Disparities in the treatment and outcomes of lung cancer among HIV-infected people in Texas.
aThe Department of Radiation Oncology, The Perelman School of Medicine, the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA bDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD cTexas Department of State Health Services, Austin, TX. AIDS (London, England)
(Impact Factor: 5.55).
10/2012; 27(3). DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32835ad56e
HIV-infected people have elevated risk for lung cancer and higher mortality following cancer diagnosis than HIV-uninfected individuals. It is unclear whether HIV-infected individuals with lung cancer receive similar cancer treatment as HIV-uninfected individuals.
We studied adults more than 18 years of age with lung cancer reported to the Texas Cancer Registry (N = 156 930) from 1995 to 2009. HIV status was determined by linkage with the Texas enhanced HIV/AIDS Reporting System. For nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases, we identified predictors of cancer treatment using logistic regression. We used Cox regression to evaluate effects of HIV and cancer treatment on mortality.
Compared with HIV-uninfected lung cancer patients (N = 156 593), HIV-infected lung cancer patients (N = 337) were more frequently young, non-Hispanic black, men, and with distant stage disease. HIV-infected NSCLC patients less frequently received cancer treatment than HIV-uninfected patients [60.3 vs. 77.5%; odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30-0.52, after adjustment for diagnosis year, age, sex, race, stage, and histologic subtype]. HIV infection was associated with higher lung cancer-specific mortality (hazard ratio 1.34, 95% CI 1.15-1.56, adjusted for demographics and tumor characteristics). Inclusion of cancer treatment in adjusted models slightly attenuated the effect of HIV on lung cancer-specific mortality (hazard ratio 1.25; 95% CI 1.06-1.47). Also, there was a suggestion that HIV was more strongly associated with mortality among untreated than among treated patients (adjusted hazard ratio 1.32 vs. 1.16, P-interaction = 0.34).
HIV-infected NSCLC patients were less frequently treated for lung cancer than HIV-uninfected patients, which may have affected survival.
Available from: Alan J Moskowitz
- "lung cancer, although survival appears to still be worse than in patients without HIV infection (Hakimian et al, 2007; Suneja et al, 2013). "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
We conducted a population-based study to evaluate whether non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prognosis was worse in HIV-infected compared with HIV-uninfected patients.
Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry linked to Medicare claims, we identified 267 HIV-infected patients and 1428 similar controls with no evidence of HIV diagnosed with NSCLC between 1996 and 2007. We used conditional probability function (CPF) analyses to compare survival by HIV status accounting for an increased risk of non-lung cancer death (competing risks) in HIV-infected patients. We used multivariable CPF regression to evaluate lung cancer prognosis by HIV status adjusted for confounders.
Stage at presentation and use of stage-appropriate lung cancer treatment did not differ by HIV status. Median survival was 6 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 5–8 months) among HIV-infected NSCLC patients compared with 20 months (95% CI: 17–23 months) in patients without evidence of HIV. Multivariable CPF regression showed that HIV was associated with a greater risk of lung cancer-specific death after controlling for confounders and competing risks.
NSCLC patients with HIV have a poorer prognosis than patients without evidence of HIV. NSCLC may exhibit more aggressive behaviour in the setting of HIV.
British Journal of Cancer 09/2013; 109(7). DOI:10.1038/bjc.2013.545 · 4.84 Impact Factor
Available from: James M Mccabe
- "Previous research has demonstrated that HIV-infected individuals presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) have fewer symptoms than uninfected individuals . Furthermore, HIV-infected subjects may be susceptible to disparities in access to appropriate cardiopulmonary care . With this in mind, we hypothesized that HIV-infected patients would be less likely to utilize EMS and achieve a DTBt less than 90 min when presenting with STEMI. "
International journal of cardiology 07/2013; 168(5). DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.07.016 · 4.04 Impact Factor
Available from: sciencedirect.com
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: HIV-infected patients with lung cancer have been reported to have poorer survival than uninfected patients. Whether this outcome holds true in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is unclear. We examined the effect of HIV infection on clinical outcome in patients with lung cancer who are also receiving HAART. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from Jan 1, 2000, to Dec 31, 2005, with or without HIV infection were identified by querying the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry and the Medicare lung cancer database. Survival analysis by stage and treatment delivered comparing the HIV-infected patients with uninfected controls was done with Kaplan-Meier and Cox models with propensity score adjustments. FINDINGS: 71 976 patients with NSCLC were identified as uninfected controls and 322 patients with NSCLC were identified in the HIV group; median age was 75 years for both groups. Median overall survival for all stages was 7·0 months (95% CI 7·0-7·0) for uninfected controls versus 8·0 months (6·0-10·0) for the HIV group (p=0·16); for those with stage I/II disease it was 37·0 months (36·0-39·0) versus 43·0 months (26·0-58·0; p=0·37); for those with stage IIIA/IIIB disease it was 7·0 months (7·0-7·0) versus 3·0 months (2·0-8·0; p=0·051); and for those with stage IV disease it was 3·0 months for both groups (95% CI 3·0-3·0 for controls; 2·0-5·0 for HIV group; p=0·77). After propensity score adjustment, the survival difference in stage IIIA/IIIB was no longer seen (hazard ratio 0·88; 95% CI 0·71-1·09). The median survival for HIV infected patients with stage I or II NSCLC who underwent surgical resection was 58·0 months (95% CI 57·0-60·0) for uninfected controls versus 50·0 months (42·0 to unestimable) for the HIV group (p=0·88). INTERPRETATION: We noted no significant difference in clinical outcome between patients with HIV and uninfected controls with NSCLC. Survival after curative surgical resection in early-stage patients was similar in HIV-infected individuals and uninfected controls. These data suggest that HIV status should not affect therapeutic decision making in NSCLC. FUNDING: US National Cancer Institute (award number UC2CA148310).
The Lancet Oncology 11/2012; 13(12). DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70466-7 · 24.69 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.