Article

TCT-392 Silent Cerebral Infarcts Following Cardiac Catheterization: A Randomized Comparison Of Radial And Femoral Approaches

INSERM 744 Institut Pasteur de Lille, Lille, France. Electronic address: .
American heart journal (Impact Factor: 4.56). 10/2012; 164(4):449-454.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.04.005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Single center studies using serial cerebral diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in patients having cardiac catheterization have suggested that cerebral microembolism might be responsible for silent cerebral infarct (SCI) as high as 15% to 22%. We evaluated in a multicenter trial the incidence of SCIs after cardiac catheterization and whether or not the choice of the arterial access site might impact this phenomenon.
Patients were randomized to have cardiac catheterization either by Radial (n = 83) or Femoral (n = 77) arterial approaches by experimented operators. The main outcome measure was the occurrence of new cerebral infarct on serial diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Patient and catheterization characteristics, including duration of catheterization, were similar in both groups. The risk of SCI did not differ significantly between the Femoral and Radial groups (incidence of 11.7% versus 17.5%; OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.62-1.16; P = .31). At multivariable analysis, the independent predictors of SCI were the patient's higher height and lower transvalvular gradient.
The high rate of SCI after cardiac catheterization of patients with aortic stenosis was confirmed, but its occurrence was not affected by the selection of Radial and Femoral access.

0 Followers
 · 
90 Views
 · 
0 Downloads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Stroke associated with left cardiac catheterization is a devastating complication, and its incidence has not changed over the decades. We investigated the incidence, in-hospital outcomes and the modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors for periprocedural ischemic stroke. Our retrospective cohort study included all patients experiencing periprocedural ischemic stroke among the 24,500 patients who underwent left cardiac catheterization between January 2003 and October 2010. The case group was compared with a group of control patients randomly selected among those who underwent the procedure during this period. Ischemic cerebrovascular events attested by brain imaging occurred in 37 patients (0.15% of procedures), transient ischemic attack occurred in 9 cases, and persistent neurological deficit occurred in 28 cases. Patients who developed strokes were more likely to be older and were more often female with a greater prevalence of comorbidities. Emergency and longer procedures were more frequent in patients in the case group who had more coronary complications. A multivariate analysis identified diabetes mellitus (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 4.2; 95% CI 1.8-9.9; P < .001), chronic renal dysfunction (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.1-5.4; P < .001), known cerebrovascular disease (OR 5.1; 95% CI 2.3-11.5; P < .001), emergency procedure (OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.4-9.2; P < .01) and recent congestive heart failure (OR 6.1; 95% CI 2.9-13; P < .001) as independent predictors for stroke. The independent modifiable predictive factors were represented by left ventricular angiography (OR 7.5; 95% CI 2.7-21; P < .001), and low operator volume (OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.3-7.4; P < .01). Limiting the performance of left cardiac catheterization to high volume operators and avoiding unnecessary left ventricular angiography may reduce periprocedural ischemic stroke.
    American heart journal 03/2013; 165(3):421-6. DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2012.12.006 · 4.56 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Neurologic complications (NCs) are a rare but potentially devastating complication that may follow percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In recent years, there has been an increase in use of transradial access, driven by a developing body of evidence that favors its use over femoral access. Concerns have been raised, however, that transradial access may increase the risk of NC compared with transfemoral access. We aimed to investigate the influence of access site selection on the occurrence of NCs through a period of transition during which transradial access became the dominant route for PCI procedures performed in the United Kingdom. We performed a retrospective analysis of the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society database between January 2006 and December 2010. The data were split into 2 cohorts based on access site. An NC was defined as a periprocedural ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, or transient ischemic attack occurring before hospital discharge. Binary logistic multivariate analysis was used to investigate the influence of access site utilization on NCs and adjust for measured confounding factors. Between 2006 and 2010, the use of radial access increased from 17.2% to 50.8% of all PCI procedures. A total of 124,616 radial procedures and 223,476 femoral procedures were studied with a NC rate of 0.11% in each cohort. In univariate (odds ratio 1.01, 95% CI 0.82-1.24, P = .93) and multivariate analysis (odds ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.79-1.23, P = .91), there was no significant association between the use of radial access and the occurrence of NCs. These results suggest that radial access is not associated with an increased risk of clinically detected NCs, even during a period when there was a rapid evolution in the preferred access site for PCI in the United Kingdom. These are reassuring results, particularly for operators embarking on a change to radial access for PCI.
    American heart journal 03/2013; 165(3):317-24. DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2012.10.015 · 4.56 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Transradial (TR) catheterization is gaining popularity due to its association with lower bleeding and access site complications, improved patient comfort, and lower costs compared to transfemoral (TF) catheterization; however, there is concern that TR catheterization may be associated with an increased risk of neurological complications. New randomized data has emerged since the publication of the last meta-analysis evaluating the risk of stroke between TR and TF catheterization in 2009. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized studies published until 2013 reporting risk of stroke in TR vs. TF catheterization. Data from 11,273 patients in 13 studies were collated. The majority of patients were men, and 8987 (79.7%) were enrolled in acute coronary syndrome trials. Very few patients had a history of prior coronary artery bypass grafting, and approximately 2/3 of patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Stroke occurred in 25 of 5659 patients in the TR group, vs. 24 of 5614 patients in the TF group. There was no difference in stroke rates between the TR and TF groups (risk difference 0.00%, 95% confidence interval -0.29%-0.25%, p=0.88). TR catheterization is not associated with a significant increase in stroke compared to TF catheterization.
    International journal of cardiology 08/2013; 168(6). DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.08.026 · 6.18 Impact Factor
Show more