Article

Risk of skin cancer in the drug treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Stanford University School of Medicine, Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, 1000 Welch Road, Suite 203, Palo Alto, Stanford, CA 94304, USA.
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (Impact Factor: 2.62). 10/2008; 7(5):539-46. DOI: 10.1517/14740338.7.5.539
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT It is well established that rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with an increased risk of lymphoproliferative disorders when compared to the general population. It remains unclear whether this risk is owing to underlying inflammation and immune dysregulation, effects of disease modifying medications or a combination of the two. With increasing use of targeted biologic therapies, including those that may theoretically interfere with innate tumor surveillance, there is increasing concern about the development of other malignancies.
The English language literature was searched to identify observational studies and clinical trials reporting incidence and relative risk of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) among RA patients.
The numbers of melanomas reported were too small to draw conclusions regarding increased or decreased risk with underlying RA or commonly used medications. Relative incidence of NMSCs is difficult to assess given the lack of standardized reporting in the general population. No safety signal concerning skin cancer with RA or its therapies is at present identified.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
60 Views
  • Seminars in Oncology 02/2010; 37(1):11-9. · 4.33 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To describe the risk of cancer in patients exposed to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists. The following 2 clinical cohorts were studied: (1) BIOBADASER 2.0: a registry of patients suffering from rheumatic diseases exposed to TNF antagonists (2531 rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 1488 spondyloarthropathies, and 675 other rheumatic conditions); and (2) EMECAR: a cohort of 789 RA patients not exposed to TNF antagonists. Cancer incidence rates (IR) per 1000 patient-years and incidence rate ratios (IRR) were calculated for BIOBADASER 2.0 and EMECAR patients. The IR over time in BIOBADASER 2.0 patients was analyzed by joinpoint regression. The IRR was estimated to compare cancer rates in exposed versus nonexposed RA patients. Standardized incidence and mortality ratios (SIR, SMR) were also estimated. Risk factors for cancer in patients exposed to TNF antagonists were investigated by generalized linear models. The SMR for cancer in BIODASER 2.0 was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.51-0.86), and the SIR was 0.1 (95% CI 0.03-0.23). The IR in RA patients exposed to TNF antagonists was 5.8 (95% CI: 4.4-7.6), and the adjusted IRR was 0.48 (95% CI: 0.09-2.45). The IR in patients with previous cancer was 26.4 (95% CI: 4.1-171.5). Age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and steroids were associated with a higher risk of developing cancer. The IR decreased after the first 4 months of exposure, without statistical significance. Overall cancer and mortality rates in patients with rheumatic diseases exposed to TNF antagonists are no higher than in the background Spanish population. However special attention should be paid to elderly patients, those with previous cancers, and patients treated with steroids.
    Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism 11/2010; 41(1):71-80. · 4.72 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A few pitfalls associated with the Anfinsen’s thermodynamic hypothesis are discussed. The most profound one is the misinterpretation of the Anfinsen ‘thermodynamic hypothesis’ in terms of the Second Law of Thermodynamics. This misinterpretation has inspired many scientists to search for a global-minimum in the Gibbs energy as a function of the conformation of the protein, sometimes referred to as the Gibbs energy landscape. Such a minimum in the Gibbs energy is different from the minimum required by the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
    Chemical Physics Letters 01/2011; 511(1):126-128. · 2.15 Impact Factor