Hostile and Benevolent Sexism Measuring Ambivalent Sexist Attitudes Toward Women

University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst Center, Massachusetts, United States
Psychology of Women Quarterly (Impact Factor: 2.12). 02/1997; 21(1):119-135. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.x


Presents a theory of sexism as ambivalence, not just hostility, toward women. Ambivalent Sexism Theory distinguishes between hostile and "benevolent" sexism (each addresses issues of power, gender differentiation, and sexuality). Benevolent sexism encompasses subjectively positive attitudes toward women in traditional roles: protective paternalism, idealization of women, and desire for intimate relations. Hostile sexism encompasses the negative equivalents on each dimension: dominative paternalism, derogatory beliefs, and heterosexual hostility. It is argued that both forms of sexism serve to justify and maintain patriarchy and traditional gender roles. The validity of a measure of these constructs, the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI), is reviewed. Comparisons are offered between the ASI and other frequently used scales of attitudes toward women, with suggestions for the proper domains of different scales. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

Download full-text


Available from: Peter Glick, Jan 27, 2014

Click to see the full-text of:

Article: Hostile and Benevolent Sexism Measuring Ambivalent Sexist Attitudes Toward Women

1.04 MB

See full-text
    • "Hostile sexism is defined as " antipathy toward women who are viewed as usurping men's power " and benevolent sexism as " a subjectively favorable, chivalrous ideology which offers protection and affection to women who embrace conventional roles " (Glick & Fiske, 2001, p. 109). Both forms of sexism serve to justify and maintain patriarchy and traditional gender norms (Glick & Fiske, 1997, 2011). Benevolent and hostile sexism are proposed to have three subcomponents, namely power, gender differentiation, and sexuality (Glick & Fiske, 1997). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Alcohol consumption is strongly associated with sexual risk behavior and HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa. This article seeks to explore the role of constructions of masculinity in men's drinking and sexual risk behavior in drinking venues (bars and taverns) in 2 rural villages of North West Province, South Africa. Ten focus groups were conducted with 58 bar patrons and servers. Four focus groups consisted of female bar patrons, 4 consisted of male bar patrons, and 2 consisted of male bar managers and servers. The participants' ages ranged from 18 to 43 years, and they were interviewed using focus group discussion guides with open-ended questions. Key themes identified through thematic analysis were (a) men's high levels of alcohol consumption, (b) men's tendency to blame women for men's proneness to risky sex when drinking, (c) men's sexual objectification of women, and (d) the far-reaching consequences of sexism and violence perpetrated by men. Policies to promote gender equality are needed to ensure that men are more gender-sensitive, engage in more balanced gender relationships, and do not uphold any destructive gender stereotypes.
    Psychology of Men & Masculinity 10/2015; 16(4). DOI:10.1037/a0038871 · 2.08 Impact Factor
    • "Feminists have argued that men utilize rape and sexual assault as a form of social control, which ultimately maintains a patriarchal social order (Brownmiller 1975; Sheffield 1987). As evidence to this assertion, sexist attitudes towards women are related to greater rape myth acceptance (Chapleau et al. 2007; Glick and Fiske 1997) and rape proclivity among British (Masser et al. 2006) and U.S. men (Osland et al. 1996). Moreover, men who hold sexist beliefs are also likely to possess racist attitudes (Sidanius 1993), and racism is associated with increased rape myth acceptance (Aosved and Long 2006). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fredrickson and Roberts (1997) asserted that sexual objectification experiences are likely related to women’s physical safety anxiety; however, to date, very few studies have examined this relationship. Using a sample of 228 U.S. undergraduate women (n = 133 Black/African American; n = 95 White) from a Southeastern university, this study explored the relationships among sexual objectification experiences, physical safety concerns (i.e., perceived risk of crime, fear of crime, and fear of rape), and overall psychological distress. Findings revealed that Black/African American women reported more sexual objectification experiences and fear of crime than White women. Results of a measured variable path analysis suggested that perceived risk of crime fully mediated the relationships between sexual objectification experiences and fear of crime for both groups of women. Moreover, perceived risk of crime fully mediated the relationship between sexual objectification experiences and psychological distress for Black/African American women, but not White women. For White women only, fear of rape partially mediated the relationship between perceived risk of crime and fear of crime, and perceived risk of crime fully mediated the relationship between sexual objectification experiences and fear of rape. Taken together, the results suggest that a sociocultural context that objectifies women and their bodies is related to their sense of safety and security in the world.
    Sex Roles 02/2015; 72(3-4). DOI:10.1007/s11199-014-0444-y · 1.47 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Por outro lado, o paternalismo protetor está associado a uma perspetiva benevolente, na qual os homens são percebidos como protetores das mulheres devido à sua maior autoridade, poder e força física. Este paternalismo protetor é tanto mais evidente quanto maior for a dependência diádica dos homens, por exemplo, da sua esposa, mãe, ou fi lha (Glick & Fiske, 1997). Em contraste, os membros do grupo subordinado tendem a ressentir, de uma forma hostil, o estatuto superior do grupo dominante, o ressentimento do paternalismo (Glick & Fiske, 1999). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A relação entre homens e mulheres é única e composta por desigualdade e preconceito dirigido aos membros do sexo oposto. Enquanto a forma hostil de sexismo foi já muito estudada, o sexismo moderno é caracterizado pela simultaneidade de formas hostis e benevolentes de preconceito, e por isso conceitualizado como Sexismo Ambivalente. O objetivo deste estudo foi adaptar o Inventário de Sexismo Ambivalente (ASI) e o Inventário de Ambivalência em relação aos Homens (AMI) para a população Portuguesa, e avaliar as suas propriedades psicométricas. Ambos os inventários foram administrados a 258 estudantes universitários (31% homens e 69% mulheres), com uma média de idade de 27 anos. As análises fatoriais confirmatórias revelaram evidência da multidimensionalidade de ambos os inventários, validade fatorial, convergente e discriminante, e fiabilidade interna. Os homens revelaram níveis mais elevados de hostilidade e de benevolência dirigido às mulheres, as mulheres revelaram maiores níveis de hostilidade dirigida aos homens. A hostilidade em relação aos homens aumentou com a idade, enquanto a benevolência diminuiu. O preconceito hostil e benevolente foi maior em pessoas com menos anos de escolaridade. Religiosidade correlacionou significativamente com os índices de sexismo benevolente. Foi assim demonstrada a validade e confiabilidade da adaptação dos Inventários de Sexismo Moderno em Portugal.
    Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica 01/2015; 28(1). DOI:10.1590/1678-7153.201528114 · 0.09 Impact Factor
Show more