.2.2. Iowa Gambling task (IGT) Participants also performed the modified computerized version of the IGT (Bechara et al., 1999) (for details, see Lawrence et al. (2009)). All participants were task-naïve. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Suicidal vulnerability has been related to impaired value-based decision-making and increased sensitivity to social threat, mediated by the prefrontal cortex. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we aimed at replicating these previous findings by measuring brain activation during the Iowa Gambling Task and an emotional faces viewing task. Participants comprised 15 euthymic suicide attempters (history of depression and suicidal behavior) who were compared with 23 euthymic patient controls (history of depression without suicidal history) and 35 healthy controls. The following five model-based regions of interest were investigated: the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), medial (MPFC) and dorsal prefrontal cortex (DPFC). Suicide attempters relative to patient controls showed (1) increased response to angry vs. neutral faces in the left OFC and the VLPFC, as previously reported; (2) increased response to wins vs. losses in the right OFC, DPFC and ACC; (3) decreased response to risky vs. safe choices in the left DPFC; and (4) decreased response to sad vs. neutral faces in the right ACC. This study links impaired valuation processing (here for signals of social threat, sadness and reward) to prefrontal cortex dysfunction in suicide attempters. These long-term deficits may underlie the impaired decision-making and social difficulties found in suicide attempters.
    Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 10/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2015.09.020 · 2.42 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Society for the Study of Addiction Addiction Biology term (high reward), but disadvantageous in the long run (higher punishment); other choices are less attractive in the short term (low reward), but advantageous in the long run (lower punishment). The phase of decision making during the IGT (i.e. to choose among four decks of cards), and especially choosing from risky decks (versus less risky decks), has been shown to be underlined by a complex neurocognitive circuitry encompassing multiple neural systems (Bechara et al. 1999; Bolla et al. 2003; Tanabe et al. 2007; Christakou et al. 2009; Lawrence et al. 2009; Li et al. 2010; Power, Goodyear & Crockford 2012), and with a certain degree of dynamic balance among them (Bechara 2005; Verdejo-Garcia & Bechara 2009). More specifically, according to the somatic marker hypothesis (Damasio 1994; Bechara & Damasio 2005), the elaboration of a decision triggers immediate and future prospects of an option, which are underlined by numerous affective/emotional (somatic) signals that conflict with each other. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to examine the impact of different neural systems on monetary decision making in frequent poker gamblers, who vary in their degree of problem gambling. Fifteen frequent poker players, ranging from non-problem to high-problem gambling, and 15 non-gambler controls were scanned using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while performing the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). During IGT deck selection, between-group fMRI analyses showed that frequent poker gamblers exhibited higher ventral-striatal but lower dorsolateral prefrontal and orbitofrontal activations as compared with controls. Moreover, using functional connectivity analyses, we observed higher ventral-striatal connectivity in poker players, and in regions involved in attentional/motor control (posterior cingulate), visual (occipital gyrus) and auditory (temporal gyrus) processing. In poker gamblers, scores of problem gambling severity were positively associated with ventral-striatal activations and with the connectivity between the ventral-striatum seed and the occipital fusiform gyrus and the middle temporal gyrus. Present results are consistent with findings from recent brain imaging studies showing that gambling disorder is associated with heightened motivational-reward processes during monetary decision making, which may hamper one's ability to moderate his level of monetary risk taking. © 2015 Society for the Study of Addiction.
    Addiction Biology 03/2015; DOI:10.1111/adb.12239 · 5.36 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "N . Zorlu et al . / Psychiatry Research : Neuroimaging 224 ( 2014 ) 42 – 48 46 occipital cortex ( Ernst et al . , 2002 ; Mathews et al . , 2004 ; Bechara and Van der Linden , 2005 ; Lawrence et al . , 2009b ) . Thus , disrup - tion in one region may be compensated for by other intact brain structures ."
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A number of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) studies have reported substantial white matter (WM) abnormalities in alcohol-dependent patients. These studies were usually performed in recovering alcohol-dependent patients who had been abstinent for days to several weeks. The current study was designed to examine WM microstructure and decision-making in a sample of long-term abstinent alcohol-dependent patients. The study included 12 subjects with alcohol dependence who had been abstinent for at least 6 months before testing and scanning and 13 healthy control subjects. The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) was used to measure decision-making. We found that the long-term abstinent alcohol-dependent group had significantly higher radial and axial diffusivity (RD and AD, respectively) values in frontal, temporal and parietal WM than was found in the healthy control group despite showing no difference in fractional anisotropy (FA) values in comparison to controls. In conclusion, we found widespread WM changes in long-term abstinent alcohol-dependent patients compared with healthy controls. Our findings suggested that AD and RD should be included in analyses of DTI data in addition to the more commonly studied FA. In the current study, FA values of the detoxified alcoholics had recovered and were comparable to those of the controls, whereas significant changes in AD and RD were still observed in some clusters in the frontal, parietal and temporal lobes of detoxified alcoholics even after 27.8 months.
    Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 10/2014; 224(1). DOI:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2014.07.006 · 2.42 Impact Factor
Show more