Biomechanical Comparison of Different Volar Fracture Fixation Plates for Distal Radius Fractures

Department of Orthopaedics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 E. 9th Avenue, B202, Denver, CO, 80262, USA.
Hand 06/2008; 3(2):96-101. DOI: 10.1007/s11552-007-9074-y
Source: PubMed


The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of four volar fixed-angle fracture fixation plate designs in a novel sawbones model as well as in cadavers. Four volar fixed angle plating systems (Hand Innovations DVR-A, Avanta SCS/V, Wright Medical Lo-Con VLS, and Synthes stainless volar locking) were tested on sawbones models using an osteotomy gap model to simulate a distal radius fracture. Based on a power analysis, six plates from each system were tested to failure in axial compression. To simulate loads with physiologic wrist motion, six plates of each type were then tested to failure following 10,000 cycles applying 100N of compression. To compare plate failure behavior, two plates of each type were implanted in cadaver wrists and similar testing applied. All plate constructs were loaded to failure. All failed with in apex volar angulation. The Hand Innovations DVR-A plate demonstrated significantly more strength in peak load to failure and failure after fatigue cycling (p value < 0.001 for single load and fatigue failure). However, there was no significant difference in stiffness among the four plates in synthetic bone. The cadaveric model demonstrated the same mode of failure as the sawbones. None of the volar plates demonstrated screw breakage or pullout, except the tine plate (Avanta SCS/V) with 1 mm of pullout in 2 of 12 plates. This study demonstrates the utility of sawbones in biomechanical testing and indicates that volar fixation of unstable distal radius fractures with a fixed angle device is a reliable means of stabilization.

Download full-text


Available from: Jennifer Moriatis Wolf, May 28, 2014
30 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We evaluated radiographic and functional results of volar locking plate fixation of unstable distal radius fractures. The study included 27 patients (15 males, 12 females; mean age 45 years; range 18 to 77 years) who were treated with volar locking plate fixation for unstable distal radius fractures. Twenty-two patients (81.5%) had AO type C and five (18.5%) had type B fractures. Two patients (7.4%) had type I open fractures. Dorsal and volar angulation were present in 21 (77.8%) and six (22.2%) fractures, respectively. Four patients (14.8%) also had elbow dislocation and/or fracture and nine patients (33.3%) had disruption of the distal radioulnar joint. Autologous iliac crest graft was used in 10 patients (37%). Postoperative assessments included range of movement and grip strength measurements, and radiographic parameters using the Stewart criteria. Functional results were assessed using the Q-DASH (Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) questionnaire and the Gartland-Werley scale. The mean follow-up was 18 months (range 12 to 34 months). All fractures united without a problem within a mean of 6.5 weeks (range 6 to 8 weeks). The following parameters became equal to the unaffected side: ulnar variance (n=21, 77.8%), radial inclination angle (n=13, 48.2%), radial tilt angle (n=8, 29.6%), and radial height (n=11, 40.7%). The mean radiographic Stewart score was 0.5 (range 0 to 3). The mean grip strength of the operated side was 72.4% (18 kg) of the normal side. The mean Q-DASH and Gartland-Werley scores were 8.3 (range 0 to 70.5) and 4.7 (range 0 to 16), respectively. According to the Gartland-Werley scale, the results were excellent in 12 patients (44.4%), good in 12 patients, and moderate in three patients (11.1%). Three complications (11.1%) occurred, including loss of alignment in two patients, and screw-related discomfort in one patient. Volar locking plate fixation is an effective treatment in the anatomical and functional restoration of unstable distal radius fractures.
    acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica 07/2009; 43(4):303-8. DOI:10.3944/AOTT.2009.303 · 0.61 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although reprocessed drill bits have been in clinical use as a cost-saving measure, their performance has not been critically evaluated in comparison with the performance of unused drill bits. The effect of three commonly used reprocessing methods on the geometry and mechanical performance of 2.5 mm orthopaedic drill bits was investigated and compared with that for unused drill bits. Four mechanically significant drill parameters including chisel edge, chisel edge angle, point angle, and lip length of 36 drill bits in four groups were measured and compared. Group A included unused drill bits. Group B included drill bits reprocessed once by one company whereas group C included those reprocessed twice by the same method. Group D included drill bits reprocessed once by another company. For mechanical performance, a test set-up was developed in which the time of travel of the drill bits through layers of cortical and trabecular synthetic bone materials under constant compressive force were measured. The geometrical parameters were found to be significantly altered as a result of the reprocessing methods. A linear relationship was derived to relate the chisel edge to the drill time through cortical and trabecular bones. The mechanical performance of drill bits is correlated largely to the chisel edge length. A larger chisel edge is correlated to a reduced drill time, particularly in the cortical bone.
    Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine 08/2009; 223(5):625-35. DOI:10.1243/09544119JEIM555 · 1.33 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate and compare the biomechanical properties of 8 different locked fixed-angle volar distal radius plates under conditions designed to reflect forces seen in early fracture healing and postoperative rehabilitation. We evaluated the Acumed Acu-Loc (Acumed, Hillsboro, OR), Hand Innovations DVR (Hand Innovations, Miami, FL), SBi SCS volar distal radial plate (Small Bone Innovations, Morrisville, PA), Synthes volar distal radius plate and EA extra-articular volar distal radius plate (Synthes, Paoli, PA), Stryker Matrix-SmartLock (Stryker Leibinger, Kalamazoo, MI), Wright Medical Technology Locon VLS (Wright Medical Technology, Arlington, TN), and Zimmer periarticular distal radius locking plate (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN). After affixing each plate to a synthetic corticocancellous radius, we created a standardized dorsal wedge osteotomy. Each construct had cyclic loading of 100 N, 200 N, and 300 N for a total of 6000 cycles. Outcomes, including load deformation curves, displacement, and ultimate yield strengths, were collected for each construct. The Wright plate was significantly stiffer at the 100 N load than the Zimmer plate and was stiffer at the 300 N load than 4 other plates. The Zimmer and Hand Innovations plates had the highest yield strengths and significantly higher yield strengths than the Wright, SBi, Stryker, and Synthes EA plates. Given the biomechanical properties of the plates tested, in light of the loads transmitted across the native wrist, all plate constructs met the anticipated demands. It seems clear that fracture configuration, screw placement, cost, and surgeon familiarity with instrumentation should take priority in selecting a plating system for distal radius fracture treatment. This study provides further information to surgeons regarding the relative strengths of different plate options for the treatment of distal radius fractures.
    The Journal of hand surgery 04/2012; 37(7):1381-7. DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.03.021 · 1.67 Impact Factor
Show more