Multiple kinesin motors coordinate cytoplasmic RNA transport on a subpopulation of microtubules in Xenopus oocytes.

Department of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology & Biochemistry, Brown University, Box G-L268, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Developmental Cell (Impact Factor: 10.37). 10/2008; 15(3):426-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.06.014
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT RNA localization is a widely conserved mechanism for generating cellular asymmetry. In Xenopus oocytes, microtubule-dependent transport of RNAs to the vegetal cortex underlies germ layer patterning. Although kinesin motors have been implicated in this process, the apparent polarity of the microtubule cytoskeleton has pointed instead to roles for minus-end-directed motors. To resolve this issue, we have analyzed participation of kinesin motors in vegetal RNA transport and identified a direct role for Xenopus kinesin-1. Moreover, in vivo interference and biochemical experiments reveal a key function for multiple motors, specifically kinesin-1 and kinesin-2, and suggest that these motors may interact during transport. Critically, we have discovered a subpopulation of microtubules with plus ends at the vegetal cortex, supporting roles for these kinesin motors in vegetal RNA transport. These results provide a new mechanistic basis for understanding directed RNA transport within the cytoplasm.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There has been unexpected insight into the part that an mRNA plays in the function of the protein it encodes gleaned from visualizing where an mRNA resides in the cytoplasm. mRNAs can localize to distal domains of the cytoplasm in cells with vast cytoplasmic domains such as the central and peripheral nervous system or oocytes and embryos, but can localize within other somatic cell types as well. Localized translation of such mRNAs in the nervous system can supply distant cellular structures, such as synapses, with required proteins for proper function or development. Similarly, the spatially and temporally localized translation of mRNA early in development spatially segregates developmental cues within the egg to facilitate regional cell fate specification and body plan establishment. All mRNAs don't arrive at these sites of localization, an indication that the mechanisms to get these mRNAs to their destination are specially programmed into the mRNA sequence. Molecular recognition of mRNAs to be localized and the putative connection between the RNA and the cytoskeleton for trafficking to their destination are critical steps in the process. In this review I will present the recent years' progress in understanding these two steps in the mRNA localization process at the molecular level, which is among the most critical determinants for localized translation, since only mRNAs that reach the destination can be locally translated.
    Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology 04/2014; · 6.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Kinesin-2 was first purified as a heterotrimeric, anterograde, microtubulebased motor consisting of two distinct kinesin-related subunits and a novel associated protein (KAP) that is currently best known for its role in intraflagellar transport and ciliogenesis. Subsequent work, however, has revealed diversity in the oligomeric state of different kinesin-2 motors owing to the combinatorial heterodimerization of its subunits and the coexistence of both heterotrimeric and homodimeric kinesin-2 motors in some cells. Although the functional significance of the homo- versus heteromeric organization of kinesin-2 motor subunits and the role of KAP remain uncertain, functional studies suggest that cooperation between different types of kinesin-2 motors or between kinesin-2 and a member of a different motor family can generate diverse patterns of anterograde intracellular transport. Moreover, despite being restricted to ciliated eukaryotes, kinesin-2 motors are now known to drive diverse transport events outside cilia. Here, I review the organization, assembly, phylogeny, biological functions, and motility mechanism of this diverse family of intracellular transport motors. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology Volume 29 is October 06, 2013. Please see for revised estimates.
    Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 06/2013; · 20.24 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The neck-linker is a structurally conserved region among most members of the kinesin superfamily of molecular motor proteins that is critical for kinesin's processive transport of intracellular cargo along the microtubule surface. Variation in the neck-linker length has been shown to directly modulate processivity in different kinesin families; for example, kinesin-1, with a shorter neck-linker, is more processive than kinesin-2. Although small differences in processivity are likely obscured in vivo by the coupling of most cargo to multiple motors, longer and more flexible neck-linkers may allow different kinesins to navigate more efficiently around the many obstacles, including microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs), that are found on the microtubule surface within cells. We hypothesize that, due to its longer neck-linker, kinesin-2 can more easily navigate obstacles (e.g., MAPs) on the microtubule surface than kinesin-1. We used total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy to observe single-molecule motility from different kinesin-1 and kinesin-2 neck-linker chimeras stepping along microtubules in the absence or presence of two Tau isoforms, 3RS-Tau and 4RL-Tau, both of which are MAPs that are known to differentially affect kinesin-1 motility. Our results demonstrate that unlike kinesin-1, kinesin-2 is insensitive to the presence of either Tau isoform, and appears to have the ability to switch protofilaments while stepping along the microtubule when challenged by an obstacle, such as Tau. Thus, although kinesin-1 may be more processive, the longer neck-linker length of kinesin-2 allows it to be better optimized to navigate the complex microtubule landscape. These results provide new insight, to our knowledge, into how kinesin-1 and kinesin-2 may work together for the efficient delivery of cargo in cells.
    Biophysical Journal 04/2014; 106(8):1691-700. · 3.83 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 15, 2014