Antipsychotic effects on estimated 10-year coronary heart disease risk in the CATIE schizophrenia study

Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, 2024 East Monument Street, Suite 2-500, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States.
Schizophrenia Research (Impact Factor: 4.43). 10/2008; 105(1-3):175-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2008.07.006
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Persons with schizophrenia die earlier than the general population, in large part due to cardiovascular disease. The study objective was to examine effects of different antipsychotic treatments on estimates of 10-year coronary heart disease (CHD) risk calculated by the Framingham Heart Study formula.
Change in 10-year risk for CHD was compared between treatment groups in 1125 patients followed for 18 months or until treatment discontinuation in the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) Schizophrenia Trial.
The covariate-adjusted mean change in 10-year CHD risk differed significantly between treatments. Olanzapine was associated with a 0.5% (SE 0.3) increase and quetiapine, a 0.3% (SE 0.3) increase; whereas risk decreased in patients treated with perphenazine, -0.5% (SE 0.3), risperidone, -0.6% (SE 0.3), and ziprasidone -0.6% (SE 0.4). The difference in 10-year CHD risk between olanzapine and risperidone was statistically significant (p=0.004). Differences in estimated 10-year CHD risk between drugs were most marked in the tertile of subjects with a baseline CHD risk of at least 10%. Among individual CHD risk factors used in the Framingham formula, only total and HDL cholesterol levels differed between treatments.
These results indicate that the impact on 10-year CHD risk differs significantly between antipsychotic agents, with olanzapine producing the largest elevation in CHD risk of the agents studied in CATIE.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patients with schizophrenia are at an increased risk for the development of depression. Overlap in the symptoms and genetic risk factors between the two disorders suggests a common etiological mechanism may underlie the presentation of comorbid depression in schizophrenia. Understanding these shared mechanisms will be important in informing the development of new treatments. Rodent models are powerful tools for understanding gene function as it relates to behavior. Examining rodent models relevant to both schizophrenia and depression reveals a number of common mechanisms. Current models which demonstrate endophenotypes of both schizophrenia and depression are reviewed here, including models of CUB and SUSHI multiple domains 1, PDZ and LIM domain 5, glutamate Delta 1 receptor, diabetic db/db mice, neuropeptide Y, disrupted in schizophrenia 1, and its interacting partners, reelin, maternal immune activation, and social isolation. Neurotransmission, brain connectivity, the immune system, the environment, and metabolism emerge as potential common mechanisms linking these models and potentially explaining comorbid depression in schizophrenia.
    Frontiers in Psychiatry 02/2015; 6:13. DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00013
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of cardiovascular risk (CVR) factors and metabolic syndrome (MS) in patients with schizophrenia. By consecutive sampling, 143 patients (of age ≥ 20 years), out of total 159 patients with schizophrenia admitted to the inpatient unit were evaluated for the coronary heart disease (CHD) risk as per Framingham (10-year all CHD events) function/risk equation and systematic coronary risk evaluation (SCORE) - 10-year cardiovascular mortality risk (CMR). Prevalence of MS was estimated by using the consensus definition. Fifty-two (36.4%) patients fulfilled the criteria for MS. 10-year CHD risk was 1.65%, and 10-year CMR was 1.39%. Compared to females, males had higher Framingham score (1.96 ± 2.74 vs. 1.09 ± 0.41, U value 1987.5*, P < 0.05). Patients of schizophrenia have a high prevalence of MS and CVR factors. Hence, there is a need to screen the patient of schizophrenia for the same and manage the same as early as possible during the course of illness.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Continuous antipsychotic treatment is important in schizophrenia, and studies have shown that rates of discontinuation are high. Some studies suggest that weight gain may lead schizophrenic patients to discontinue treatment, whereas other studies show smaller effects of weight gain on medication discontinuation, and some find weight gain associated with symptom improvement. Our retrospective cohort study investigated the effect of weight change on the continued use for 1 year (persistence) of all antipsychotics, then among users of first-generation antipsychotics and second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), and lastly subgroups of SGAs. We identified 2130 patients with schizophrenia starting an antipsychotic that had not used 1 in the prior year. Using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for demographic and clinical variables, we determined the odds of remaining persistent on medication among patients who either gained weight or did not gain weight in the following year. For all antipsychotics combined, weight change was not associated with persistence. Among SGAs, weight gain was associated with a 23% increase in the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for persistence (OR, 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.51), whereas there was a nonsignificant decrease in the adjusted odds of persistence among first-generation antipsychotic users (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.43-1.28). When SGAs were divided into subgroups (clozapine/olanzapine, risperidone/quetiapine), both had increases in the likelihood of persistence, but only the association for clozapine/olanzapine was significant at a trend level (adjusted OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 0.99-2.16). These findings are supportive of other research that shows weight gain does not invariably lead to medication discontinuation and may be associated with clinical improvement.
    Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology 12/2014; 35(1). DOI:10.1097/JCP.0000000000000262 · 3.76 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 20, 2014