Hostile and benevolent sexism - Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women

University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst Center, Massachusetts, United States
Psychology of Women Quarterly (Impact Factor: 2.12). 02/1997; 21(1):119-135. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.x

ABSTRACT Presents a theory of sexism as ambivalence, not just hostility, toward women. Ambivalent Sexism Theory distinguishes between hostile and "benevolent" sexism (each addresses issues of power, gender differentiation, and sexuality). Benevolent sexism encompasses subjectively positive attitudes toward women in traditional roles: protective paternalism, idealization of women, and desire for intimate relations. Hostile sexism encompasses the negative equivalents on each dimension: dominative paternalism, derogatory beliefs, and heterosexual hostility. It is argued that both forms of sexism serve to justify and maintain patriarchy and traditional gender roles. The validity of a measure of these constructs, the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI), is reviewed. Comparisons are offered between the ASI and other frequently used scales of attitudes toward women, with suggestions for the proper domains of different scales. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    Social-Political Contexts for Intergroup Relations and Public Thought, Edited by Kiss Paszkál, 01/2012: chapter Intergroup Relations in Gendered Context: Perceived Threat, Attitudes, and Sexism: pages 57-68.; ELTE.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Numerous studies have documented high rates of sexual harassment and sexual assault among servicewomen during military service. In this study, we qualitatively explore the strategies United States servicewomen employed to reduce their risk of violence exposure during their military service. Based on the analysis of 14 focus group discussions conducted from 2007 to 2010, we found that women used a number of protective strategies, including accessing networks of support, capitalizing on their status (linked to rank, age, or prior deployment experience), and wearing non-feminine clothing to minimize violence exposure keeping themselves and others safe. Although the women describe strategies they perceive as reducing the immediate threat of sexual harassment and sexual assault, they do not directly challenge the social hierarchy of the military environment, rape myths, or sexualized images of military women. Through an in-depth analysis of the women’s experiences and perceptions, we provide insights on the importance of better understanding issues related to environment and safety among women in the military—a relatively understudied area. In light of the context-specific risk women face in the military, we believe that our work provides a foundation for future efforts designed to prevent the occurrence of sexual assault during military service.
    Gender Issues 03/2014; 32(1):1-18. DOI:10.1007/s12147-014-9128-8
  • Source
    A pszichológia mint társadalomtudomány: a 70 éves Hunyady György tiszteletére, Edited by Szabó Éva, Fülöp Márta, 01/2012: chapter Változó sztereotípiák, változó társadalom: az egyenlõtlenségek ideológiái és a kritikai társadalom-lélektan: pages 331-332.; Eötvös Kiadó.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 28, 2014