Cohort monitoring of persons with diabetes mellitus in a primary healthcare clinic for Palestine refugees in Jordan

United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, Amman, Jordan Field Health Programme, United Nations Relief and Works Agency, Amman, Jordan Tokyo University Medical School, Tokyo, Japan International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK Medecins Sans Frontieres, Medical Department, Operational Research Unit, Brussels Operational Center, Luxembourg, Luxembourg World Diabetes Foundation, Gentofte, Denmark.
Tropical Medicine & International Health (Impact Factor: 2.3). 10/2012; 17(12). DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.03097.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Objective  To illustrate the method of cohort reporting of persons with diabetes mellitus (DM) in a primary healthcare clinic in Amman, Jordan, serving Palestine refugees with the aim of improving quality of DM care services. Method  A descriptive study using quarterly and cumulative case findings, as well as cumulative and 12-month analyses of cohort outcomes collected through E-Health in UNRWA Nuzha Primary Health Care Clinic. Results  There were 55 newly registered patients with DM in quarter 1, 2012, and a total of 2851 patients with DM ever registered on E-Health because this was established in 2009. By 31 March 2012, 70% of 2851 patients were alive in care, 18% had failed to present to a healthcare worker in the last 3 months and the remainder had died, transferred out or were lost to follow-up. Cumulative and 12-month cohort outcome analysis indicated deficiencies in several components of clinical care: measurement of blood pressure, annual assessments for foot care and blood tests for glucose, cholesterol and renal function. 10-20% of patients with DM in the different cohorts had serious late complications such as blindness, stroke, cardiovascular disease and amputations. Conclusion  Cohort analysis provides data about incidence and prevalence of DM at the clinic level, clinical management performance and prevalence of serious morbidity. It needs to be more widely applied for the monitoring and management of non-communicable chronic diseases.

Download full-text


Available from: Akihiro Seita, Apr 10, 2014
1 Follower
  • Source
    • "Doctors and nurses use the e-health system (Khader et al. 2012), to record all clinical information. Quarterly cohort analysis is carried out routinely through the use of e-health, with standard patient outcomes recorded every quarter (attended clinic, did not attend clinic, died, transferred out to another health centre and lost to follow-up). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In a primary healthcare clinic in Jordan to determine: (i) treatment outcomes stratified by baseline characteristics of all patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) ever registered as of June 2012 and (ii) in those who failed to attend the clinic in the quarter (April-June 2012), the number who repeatedly did not attend in subsequent quarters up to 1 year later, again stratified by baseline characteristics. A retrospective cohort study with treatment outcome data collected and analysed using e-health and the cohort analysis approach in UNRWA Nuzha Primary Health Care Clinic for Palestine refugees, Amman, Jordan. As of June 2012, there were 2974 patients with DM ever registered, of whom 2246 (76%) attended the clinic, 279 (9%) did not attend, 81 (3%) died, 67 (2%) were transferred out and 301 (10%) were lost to follow-up. A higher proportion of males and patients with undetermined or poor disease control failed to attend the clinic compared with those who attended the clinic. Of the 279 patients who did not attend the clinic in quarter 2, 2012, 144 (52%) were never seen for four consecutive quarters and were therefore defined as lost to follow-up. There were a few differences between patients who were lost to follow-up and those who re-attended at another visit that included some variation in age and fewer disease-related complications amongst those who were lost to follow-up. This study endorses the value of e-health and cohort analysis for monitoring and managing patients with DM. Just over half of patients who fail to attend a scheduled quarterly appointment are declared lost to follow-up 1 year later, and systems need to be set up to identify and contact such patients so that those who are late for their appointments can be brought back to care and those who might have died or silently transferred out can be correctly recorded.
    Tropical Medicine & International Health 01/2014; 19(3). DOI:10.1111/tmi.12256 · 2.30 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Diabetes mellitus (DM) and tuberculosis (TB) have existed for thousands of years and even now the global disease burden from DM and TB is huge. The incidence of TB is declining slowly but it still remains a big problem in many populous large low and middle income countries. On the other, hand the burden of diabetes is increasing very rapidly, particularly in the very same countries where TB is endemic. The intersecting double burden is therefore ominous particularly as several studies and systematic reviews have indicated that DM increases the risk of TB disease and results in poor treatment outcomes. To address the double burden, WHO and the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union) in 2011 launched a collaborative framework for the care and control of diabetes and tuberculosis, to encourage collaborative research and implement bidirectional screening of the two diseases in routine settings. This review article (i) explores some of the new evidence for the association between TB and DM, (ii) discusses issues with regard to clinical presentation and outcomes, (iii) presents the evidence, challenges and strategies for bidirectional screening based on field studies to implement the framework and (iv) finally presents suggestions on how diabetes care delivery may benefit from the lessons of the TB DOTS approach and public health principles for structured care delivery.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice 01/2013; 101(1). DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2012.12.001 · 2.54 Impact Factor
  • Source
    The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 04/2013; 17(4):429-30. DOI:10.5588/ijtld.13.0009 · 2.76 Impact Factor
Show more