Article

Efficacy of manual therapy treatments for people with cervicogenic dizziness and pain: protocol of a randomised controlled trial

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (Impact Factor: 1.9). 10/2012; 13(1):201. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-201
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Background
Cervicogenic dizziness is a disabling condition characterised by postural unsteadiness that is aggravated by cervical spine movements and associated with a painful and/or stiff neck. Two manual therapy treatments (Mulligan’s Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGs) and Maitland’s passive joint mobilisations) are used by physiotherapists to treat this condition but there is little evidence from randomised controlled trials to support their use. The aim of this study is to conduct a randomised controlled trial to compare these two forms of manual therapy (Mulligan glides and Maitland mobilisations) to each other and to a placebo in reducing symptoms of cervicogenic dizziness in the longer term and to conduct an economic evaluation of the interventions.

Methods
Participants with symptoms of dizziness described as imbalance, together with a painful and/or stiff neck will be recruited via media releases, advertisements and mail-outs to medical practitioners in the Hunter region of NSW, Australia. Potential participants will be screened by a physiotherapist and a neurologist to rule out other causes of their dizziness. Once diagnosed with cervciogenic dizziness, 90 participants will be randomly allocated to one of three groups: Maitland mobilisations plus range-of-motion exercises, Mulligan SNAGs plus self-SNAG exercises or placebo. Participants will receive two to six treatments over six weeks. The trial will have unblinded treatment but blinded outcome assessments. Assessments will occur at baseline, post-treatment, six weeks, 12 weeks, six months and 12 months post treatment. The primary outcome will be intensity of dizziness. Other outcome measures will be frequency of dizziness, disability, intensity of cervical pain, cervical range of motion, balance, head repositioning, adverse effects and treatment satisfaction. Economic outcomes will also be collected.

Discussion
This paper describes the methods for a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of two manual therapy techniques in the treatment of people with cervicogenic dizziness for which there is limited established evidence-based treatment.

Trial registration
ACTRN12611000073909

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Robin Callister, Jul 06, 2015
3 Followers
 · 
149 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sympathetic symptoms associated with cervical disorders, such as vertigo, headache, dizziness, etc., are common clinical disorders bewildering both clinicians and patients. In our clinical practice we observed that sympathetic symptoms associated with cervical disorders were apparently relieved in some patients after undergoing routine anterior cervical decompression and fusion plus posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) resection. This study was designed to investigate the sympathetic nerve innervations in the cervical PLL and its potential correlation with cervical sympathetic symptoms such as vertigo.
    Medical Hypotheses 03/2014; 82(5). DOI:10.1016/j.mehy.2014.02.029 · 1.15 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This systematic review updated and extended the "UK evidence report" by Bronfort et al. (Chiropr Osteopath 18:3, 2010) with respect to conditions / interventions that received an 'inconclusive' or 'negative' evidence rating or were not covered in the report. A literature search of more than 10 general medical and specialised databases was conducted in August 2011 and updated in March 2013. Systematic reviews, primary comparative studies and qualitative studies of patients with musculoskeletal or non-musculoskeletal conditions treated with manual therapy and reporting clinical outcomes were included. Study quality was assessed using standardised instruments, studies were summarised, and the results were compared against the evidence ratings of Bronfort. These were either confirmed, updated, or new categories not assessed by Bronfort were added. 25,539 records were found; 178 new and additional studies were identified, of which 72 were systematic reviews, 96 were RCTs, and 10 were non-randomised primary studies. Most 'inconclusive' or 'moderate' evidence ratings of the UK evidence report were confirmed. Evidence ratings changed in a positive direction from inconclusive to moderate evidence ratings in only three cases (manipulation / mobilisation [with exercise] for rotator cuff disorder; spinal mobilisation for cervicogenic headache; and mobilisation for miscellaneous headache). In addition, evidence was identified on a large number of non-musculoskeletal conditions not previously considered; most of this evidence was rated as inconclusive. Overall, there was limited high quality evidence for the effectiveness of manual therapy. Most reviewed evidence was of low to moderate quality and inconsistent due to substantial methodological and clinical diversity. Areas requiring further research are highlighted.
    03/2014; 22(1):12. DOI:10.1186/2045-709X-22-12
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background There is short-term evidence for treatment of cervicogenic dizziness with Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAGs), but no evidence for treatment with Maitland mobilizations.Objective To compare the effectiveness of SNAGs and Maitland mobilizations for cervicogenic dizziness.DesignA double-blind, parallel arm, randomized controlled trial.SettingA university in Newcastle, Australia.ParticipantsEighty-six participants with cervicogenic dizziness.InterventionsRandom allocation to Mulligan SNAGs plus self-SNAGs, Maitland mobilizations plus range-of-motion exercises, or placebo.MeasurementsThe primary outcome was intensity of dizziness. Other outcomes: frequency of dizziness, the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), intensity of pain, and global perceived effect (GPE).ResultsBoth manual therapy groups had reduced dizziness intensity and frequency posttreatment and at 12 weeks compared to baseline (p<0.05). There was no change in the placebo group. Both manual therapy groups had less dizziness intensity than placebo posttreatment (SNAGs mean difference 20.7, 95% CI -33.6 to -7.7, p<0.001; mobilizations 15.2, - 27.9 to -2.4, p=0.02) and at 12 weeks (SNAGs 18.4, -31.3 to -5.4, p=0.01; mobilizations 14.4, -27.4 to -1.5, p=0.03). Compared to placebo, both the SNAG and Maitland mobilization groups had less frequency of dizziness at 12 weeks (both p<0.05). There were no differences between the two manual therapy interventions for these dizziness measures. For DHI and pain all three groups improved post-treatment and at 12 weeks. Both treatment groups reported a higher GPE compared to placebo (p<0.05). There were no treatment-related adverse effects lasting greater than 24 hours.LimitationsThe therapist performing the interventions was not blind to group allocation.ConclusionsSNAGs and Maitland mobilizations provide comparable immediate and sustained (12 weeks) reductions in intensity and frequency of chronic cervicogenic dizziness.
    Physical Therapy 04/2014; 94:466-476. DOI:10.2522/ptj.20120483 · 3.25 Impact Factor