Article

A critical examination of dietary protein requirements, benefits, and excesses in athletes.

Dept of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism (Impact Factor: 1.98). 08/2007; 17 Suppl:S58-76.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT There is likely no other dietary component that inspires as much debate, insofar as athletes are concerned, as protein. How much dietary protein is required, optimal, or excessive? Dietary guidelines from a variety of sources have settled on an adequate dietary protein intake for those over the age of 19 of ~0.8-0.9 g protein.kg body weight(-1).d(-1). According to U.S. and Canadian dietary reference intakes (33), the recommended allowance for protein of 0.8 g protein.kg(-1).d(-1) is "the average daily intake level that is sufficient to meet the nutrient requirement of nearly all [~98%] . . . healthy individuals" (p. 22). The panel also stated, "in view of the lack of compelling evidence to the contrary, no additional dietary protein is suggested for healthy adults undertaking resistance or endurance exercise" (33, p. 661). Currently, no group or groups of scientists involved in establishing dietary guidelines see a need for any statement that athletes or people engaging in regular physical activity require more protein than their sedentary counterparts. Popular magazines, numerous Web sites, trainers, and many athletes decry protein intakes even close to those recommended. Even joint position stands from policy-setting groups state that "protein recommendations for endurance athletes are 1.2 to 1.4 g/kg body weight per day, whereas those for resistance and strength-trained athletes may be as high as 1.6 to 1.7 g/kg body weight per day" (1, p. 1544). The divide between those setting dietary protein requirements and those who might be making practical recommendations for athletes appears substantial, but ultimately, most athletes indicate that they consume protein at levels beyond even the highest recommendations. Thus, one might conclude that any debate on protein "requirements" for athletes is inconsequential; however, a critical analysis of existing and new data reveals novel ideas and concepts that may represent some common ground between these apparently conflicted groups. The goal of this review was to provide a critical and thorough analysis of current data on protein requirements in an attempt to provide some guidance to athletes, trainers, coaches, and sport dietitians on athletes' protein intake. In addition, an effort was made to clearly distinguish between "required" dietary protein, "optimal" intakes, and intakes that are likely "excessive," perhaps not from the standpoint of health, but certainly from the standpoint of potentially compromised performance.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Daniel R Moore, May 20, 2014
17 Followers
 · 
1,257 Views
  • Source
    • "They provide " snapshots " of protein turnover (Pikosky et al., 2008) and their results are not always indicative of long term changes in FFM (Aragon & Schoenfeld, 2013; Pasiakos et al., 2013). This may be because amino acids have other impacts related to metabolic pathways and immune function (Phillips et al., 2007) and before oxidation exert a regulatory influence on maintenance and growth (Millward & Rivers, 1988, 1989). Tracer studies can be used to make mechanistic inferences but they do not measure FFM or performance over time. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Caloric restriction occurs when athletes attempt to reduce body fat or make weight. There is evidence that protein needs increase when athletes restrict calories or have low body fat. The aims of this review were to evaluate the effects of dietary protein on body composition in energy-restricted resistance-trained athletes and to provide protein recommendations for these athletes. Database searches were performed from earliest record to July 2013 using the terms protein, and intake, or diet, and weight, or train, or restrict, or energy, or strength, and athlete. Studies (N = 6) needed to use adult (≥ 18 yrs), energy-restricted, resistance-trained (> 6 months) humans of lower body fat (males ≤ 23% and females ≤ 35%) performing resistance training. Protein intake, fat free mass (FFM) and body fat had to be reported. Body fat percentage decreased (0.5% to 6.6%) in all study groups (N = 13) and FFM decreased (0.3 to 2.7kg) in nine of 13. Four groups gained or did not lose FFM. They had the highest body fat, smallest magnitudes of energy restriction or underwent novel resistance training stimuli. Two groups lost non-significant amounts of FFM. The same conditions that existed in the groups that did not lose FFM existed in the first group. These conditions were not present in the second group, but this group consumed the highest protein intake in this review (2.5-2.6g/kg). Protein needs for energy-restricted resistance-trained athletes are likely 2.3-3.1g/kg of FFM scaled upwards with severity of caloric restriction and leanness.
    International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism 10/2013; 24(2). DOI:10.1123/ijsnem.2013-0054 · 1.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Protein is the favorite nutrient of athletes because of its ability to stimulate muscle protein synthesis. While the exact amount of protein for muscle growth is not certain it is possible that amounts greater than the recommended dietary allowance of 0.8 g/kg are needed, although the jury is still out. Current guidelines suggest 1.2 to 1.7 g/kg as the amount of protein needed to improve aerobic capacity through mitochondria synthesis and build muscle mass and strength. The timing of protein intake appears to be the most important factor in achieving positive training adaptations. The period immediately after exercise is currently considered the ideal time. High-quality protein sources that contain all of the essential amino acids appear to be the most anabolic. Athletes who consume high-protein diets should also ingest adequate fluids to help prevent dehydration and consume adequate fruits and vegetables to offset any urinary calcium losses that may occur when protein intakes are high. Nutr Today. 2009;44(5):204–210 P rotein has long been the favored macronutrient for athletes. The logic is simple: if you want big muscles and muscle is made of protein, then eating more protein equals more muscle. This simple rationale is more fiction than fact, but it is difficult to convince athletes that protein is not the most important nutrient for sports performance. Flip through the pages of any health and fitness magazine, and it is easy to see why athletes worship at the altar of proteinVmen with bulging muscles who look like cartoon heroes and women with perfectly toned bodies without a drop of cellulite smile from the magazine pages and claim that the latest protein powder, shake, or supplement is all it takes to achieve the perfect body. This review addresses protein quantity, quality, and timing of intake, as well as the myths surrounding the dangers of excess protein, and discusses the inherent difficulty in assessing how much protein is needed to build muscle and fuel performance.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Adventure racing requires competitors to perform various disciplines ranging from, but not limited to, mountain biking, running, kayaking, climbing, mountaineering, flat- and white-water boating and orienteering over a rugged, often remote and wilderness terrain. Races can vary from 6 hours to expedition-length events that can last up to 10-consecutive days or more. The purpose of this article is to provide evidence-based nutritional recommendations for adventure racing competitors. Energy expenditures of 365–750 kcal/hour have been reported with total energy expenditures of 18 000–80 000 kcal required to complete adventure races, and large negative energy balances during competitions have been reported. Nutrition, therefore, plays a major role in the successful completion of such ultra-endurance events. Conducting research in these events is challenging and the limited studies investigating dietary surveys and nutritional status of adventure racers indicate that competitors do not meet nutrition recommendations for ultra-endurance exercise. Carbohydrate intakes of 7–12g/kg are needed during periods of prolonged training to meet requirements and replenish glycogen stores. Protein intakes of 1.4–1.7g/kg are recommended to build and repair tissue. Adequate replacement of fluid and electrolytes are crucial, particularly during extreme temperatures; however, sweat rates can vary greatly between competitors. There is considerable evidence to support the use of sports drinks, gels and bars, as they are a convenient and portable source of carbohydrate that can be consumed during exercise, in training and in competition. Similarly, protein and amino acid supplements can be useful to help meet periods of increased protein requirements. Caffeine can be used as an ergogenic aid to help competitors stay awake during prolonged periods, enhance glycogen resynthesis and enhance endurance performance.
    Sports Medicine 11/2012; 42(11). DOI:10.1007/BF03262303 · 5.32 Impact Factor
Show more