Article

New serological biomarkers of inflammatory bowel disease.

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Ave, 918 Ross Research Bldg, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
World Journal of Gastroenterology (Impact Factor: 2.55). 10/2008; 14(33):5115-24.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Serological biomarkers in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are a rapidly expanding list of non-invasive tests for objective assessments of disease activity, early diagnosis, prognosis evaluation and surveillance. This review summarizes both old and new biomarkers in IBD, but focuses on the development and characterization of new serological biomarkers (identified since 2007). These include five new anti-glycan antibodies, anti-chitobioside IgA (ACCA), anti-laminaribioside IgG (ALCA), anti-manobioside IgG (AMCA), and antibodies against chemically synthesized (Sigma) two major oligomannose epitopes, Man alpha-1,3 Man alpha-1,2 Man (SigmaMan3) and Man alpha-1,3 Man alpha-1,2 Man alpha-1,2 Man (SigmaMan4). These new biomarkers serve as valuable complementary tools to existing biomarkers not only in differentiating Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), normal and other non-IBD gut diseases, but also in predicting disease involvement (ileum vs colon), IBD risk (as subclinical biomarkers), and disease course (risk of complication and surgery). Interestingly, the prevalence of the antiglycan antibodies, including anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA), ALCA and AMCA, was found to be associated with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of IBD susceptible genes such as NOD2/CARD15, NOD1/CARD4, toll-like receptors (TLR) 2 and 4, and beta-defensin-1. Furthermore, a gene dosage effect was observed: anti-glycan positivity became more frequent as the number of NOD2/CARD15 SNPS increased. Other new serum/plasma IBD biomarkers reviewed include ubiquitination factor E4A (UBE4A), CXCL16 (a chemokine), resistin, and apolipoprotein A-IV. This review also discusses the most recent studies in IBD biomarker discovery by the application of new technologies such as proteomics, fourier transform near-infrared spectroscopy, and multiplex enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)'s (with an emphasis on cytokine/chemokine profiling). Finally, the prospects of developing more clinically useful novel diagnostic algorithms by incorporating new technologies in serological biomarker profiling and integrating multiple biomarkers with bioinformatics analysis/modeling are also discussed.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
142 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the last decade there have been intensive efforts to invent, qualify and use novel biomarkers as a means to improve success rates in drug discovery and development. The biomarkers field is maturing and this article considers whether these research efforts have brought about the expected benefits. The characteristics of a clinically useful biomarker are described and the impact this area of research has had is evaluated by reviewing a few, key examples of emerging biomarkers. There is evidence that the impact has been genuine and is increasing in both the drug and the diagnostic discovery and development processes. Beneficial impact on patient health outcomes seems relatively limited thus far, with the greatest impact in oncology (again, both in terms of novel drugs and in terms of more refined diagnoses and therefore more individualized treatment). However, the momentum of research would indicate that patient benefits are likely to increase substantially and to broaden across multiple therapeutic areas. Even though this research was originally driven by a desire to improve the drug discovery and development process, and was therefore funded with this aim in mind, it seems likely that the largest impact may actually come from more refined diagnosis. Refined diagnosis will facilitate both better allocation of healthcare resources and the use of treatment regimens which are optimized for the individual patient. This article also briefly reviews emerging technological approaches and how they relate to the challenges inherent in biomarker discovery and validation, and discusses the role of public/private partnerships in innovative biomarker research. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Journal of Internal Medicine 03/2014; · 6.46 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Crohn's disease (CrD) is a chronic relapsing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) potentially affecting any portion of the gastrointestinal tract from the mouth to the anus. CrD usually manifests between 15-30years of age and presents typically with abdominal pain, fever, bloody or non-bloody diarrhoea, and weight loss. Paediatric patients may show failure to thrive, growth impairment, and delayed puberty additionally. Extraintestinal manifestations like arthritis, uveitis, and erythema nodosum are diagnosed in almost half of the patients. CrD is characterized by a discontinuous and ulcerous transmural inflammation often involving the ileoceacal region and leading to a stricturing or even fistulising phenotype in up to 50% of patients finally. Incidence and prevalence of CrD have been rising worldwide over the past decades. Although many details of the pathophysiology of CrD have been elucidated, no common aetiopathogenic model exist for all forms of CrD, presenting more an umbrella term for a phenotypically and genotypically heterogeneous clinical condition. In CrD, we see an inappropriate response of the innate and/or adaptive immune system to the intestinal microbiota in genetically predisposed individuals. The diagnosis of CrD is based mainly on patient's history and clinical examination and supported by serologic, radiologic, endoscopic, and histologic findings. Antibodies to Saccharomyces cerevisiae and autoantigenic targets such as glycoprotein 2 may aid in differentiating CrD from UC. Their single use, however, is limited by low sensitivity requiring antibody profiling for an appropriate serologic diagnosis. This review focuses on diagnostic and classification criteria of CrD.
    Autoimmunity reviews 01/2014; · 6.37 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are relapsing and remitting chronic disorders. So far, endoscopy is the gold standard for their diagnosis, but less invasive diagnostic biomarkers are needed. Many authors have developed techniques to individuate biomarkers such as genetic testing factor or proteins in biological samples such as serum, plasma, and cellular subpopulations. A protein fingerprint pattern, patient-unique, specific for the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and potentially able to predict the future patterns of disease and to help in diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis is of increasing interest among researchers. Nowadays, a proteomic approach may be used in the identification of major alterations of proteins in IBD, but there is still a lack in the identification of a panel of biomarkers among a significant number of patients in large clinical trials. In this review, we analyze and report the current knowledge in proteomic application and strategies in the study of IBD.
    Annals of Gastroenterology 01/2012; 25(4):303-308.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
2 Downloads
Available from
Sep 12, 2014