A multicenter randomized clinical trial of one-rod etonogestrel and two-rod levonorgestrel contraceptive implants with nonrandomized copper-IUD controls: Methodology and insertion data

UNDP, UNFPA, WHO, World Bank Special Programme of Research Development and Reaserch Training in Human Reproduction, Geneva, Switzerland
Contraception (Impact Factor: 2.34). 10/2012; 87(1). DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.044
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Background:
Comparative data on etonogestrel and two-rod levonorgestrel contraceptive implants are lacking.

Study design:
A multicenter, open, parallel-group trial with random allocation of implants was performed. For every second implant user, an age-matched woman choosing an intrauterine device (IUD) (TCu380A) was admitted. Methods and data on implant/IUD insertion and 6-week follow-up are reported.

A total of 2008 women were randomized to an implant, and 974 women were enrolled in the IUD group. Results from 997 etonogestrel implant users, 997 levonorgestrel implant users and 971 IUD users were analyzed. In the etonogestrel and levonorgestrel groups, respectively, mean insertion durations were 51 (SD 50.2) s and 88 (SD 60.8) s; complication rates at insertion were 0.8% and 0.2%; and at follow-up, 27.2% and 26.7% of women, respectively, had signs or symptoms at the insertion site. At follow-up within 6 weeks after insertion, all implants were in situ, while 2.1% of IUDs were expelled.

Performance of etonogestrel and levonorgestrel implants at insertion and within the first 6 weeks is similar. Short-term (6 weeks) continuation rates appear higher for implants than TCu380A.

Download full-text


Available from: Nuriye Ortayli, Apr 29, 2014
121 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Implanon is a long-acting reversible contraceptive method, consisting of a single rod that is applied subdermally. Ovulation inhibition was determined by serum progesterone (P) levels and ultrasound scanning (USS) of the ovaries. Ovarian function was further assessed by serum estradiol (E2) levels. The effects of Implanon on serum gonadotropin levels (follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH] and luteinizing hormone [LH]) and on cervical mucus were also investigated, by means of Insler scores and sperm penetration tests. The effect of the endometrium was assessed by endometrial biopsies and USS. The Pearl index was calculated over 13 studies performed according to Good Clinical Practice (GCP), including 1716 women using Implanon. Return of ovulation after implant removal was determined by P levels and USS of the ovaries. The contraceptive efficacy of Implanon was high, with zero pregnancies during 53,530 cycles (4103 woman-years), resulting in a Pearl index of 0.0 (95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.09). This was achieved by inhibition of ovulation, which was reflected by suppressed P levels, as the primary mode of action. Ovulation was inhibited, but otherwise ovarian activity was still present (follicle growth, E2 synthesis). The FSH serum concentrations were only slightly lower than preinsertion levels and LH surges were prevented. The viscosity of the cervical mucus was increased. The endometrium was thin but not atrophic; it showed primarily inactive or weak proliferation. Return of ovulation after removal of Implanon was rapid.
    Contraception 01/1999; 58(6 Suppl):91S-97S. DOI:10.1016/S0010-7824(98)00118-8 · 2.34 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Contraceptive methods, including implants, do not prevent common symptoms and adverse health events that most people experience. It is difficult, therefore, to decide whether or not the occurrence of symptoms or adverse events that are common can be attributed to use of a contraceptive method or to determine if a given method changes the likelihood of their occurrence. Based on the review of the literature, no apparent differences in the frequency of adverse events are evident between the six-implant or two-rod levonorgestrel systems and the single implant etonogestrel and nomegestrol acetate systems. The most frequent adverse events reported in clinical trials that are probably related to implant use are headaches and acne. Weight gain, dizziness, and mood changes are also frequently mentioned adverse events and are possibly steroid-related. Other possibly related adverse events, although much less frequently reported, are loss of libido, fatigue, hair loss, and other skin conditions. Persistent ovarian follicles that spontaneously disappear are a common event during use of progestin-only contraceptives, and providers should be aware of this condition to avoid unnecessary interventions. Overall, the vast experience reported in the clinical studies reviewed here show that all existing implantable contraceptives are equally safe. This can probably be attributed to the low-hormonal dose delivered by progestin-implant systems.
    Contraception 02/2002; 65(1):63-74. DOI:10.1016/S0010-7824(01)00289-X · 2.34 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Progestogen-only contraceptive implants are highly effective. In most studies, 5-year cumulative pregnancy rates are less than 1.5/100 women for Norplant and Norplant II. No study has yet reported any failures with Implanon. Weight over 70 kg and age at insertion under 25 years both increase the failure rate of Norplant and Norplant II; however, data are as yet lacking for Implanon. The effectiveness of other progestogen-only implants for which there are as yet few data are unlikely to be any different. Continuation rates are high compared with other hormonal methods and with the intrauterine device. In most cohorts at least 35% of women, and often many more, are still using Norplant by the end of 5 years. Rates vary according to a number of factors, including population studied, age, and parity. Menstrual disturbance is by far the most common reason for discontinuation, with headache, acne, weight gain, and desire for pregnancy accounting for other common reasons for implant removal. Fertility returns rapidly following implant removal, and pregnancy rates (76-100% 1 year after removal) are usually no different from those following discontinuation of any other contraceptive method. There is no increase in the risk of ectopic pregnancy, fetal malformation, or impaired infant health in pregnancies conceived either during implant use or after removal.
    Contraception 02/2002; 65(1):29-37. DOI:10.1016/S0010-7824(01)00284-0 · 2.34 Impact Factor
Show more