Activity of chemotherapy in mucinous ovarian cancer with a recurrence free interval of more than 6 months: results from the SOCRATES retrospective study

Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Napoli, Italy.
BMC Cancer (Impact Factor: 3.32). 09/2008; 8:252. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-252
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Mucinous ovarian carcinoma have a poorer prognosis compared with other histological subtypes. The aim of this study was to evaluate, retrospectively, the activity of chemotherapy in patients with platinum sensitive recurrent mucinous ovarian cancer.
The SOCRATES study retrospectively assessed the pattern of care of a cohort of patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer observed in the years 2000-2002 in 37 Italian centres. Data were collected between April and September 2005. Patients with recurrent ovarian cancer with > 6 months of platinum free interval were considered eligible.
Twenty patients with mucinous histotype and 388 patients with other histotypes were analyzed. At baseline, mucinous tumours differed from the others for an higher number of patients with lower tumor grading (p = 0.0056) and less advanced FIGO stage (p = 0.025). At time of recurrence, a statistically significant difference was found in performance status (worse in mucinous, p = 0.024). About 20% of patients underwent secondary cytoreduction in both groups, but a lower number of patients were optimally debulked in the mucinous group (p = 0.03). Patients with mucinous cancer received more frequently single agent platinum than platinum based-combination therapy or other non-platinum schedules as second line therapy (p = 0.026), with a response rate lower than in non-mucinous group (36.4% vs 62.6%, respectively, p = 0.04). Median time to progression and overall survival were worse for mucinous ovarian cancer. Finally, mucinous cancer received a lower number of chemotherapy lines (p = 0.0023).
This analysis shows that platinum sensitive mucinous ovarian cancer has a poor response to chemotherapy. Studies dedicated to this histological subgroup are needed.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mucinous carcinomas of the ovary can be primary or metastatic in origin. Improvements in the pathological diagnosis have increased the ability to distinguish between primary and metastatic ovarian cancers and shown that primary mucinous carcinomas are a rare subtype of ovarian cancer. Most tumors are diagnosed at an early stage, and the prognosis after surgery is good. Advanced or recurrent mucinous carcinoma of the ovary responds poorly to current cytotoxic treatments, and the prognosis is poor. Here, we review the guidelines for surgery and the results of treatment of advanced and recurrent disease. Chemotherapy with platinum and paclitaxel is currently used to treat advanced disease, but the effect of these drugs is modest, and new treatments are needed.
    International Journal of Gynecological Cancer 11/2014; 24(9 Suppl 3):S14-9. DOI:10.1097/IGC.0000000000000296 · 1.95 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mucinous tumors of the ovary represent a spectrum of neoplastic disorders, including benign mucinous cystadenoma, pseudomyxoma peritonei, mucinous tumors of low malignant potential (borderline), and invasive mucinous ovarian carcinoma. These tumors are related closely to each other and are distinct from other histologic subtypes of epithelial ovarian neoplasms from a clinical, histologic, and molecular standpoint. A continuum appears to be present from benign to borderline to malignant, which is different from other types of epithelial ovarian cancer. Mutational profiles are also distinct, as KRAS mutations are common, but p53 and BRCA mutations are infrequent. These characteristics lead to specific biologic behavior and guide both clinical management and research efforts in patients with mucinous ovarian tumors.
    Current Oncology Reports 06/2014; 16(6):389. DOI:10.1007/s11912-014-0389-x · 2.87 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ovarian cancers have been recently categorized into types I and II according to a dualistic model of tumorigenesis. Data on the correlation between this classification and clinical outcome are still scarce and controversial. A retrospective analysis of patients with ovarian cancer treated from 1998 to 2013 and operated by the same surgeon was conducted. Patients were classified into two groups: type I (125 patients), including low-grade serous, mucinous, endometrioid, and clear cell tumors; and type II (286 patients), including high-grade serous tumors, unspecified adenocarcinomas, and undifferentiated carcinomas. Type II patients had a significantly higher incidence of advanced disease than type I (88.4 vs. 65.6 %, P = 0.0001) and required more aggressive surgical procedures. Rates of optimal tumor debulking were almost similar between groups (92.6 vs. 91.7 %, type I vs. II, P = NS). After a median follow-up of 41 months, 207 patients (50.4 %) were alive and 204 (49.6 %) were dead; 79 type I patients (63.8 %) and 237 type II patients (82.7 %) experienced relapse (P = 0.02). Progression-free survival was significantly different between groups: 25 months for type I vs. 17 months for type II (P = 0.023). Overall survival was not significantly different between groups, with a median overall survival of 75 months for type I vs. 62 months for type II (P = 0.116). The dualistic histotype-based classification into types I and II of ovarian cancer does not seem to correlate with prognosis. Different molecular characteristics of type I and II tumors may have therapeutic implications and should be deeply investigated.
    Annals of Surgical Oncology 04/2014; 21(9). DOI:10.1245/s10434-014-3714-6 · 3.94 Impact Factor

Full-text (3 Sources)

Available from
May 31, 2014