Validation of the Italian version of the Discomfort Scale - Dementia of Alzheimer Type

Turin University, Turin, Italy.
Journal of Advanced Nursing (Impact Factor: 1.69). 10/2008; 64(3):298-304. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04810.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This paper is a report of a study to validate the Discomfort Scale - Dementia of Alzheimer Type in Italian.
Dementia is a long and highly debilitating illness with a slow course and a steadily rising prevalence. Improving the quality of life of patients with dementia requires instruments to measure their problems and symptoms, because they are unable to communicate and interact with others. In Italy, there are no validated scales to assess discomfort for this population. The Discomfort Scale - Dementia of Alzheimer Type was developed in the USA and has been further tested there as well as in Germany.
The data were collected by 21 nurses during 2006 in five nursing homes with 71 patients with severe dementia. Face and content validity were evaluated in a focus group. Discriminant validity was assessed with the opposite-group approach and internal consistency and inter-rater reliability were measured.
The discriminant validity of the Italian Discomfort Scale - Dementia of Alzheimer Type showed its ability to detect patients with high and low levels of discomfort. Reliability testing gave positive results: the internal consistency level was satisfactory (0.814) and comparisons of overall discomfort scores across nurses show good reliability.
These findings support the use of Discomfort Scale - Dementia of Alzheimer Type in a clinical setting for people with severe dementia for both research and practice. Its ease of use and comprehensibility, and the limited time required to observe patients renders the Discomfort Scale - Dementia of Alzheimer Type a practical instrument for assessment and choosing care interventions.


Available from: Giovanni Renga, Jun 02, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While there is debate about whether it may be better to forgo than to initiate artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) in nursing home patients with severe dementia, the consequences of forgoing ANH in these patients, in particular their discomfort, have not yet been investigated. In this prospective, longitudinal, observational study of 178 patients in Dutch nursing homes, discomfort was measured at all measurement times according to the observational Discomfort Scale-Dementia of Alzheimer Type. Furthermore, at all measurement times, plausible determinants of discomfort were registered. Data were analyzed with the statistical technique of generalized estimated equations. Decisions to forgo ANH were made most often in severely demented, female patients with an acute illness as the most important diagnosis at that time. The mean level of discomfort was highest at the time of the decision and decreased in the days thereafter. There were substantial differences in level of discomfort between patients. Dyspnea, restlessness, and physicians' observations of pain and dehydration were associated with higher levels of discomfort. Furthermore, patients who were awake had higher levels of observed discomfort than patients who were asleep. Forgoing ANH in patients with severe dementia who scarcely or no longer eat or drink seems, in general, not to be associated with high levels of discomfort. The individual differences emphasize the need for constant attention for possible discomfort.
    Archives of Internal Medicine 08/2005; 165(15):1729-35. DOI:10.1001/archinte.165.15.1729 · 13.25 Impact Factor
  • Assistenza infermieristica e ricerca: AIR 26(1):38-45. · 0.40 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Discomfort Scale--Dementia of Alzheimer Type (DS-DAT) measures discomfort in severely demented patients with scores on nine items with behavioral descriptors. Direct observation of behaviour is the preferred method in severely demented patients, but is not feasible for some types of research. Alternatively, a patient's score may be assessed 'retrospectively', scoring an overall picture of the patient. To assess validity and reliability of such retrospective assessments, five observers--three nursing home physicians and two paramedicals--gave a DS-DAT score for 77 nursing home patients by direct observation, and, two weeks later, retrospectively. The mean score of the five observers was not different. The Intra-class Correlation Coefficient for intra-observer reliability was 0.50 for the five observers, and 0.55 for the three nursing home physicians. Our study demonstrated the possibility of a reasonably valid, but moderately reliable retrospective assessment of the Dutch version of the DS-DAT. Appropriate training of nursing home physicians who know their patients well may be required for this.
    Tijdschrift voor gerontologie en geriatrie 01/2004; 34(6):254-9.