Eighty-five per cent of what? Discrepancies in the weight cut-off for anorexia nervosa substantially affect the prevalence of underweight.

Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Psychological Medicine (Impact Factor: 5.43). 09/2008; 39(5):833-43. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291708004327
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT DSM-IV cites <85% of expected body weight (EBW) as a guideline for the diagnosis of anorexia nervosa (AN) but does not require a specific method for calculating EBW. The purpose of the present study was to determine the degree to which weight cut-off calculations vary across studies, and to evaluate whether differential cut-offs lead to discrepancies in the prevalence of individuals who are eligible for the AN diagnosis.
Two coders independently recorded the EBW calculation methods from 99 studies that either (a) compared individuals with AN to those with subclinical eating disorders or (b) conducted AN treatment trials. Each weight cut-off was applied to a nationally representative (n=12001) and treatment-seeking (n=189) sample to determine the impact of EBW calculation on the proportion who met the AN weight criterion.
Coders identified 10 different EBW methods, each of which produced different weight cut-offs for the diagnosis of AN. Although only 0.23% of the national sample met the lowest cut-off, this number increased 43-fold to 10.10% under the highest cut-off. Similarly, only 48.1% of treatment seekers met the lowest cut-off, whereas 89.4% met the highest.
There is considerable variance across studies in the determination of the AN weight cut-off. Discrepancies substantially affect the proportion of individuals who are eligible for diagnosis, treatment and insurance reimbursement. However, differences may not be fully appreciated because the ubiquitous citation of the 85% criterion creates a sense of false consensus.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: DSM-5 anorexia nervosa (AN) criteria include several changes that increase reliance on clinical judgment. However, research contexts require operational definitions that can be applied reliably and that demonstrate validity. The present study evaluated different operational definitions for DSM-5 AN. DSM-5 AN criteria were applied to diagnostic interview data from 364 women varying two features: threshold for determining low weight for Criterion A (body mass index [BMI] <17.0 kg/m(2) vs. <18.5 kg/m(2) ) and explicit endorsement of weight phobia (Criterion B explicit vs. inferred). Resulting groups of individuals with DSM-5 AN were compared on estimated frequency. In addition, AN groups were compared to non-eating disorder controls and individuals with an other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED) on external validators. All operational DSM-5 definitions produced higher lifetime frequency estimates than reported for DSM-IV AN, with a particularly large increase associated with the broadest definition. All definitions produced significant differences in comparison to controls on external validators that were associated with medium to large effect sizes. Only definitions that required a lower weight threshold or explicit endorsement of weight phobia demonstrated significant differences compared to OSFED on external validators, and these were of small effect size. The specific combination of BMI <18.5 kg/m(2) with inferred weight phobia exhibited few meaningful distinctions from the OSFED group. To balance inclusivity, syndromal reliability, and validity, an operational definition for DSM-5 AN in research contexts should define low weight as BMI <18.5 kg/m(2) and require measurable rather than inferred weight phobia. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2013).
    International Journal of Eating Disorders 09/2013; DOI:10.1002/eat.22184 · 3.03 Impact Factor
  • 05/2013; 2(2):190-203. DOI:10.1080/21662630.2013.840119
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to examine factors associated with completion of an adolescent-only eating disorder day hospital program. A total of 65 adolescents were included. Completers were compared to non-completers on multiple variables including diagnosis, weight, and medication use. Adolescents who completed the program were more likely to have been prescribed antidepressants and less likely to purge. The two groups did not differ significantly on other variables. Few factors differentiated completers from non-completers of the eating disorder day hospital program. Further research is needed to determine the role medications or purging may play in completing treatment.
    Eating disorders 12/2013; DOI:10.1080/10640266.2013.860848


Available from