Article

Update in Molecular Diagnostics in Melanocytic Neoplasms

*Department of Dermatology †Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Advances in anatomic pathology (Impact Factor: 3.1). 11/2012; 19(6):410-6. DOI: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e318271a5cb
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Future classification systems for melanocytic neoplasms will likely include the integration of molecular aberrations. A number of studies have shown that many gene mutations and chromosomal copy number aberrations may correlate with characteristic clinical and morphologic features for melanocytic neoplasms. This review discusses newly described familial germline mutations such as the BRCA1-associated protein-1 familial melanoma syndrome, recently described somatic mutations, and chromosomal copy number aberrations recently described in melanoma. Further, we discuss how these specific molecular aberrations correlate with specific clinical and morphologic features in melanocytic neoplasm and their implications for prognosis and molecular diagnostics. In addition, we discuss state of the art advancements in molecular diagnostics for melanocytic neoplasms and newly developed fluorescence in situ hybridization assays including the utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization for 9p21 in spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms. Lastly, we discuss a phenomenon known as paradoxical activation of wild-type BRAF seen in patients treated with vemurafenib and some potential clinical presentations of this process.

1 Follower
 · 
167 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We recently reported three cases of metastatic melanoma that does not express S100, HMB45, Melan A and Tyrosinase. A concurrent cutaneous scalp primary melanoma was identified later in one of the cases, which showed strong expression of these markers. The difference in immunophenotype between the primary melanoma and its metastasis in the parotid gland in this case raised the question of the biological significance of the expression of these markers and metastatic potential. To address this question, we utilized microarray comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to compare the cytogenetic features between the primary and metastatic melanoma. We observed chromosomal gains including 6p, entire chromosome 7, and 8q11.1-q24.3 in both primary and metastatic tumors. However, the metastatic lesion showed unique additional copy of chromosomal 7q, and loss of chromosome 9p24.3-q13 and chromosome 4, which included Melan A encoding gene region in 9p24.1. The above findings suggest the unique cytogenetic changes in the parotid lesion are most likely related to the metastatic behavior, as well as responsible for loss of multiple melanocytic marker expression in the metastatic melanoma for this case.
    International journal of clinical and experimental pathology 01/2013; 7(1):468-73. · 1.78 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Melanoma is the most aggressive type of skin cancer and has very high rates of mortality. An early stage melanoma can be surgically removed, with a survival rate of 99%. However, metastasized melanoma is difficult to cure. The 5-year survival rates for patients with metastasized melanoma are still below 20%. Metastasized melanoma is currently treated by chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy and radiotherapy. The outcome of most of the current therapies is far from optimistic. Although melanoma patients with a mutation in the oncogene v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) have an initially higher positive response rate to targeted therapy, the majority develop acquired drug resistance after 6 months of the therapy. To increase treatment efficacy, early diagnosis, more potent pharmacological agents, and more effective delivery systems are urgently needed. Nanotechnology has been extensively studied for melanoma treatment and diagnosis, to decrease drug resistance, increase therapeutic efficacy, and reduce side effects. In this review, we summarize the recent progress on the development of various nanoparticles for melanoma treatment and diagnosis. Several common nanoparticles, including liposome, polymersomes, dendrimers, carbon-based nanoparticles, and human albumin, have been used to deliver chemotherapeutic agents, and small interfering ribonucleic acids (siRNAs) against signaling molecules have also been tested for the treatment of melanoma. Indeed, several nanoparticle-delivered drugs have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and are currently in clinical trials. The application of nanoparticles could produce side effects, which will need to be reduced so that nanoparticle-delivered drugs can be safely applied in the clinical setting.
    International Journal of Nanomedicine 07/2013; 8(1):2677-88. DOI:10.2147/IJN.S45429 · 4.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The clinical use of molecular diagnostics, genomics, and personalized medicine is increasing and improving rapidly over time. However, medical education incorporating the practical application of these techniques is lagging behind. Although instruction in these areas should be expanded upon and improved at all levels of training, residency provides a concentrated period of time in which to hone in on skills that are practically applicable to a trainee's specialty of choice. Although residencies in some fields, such as pathology, have begun to incorporate practical molecular diagnostics training, this area remains a relative gap in dermatology residency programs.Methods Herein, we advocate for the incorporation of training in molecular diagnostics and personalized medicine into dermatology residency programs and propose a basic curriculum template for how to begin approaching these topics.Results/Conclusions By incorporating molecular diagnostics into dermatology residency training, dermatologists have the opportunity to lead the way and actively shape the specialty's transition into the era of personalized medicine.
    International Journal of Dermatology 12/2013; In press. DOI:10.1111/ijd.12621 · 1.23 Impact Factor
Show more