Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography and Calcium Score for Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Outpatients

Department of Radiology, Cardiovascular Institute and Fu Wai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
JACC. Cardiovascular imaging (Impact Factor: 6.99). 10/2012; 5(10):990-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.06.006
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study sought to evaluate the prognostic value of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) for major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
The prognostic value of CACS has been well described. Few studies use the rich information of coronary CTA to predict future clinical outcomes and compare CACS with coronary CTA.
We followed up 5,007 outpatients who were suspected of having coronary artery disease (CAD) and who underwent cardiac CTA. Cardiac CT was assessed for CACS and the extent, the location, the stenosis severity, and the composition of the plaque in coronary CTA. The endpoint was MACE, defined as composite cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization.
Follow-up was completed in 4,425 patients (88.4%), with a median follow-up period of 1,081 days. At the end of the follow-up period, 363 (8.2%) patients had experienced MACE. Cumulative probability of 3-year MACE increased across CT strata for CACS (CACS 0, 2.1%; CACS 1 to 100, 12.9%; CACS 101 to 400, 16.3%; and CACS >400, 33.8%; log-rank p < 0.001); for coronary CTA (no plaque 0.8%, nonobstructive disease 3.7%, 1-vessel disease 27.6%, 2-vessel disease 35.5%, and 3-vessel disease 57.7%; log-rank p < 0.001); and for characteristics of the plaques (5.5% for calcified plaque, 22.7% for noncalcified plaque, and 37.7% for mixed plaque; log-rank p < 0.001). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves showed the incremental value of CACS and coronary CTA for predicting MACE: 0.71 for clinical risk factors, which improved to 0.82 by adding CACS and further improved to 0.93 by adding coronary CTA (both p < 0.001).
The CACS and coronary CTA findings have prognostic value and have incremental value over routine risk factors for MACE, and coronary CTA is superior to CACS. Cardiac CT seems to be a promising noninvasive modality with significant prognostic value.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) was the only method to image coronary arteries for a long time and is still the gold-standard. Technology of noninvasive imaging by coronary computed-tomography angiography (CCTA) has experienced remarkable progress during the last two decades. It is possible to visualize atherosclerotic lesions in the vessel wall in contrast to "lumenography" performed by ICA. Coronary artery disease can be ruled out by CCTA with excellent accuracy. The degree of stenoses is, however, often overestimated which impairs specificity. Atherosclerotic lesions can be characterized as calcified, non-calcified and partially calcified. Calcified plaques are usually quantified using the Agatston-Score. Higher scores are correlated with worse cardiovascular outcome and increased risk of cardiac events. For non-calcified or partially calcified plaques different angiographic findings like positive remodelling, a large necrotic core or spotty calcification more frequently lead to myocardial infarctions. CCTA is an important tool with increasing clinical value for ruling out coronary artery disease or relevant stenoses as well as for advanced risk stratification.
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences 02/2015; 16(2):3740-3756. DOI:10.3390/ijms16023740 · 2.34 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scanning is a reliable, noninvasive technique for estimating overall coronary plaque burden and for identifying risk for future cardiac events. Arthur Agatston and Warren Janowitz published the first technique for scoring CAC scans in 1990. Given the lack of available data correlating CAC with burden of coronary atherosclerosis at that time, their scoring algorithm was remarkable, by somewhat arbitrary. Since then, a few other scoring techniques have been proposed for the measurement of CAC including, the Volume score and Mass score. Yet despite new data, little in this field has changed in the last 15 years. The main focus of our paper is to review the implications of our approach to scoring CAC scans in terms of correlation with the central disease – coronary atherosclerosis. We first discuss the methodology of each available scoring system, describing how each of these scores make important indirect assumptions in the way they account (or do not account) for calcium density, location of calcium, spatial distribution of calcium, and microcalcification/emerging calcium that might limit their predictive power. These assumptions require further study in well-designed, large event-driven studies. In general, all of these scores are adequate and are highly correlated with each other. Despite its age, the Agatston score remains the most extensively studied and widely accepted technique in both the clinical and research settings. After discussing CAC scoring in the era of contrast enhanced coronary CT angiography, we discuss suggested potential modifications to current CAC scanning protocols with respect to tube voltage, tube current, and slice thickness which may further improve the value of CAC scoring. We close with a focused discussion of the most important future directions in the field of CAC scoring.
    Atherosclerosis 01/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.12.040 · 3.97 Impact Factor
  • Source
    AIDS (London, England) 09/2014; 28(14):2153-2155. DOI:10.1097/QAD.0000000000000416 · 6.56 Impact Factor