Article

[Cardiovascular risk and cardiometabolic risk: an epidemiological evaluation].

Centro di Prevenzione Cardiovascolare, ASS4, Udine.
Giornale italiano di cardiologia (2006) 04/2008; 9(4 Suppl 1):6S-17S.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT On the basis of a critical literature review, this article deals with the concepts of global cardiovascular risk and cardiometabolic risk, pointing out their links but also their unresolved issues and discussing their usefulness in clinical practice. The global cardiovascular risk is the probability of suffering from a coronary event or stroke in a given period of time and in this sense it is an absolute risk, generally reported as percentage at 10 years. Usually risk functions are used, derived from longitudinal studies of healthy people at baseline. They consider some factors that are coherently linked with events in population analyses: among these there are some metabolic factors (total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, fasting blood glucose), some biological factors (blood pressure) and some lifestyle factors (tobacco smoking), all modifiable beyond those non-modifiable like age and gender. The chosen factors must be independent at multivariate analysis, simple and standardized to measure, and contribute to significantly increase the risk-function predictivity. To be reliable, these risk functions must be derived from the same population where they will be later administered. For this reason the Italian Progetto CUORE, in the longitudinal study section, built a database of risk factors from longitudinal comparable studies started between the mid '80s and '90s and followed up the participants for cardiovascular mortality and morbidity to estimate the Italian global cardiovascular risk (first coronary or cerebrovascular event) for men and women. Two tools have been produced, the risk charts and a score software (see www.cuore.iss.it). The ongoing epidemics of obesity and diabetes and the fact that diabetes is associated with classical risk factors like hypertension and dyslipidemia induced the American Diabetes Association and the American Heart Association to launch a "call to action" to prevent both cardiovascular disease and diabetes. In this paper, as cardiometabolic risk factors were considered those "closely related to diabetes and cardiovascular disease: fasting/postprandial hyperglycemia, overweight/obesity, elevated systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and dyslipidemia". The association among the cardiometabolic risk factors has been known for a long time, and much of their etiology has been ascribed to insulin resistance. Also, the fact that these "metabolic" abnormalities can cluster in many individuals gave rise to the term "metabolic syndrome", a construct embraced by many organizations but questioned by other authors. From an epidemiological point of view the metabolic syndrome seems to increase modestly the cardiovascular risk, whereas in non-diabetic individuals it predicts diabetes much more efficiently. Many studies have compared the performance of the classical cardiovascular evaluation tools (the Framingham risk score, the SCORE charts, the Progetto CUORE score) and metabolic syndrome in cardiovascular disease prediction. Usually in people at high risk the presence of the metabolic syndrome does not improve the risk, whereas in people at lower risk its presence increases significantly the chances of cardiovascular disease. Many studies have shown that positive lifestyle interventions markedly reduce the rate of progression of type 2 diabetes. Also some drugs were tested for diabetes prevention, usually in people with impaired glucose tolerance. Oral diabetes drugs considered together (acarbose, metformin, flumamine, glipizide, phenformin) were less effective than lifestyle interventions, with different results among the drugs; the antiobesity drug orlistat gave similar results to lifestyle interventions. In Italy an appropriate approach to cardiovascular disease and diabetes prevention may be that of first evaluating the global cardiovascular risk using the charts or the score software of the Progetto CUORE, because high-risk subjects (> or =20%) must be treated aggressively independently of the presence of the metabolic syndrome; as a second step the metabolic syndrome may be sought, because it increases the risk; finally some attention should be paid to non-diabetic hyperglycemic individuals.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
131 Views
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Las enfermedades cardiovasculares (ECV) son las principales causas de morbilidad y mortalidad a nivel mundial y Venezuela no escapa a esta problemática. Evaluar la prevalencia de hipercolesterolemia y otros factores de riesgo de ECV en una población de jóvenes estudiantes de la Universidad del Zulia, Venezuela. Se evaluaron 155 estudiantes en edades comprendidas entre 17 y 22 años. Para la recolección de datos se utilizó una ficha médica. Se determinaron valores de glicemia, colesterol y triglicéridos en ayuna por métodos enzimáticos. 19,35% y 18,71% de los estudiantes exhibieron hipercolesterolemia y sobrepeso, respectivamente, como principales factores de riesgo modificables de ECV. El 37,5% de individuos con sobrepeso presentaron niveles elevados de colesterol (p<0,03). Dentro del grupo de jóvenes considerados hipercolesterolémicos, el 33,33% exhibió hipertrigliceridemia (p<0,001). 84,6% de los participantes no realizan actividad física regular intra ni extracurricular. El 25,16%; 46,46%; 58,71% y 52,90% refirieron tener antecedentes familiares de obesidad, enfermedad cardiovascular, hipertensión arterial y diabetes mellitus, respectivamente. La hipertensión ni el tabaquismo fueron detectados como factores de riesgo en esta población. Los resultados de este estudio demuestran que la población estudiantil exhibe factores de riesgo cardiovascular y orientan a una intervención primaria en estos jóvenes para prevenir el desarrollo de ECV y sus complicaciones.
    Revista Latinoamericana de Hipertension 03/2011; 6(1):8-13. · 0.04 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An association between arterial aneurysms and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) has been described previously. MMPs regulate extracellular structural proteins and tissue remodeling. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is involved in the regulation of MMP activity. The aim of this work was to study the relationship between the levels of MMPs and NGAL and arterial aneurysms. In a multicenter, open-label, parallel groups, prospective study, patients with aneurysmal disease were divided into 2 groups: Group I (with ruptured aneurysm) and group II (with nonruptured aneurysm). Healthy volunteer patients were also enrolled and represented the control group (group III). We enrolled 307 patients (107 in group I and 200 in group II) with arterial aneurysm: 49 popliteal, 31 common femoral, 2 superficial femoral, 29 common iliac artery, 3 common carotid, and 193 abdominal aorta. Finally, 11 healthy volunteer patients (9 males and 2 females; age range, 40-70 years; median 56) were enrolled in group III. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blot analysis revealed greater levels of immunoreactive MMP-9 and NGAL in all patients with ruptured aneurysms, both central and peripheral aneurysms, and in the aneurismal vessels. These results provide potentially important insights to the understanding of the natural history of arterial aneurysms. MMPs and NGAL play a role in development of arterial aneurysms and may represent molecular markers for the prevention of aneurysmal rupture. Copyright © 2014 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Surgery 11/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.008 · 3.11 Impact Factor