Epigenetic polymorphism and the stochastic formation of differentially methylated regions in normal and cancerous tissues.

1] Department of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. [2] Department of Biological Regulation, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. [3] Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Nature Genetics (Impact Factor: 29.65). 10/2012; DOI: 10.1038/ng.2442
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT DNA methylation has been comprehensively profiled in normal and cancer cells, but the dynamics that form, maintain and reprogram differentially methylated regions remain enigmatic. Here, we show that methylation patterns within populations of cells from individual somatic tissues are heterogeneous and polymorphic. Using in vitro evolution of immortalized fibroblasts for over 300 generations, we track the dynamics of polymorphic methylation at regions developing significant differential methylation on average. The data indicate that changes in population-averaged methylation occur through a stochastic process that generates a stream of local and uncorrelated methylation aberrations. Despite the stochastic nature of the process, nearly deterministic epigenetic remodeling emerges on average at loci that lose or gain resistance to methylation accumulation. Changes in the susceptibility to methylation accumulation are correlated with changes in histone modification and CTCF occupancy. Characterizing epigenomic polymorphism within cell populations is therefore critical to understanding methylation dynamics in normal and cancer cells.

Download full-text


Available from: Adi Zundelevich, Jun 28, 2015
1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the reductionist perspective, genetic modifications are considered to initiate cancer. Their appearance is a stochastic phenomenon, but there are some biases linked to DNA sequence or exposure to mutagenic agents for instance. Cancer genome sequencing has shown a high inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity, sometimes questioning the genetic origin of cancer. Other stochastic processes are also studied in cancer, especially epigenetic modifications. They have a major role in diversifying phenotypes among cancer cells in the progression steps, but might also provide an alternative to genetic theories of cancer initiation. Nevertheless, the reductionist framework remains dominant here. Finally, stochastic cell-to-cell variations in gene expression constitute a third class of stochastic phenomena that can be considered as causal factors in cancer. Highlighting the role of high gene expression variability due to disruption of cellular interactions and communications allows avoiding reductionism by considering the interplay between genetic and tissue levels at every step of the disease. No organization level is privileged in this alternative theory.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cellular transformation in cancer has long been associated with aberrant DNA methylation, most notably, hypermethylation of promoter sequences. A new study uses a clever approach of selective high-resolution profiling to follow DNA methylation over a time course of cellular transformation and challenges the notion that hypermethylation in cancer arises in an orchestrated fashion.
    Nature Genetics 10/2012; 44(11):1173-4. DOI:10.1038/ng.2451 · 29.65 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: DNA methylation is an epigenetic mark that is essential for the development of mammals; it is frequently altered in diseases ranging from cancer to psychiatric disorders. The presence of DNA methylation attracts specialized methyl-DNA binding factors that can then recruit chromatin modifiers. These methyl-CpG binding proteins (MBPs) have key biological roles and can be classified into three structural families: methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD), zinc finger, and SET and RING finger-associated (SRA) domain. The structures of MBD and SRA proteins bound to methylated DNA have been previously determined and shown to exhibit two very different modes of methylated DNA recognition. The last piece of the puzzle has been recently revealed by the structural resolution of two different zinc finger proteins, Kaiso and ZFP57, in complex with methylated DNA. These structures show that the two methyl-CpG binding zinc finger proteins adopt differential methyl-CpG binding modes. Nonetheless, there are similarities with the MBD proteins suggesting some commonalities in methyl-CpG recognition across the various MBP domains. These fresh insights have consequences for the analysis of the many other zinc finger proteins present in the genome, and for the biology of methyl-CpG binding zinc finger proteins.
    Epigenetics: official journal of the DNA Methylation Society 01/2013; 8(2). DOI:10.4161/epi.23632 · 5.11 Impact Factor