Article

Prognostic factors associated with return to work following multidisciplinary vocational rehabilitation

Attføringssenteret i Rauland, Rauland, Norway.
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (Impact Factor: 1.9). 08/2008; 40(7):548-54. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0202
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The number of people in Western countries on long-term sick-leave and disability pension due to musculoskeletal complaints and psychological health problems is increasing. The main objective of this study was to examine whether fear-avoidance beliefs, illness perceptions, subjective health complaints, and coping are prognostic factors for return to work after multidisciplinary vocational rehabilitation, and to assess the relative importance and inter-relationship of these factors.
A prospective cohort study with a 1-year follow-up period was performed. A total of 135 individuals on long-term sick-leave (87 women, mean age 45 years) participated in a 4-week inpatient multidisciplinary vocational rehabilitation programme. The participants had been out of work for an average of 10.5 months.
Fear-avoidance beliefs about work was the most important risk factor for not returning to work, both at 3 months (odds ratio (OR) 3.8; confidence interval (CI) 1.30-11.32) and 1 year (OR 9.5; CI 2.40-37.53) after the intervention. Forty-eight percent of the variance in fear-avoidance beliefs was explained by subjective health complaints, illness perceptions and education. Coping explained only 1% of the variance.
These findings indicate that interventions for these patients should target fear of returning to work and illness perceptions about subjective health complaints.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
115 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose Common mental disorders (CMDs) are major causes of sickness absence and disability. Pre-vention requires knowledge of how individuals perceive causal mechanisms, and in this study we sought to examine work-related factors as causal attribution of CMDs. Meth-ods A trial sample of n = 1,193, recruited because they struggled with work participation due to CMDs, answered an open-ended questionnaire item about what they believed were the most important causes of their CMDs. The pop-ulation included participants at risk of sickness absence, and participants with reduced work participation due to sickness absence, disability or unemployment. We used thematic content analysis and categorized responses from 487 participants who reported work-related factors as causal attributions of their CMDs. Gender differences in work-related causal attributions were also examined. Results The participants attributed their CMDs to the fol-lowing work-related factors; work stress, leadership, reduced work participation, job dissatisfaction, work con-flict, social work environment, job insecurity and change, workplace bullying, and physical strain. Women tended to attribute CMDs to social factors at work. Conclusion Findings from this study suggest several work-related risk factors for CMDs. Both factors at the workplace, and reduced work participation, were perceived by study par-ticipants as contributing causes of CMDs. Thus, there is a need to promote work participation whilst at the same time targeting aversive workplace factors. Further, our findings indicate that work-related factors may affect women and men differently. This illustrates that the association between work participation and CMDs is complex, and needs to be explored further.
    Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 12/2014; DOI:10.1007/s10926-014-9556-z · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aims The objective of this study was to examine differences in the social support rehabilitation patients received from rehabilitation staff and from support providers outside rehabilitation, and to examine the relationships between social support and the patients' reports of subjective health complaints (SHC).
    08/2010; 17(8):424-435. DOI:10.12968/ijtr.2010.17.8.49291
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction The complexity of the process and outcome of vocational rehabilitation yearns for a multifaceted approach. This article investigates whether importance of participation in major life areas for men and women predicts the outcome of vocational rehabilitation. Methods This longitudinal study provides measure points at the start of the intervention (T1), at the end of the intervention (T2) and at a follow-up 6-12 months after completing the rehabilitation program (T3). Associations were assessed by nominal logistic regression. Results The importance of participation in work was positively associated to return to work (RTW), while the importance of participation in leisure activities and importance of participation in family was negatively associated with RTW after the rehabilitation. Gender and number of children also contributed significantly to the regression model. Conclusion To identify individuals' subjective evaluation of the importance of participation may be of value in explaining return or not RTW and contribute to explain gender differences in outcomes. It may also inform rehabilitation counselors in collaboration with clients and facilitate tailoring interventions to the individual's needs.
    Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 10/2014; DOI:10.1007/s10926-014-9545-2 · 2.80 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
48 Downloads
Available from
May 23, 2014