Side effects of psychotropic medications: Importance of postmarketing surveillance.
ABSTRACT One of the most important needs in clinical medicine is improved post-marketing surveillance of adverse drug reactions. Headlines in the popular press have recently highlighted an increasing number of drugs that have been in use for years that suddenly are withdrawn from the market or are tagged with a so-called "back-box warning" of a potentially life-threatening treatment-emergent event. Yet, there are numerous side effects of psychotropic drugs that are undesirable or that impact quality of life, that go unrecognized by prescribes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
- SourceAvailable from: Audrey Bahrick[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Post-market prevalence studies have found that Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) and Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor (SNRI) sexual side effects occur at dramatically higher rates than initially reported in pre-market trials. Prescribing and practice conventions rest on the untested assumption that individuals who develop sex-ual dysfunction secondary to SSRI and SNRI antidepressant medications return fully to their pre-medication sexual func-tioning baseline shortly after discontinuing treatment. Most individuals probably do return to their previous level of sexual functioning, however recent case reports, consumer-provided Internet-based information, incidental research findings, and empirical evidence of persistent post SSRI sexual benefits in the premature ejaculation literature suggest that for some in-dividuals, SSRI and SNRI-emergent sexual side effects persist indefinitely after discontinuing the medications. The litera-ture poorly captures the full spectrum of SSRI/SNRI sexual side effects, and a lack of systematic follow-up in the sexual side effects research precludes detection of post SSRI/SNRI sexual dysfunction, leaving the formal knowledge base in-adequate and even inaccurate, raising informed consent issues, and leaving clinicians vulnerable to practicing in ways that may be hurtful to patients in spite of their best efforts to inform themselves.The Open Psychology Journal 06/2008; 1(1):42-50. DOI:10.2174/1874350100801010042