Article

Effect of Current and Midlife Obesity Status on Mortality Risk in the Elderly

School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Obesity (Impact Factor: 4.39). 09/2008; 16(11):2504-9. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2008.400
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether current and midlife obesity status provide independent information on mortality risk in elderly persons. Analyses were based on 3,238 participants from the original Framingham Heart Study (FHS) cohort who lived to at least 70 years of age and who had BMI measures from when they were in their 50s. Within this group of 70-year olds, obesity based on current BMI was associated with a 21% increased risk of mortality (P = 0.019) whereas obesity in 70-year olds based on BMI measures obtained at around 50 years of age was associated with a 55% increased risk of mortality (P < 0.0001). Compared to 70-year olds who were nonobese at both 50 and 70 years of age, mortality risk was increased by 47% (P < 0.001) in those who were obese at both 50 and 70 years of age, increased by 56% (P < 0.001) in those who were obese at 50 years of age and nonobese at 70 years of age, and not significantly different (P > 0.9) in those who were nonobese at 50 years of age and obese at 70 years of age. In summary, in this cohort of elderly adults, midlife and current BMI had independent effects on mortality risk. Specifically, although mortality risk was increased in obese older adults who were already obese at midlife, this was not the case for newly obese older adults. Conversely, nonobese older adults who were obese at midlife had an increased mortality risk. These observations imply that it is imperative to consider an elderly adult's BMI in context of their BMI at midlife.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Ian Janssen, Sep 01, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
58 Views
 · 
10 Downloads
  • Source
    • "Furthermore, there is still much to be learned about the health impacts of these conditions, and consideration should be given to using examples from other research disciplines to move the field forward. For instance, some eloquent studies in obesity research have shown that using a life course approach for obesity assessment provides important information on healthy risk in older persons (Harris et al. 1997; Janssen and Bacon 2008). More specifically, obesity status in mid-life is indicative of chronic disease and mortality risk in older adults, independent of their current obesity status. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The term "saropenia" was coined by Irwin Rosenberg in 1989 to refer to age-related loss of skeletal muscle mass. The purpose of this current opinion is to provide an evolutionary overview of sarcopenia research since 1989. This includes the creation of an operational definition of sarcopenia; consideration of the impacts of sarcopenia on physical function, chronic disease, and mortality risk; the distinction between the process of sarcopenia and the process of age-related loss of muscle strength, a phenomenon that has recently been termed dynapenia; a comparison of the independent effects of sarcopenia and dynapenia on physical function, chronic disease, and mortality risk; and consideration of the combined influence of sarcopenia and dynapenia with obesity (i.e., sarcopenic-obesity and dynapenic-obesity) on physical function, chronic disease, and mortality risk.
    Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism 10/2010; 35(5):707-12. DOI:10.1139/H10-067 · 2.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The impact of age on anthropometric measures, body composition, and metabolic risk factors following a lifestyle intervention is usually evaluated after adjustment for age at baseline; however, this strategy does not provide a clear clinical message other than age is a predictor of the responses. The objective of this review was to evaluate the independent effect of age groups on anthropometric measures, body composition, and metabolic risk factors following a lifestyle modification (exercise, diet, or combined intervention) in studies that included at least two different adult age groups. Eighty-five percent of studies reviewed reported significant differences among evaluated age groups on at least one studied outcome. In general, when a difference was observed among age groups, the advantage was to the oldest group studied, especially in the reduction of body weight, blood pressure, and type 2 diabetes risk. This is of crucial importance to health care providers because the impact of lifestyle modification interventions may be different among age groups. It is thus essential in future studies to stratify results by age group in order to provide a clear message on the impact of the intervention in different age groups, instead of merely adjusting results according to age.
    06/2013; 2(2). DOI:10.1007/s13679-012-0044-5
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine the association between body mass index (BMI) and mortality in older people. A longitudinal cohort study of an age-homogenous, representative sample born in 1920/21. Community-based home assessments. West Jerusalem residents born in 1920/21 examined at baseline in 1990 (n=447), with additional recruitment waves in 1998 (n=870) and 2005 (n=1,086). Comprehensive assessment of health variables including BMI (m/kg(2)) at ages 70, 78, and 85. The primary outcome of mortality was collected from age 70 to 88 (1990-2008). Adjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality according to unit increase in BMI. A unit increase in BMI in women resulted in HRs of 0.94, (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.89-0.99) at age 70, 0.95 (95% CI=0.91-0.98) at age 78, and 0.91 (95% CI=0.86-0.98) at age 85. Similarly, in men, HRs were 0.99 (95% CI=0.95-1.05) at age 70, 0.94 (95% CI=0.91-0.98) at age 78, and 0.91 (95% CI=0.86-0.98) at age 85. A time-dependent analysis of 450 subjects followed for 18 years confirmed the above findings; a unit increase in BMI resulted in HRs of 0.93 (95% CI=0.87-0.99) in women and 0.93(95% CI=0.88-0.98) in men. Eliminating the first third of follow-up mortality to account for possibility of reverse causality did not change the results. Higher BMI was associated with lower mortality from age 70 to 88.
    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 11/2009; 57(12):2232-8. DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02567.x · 4.22 Impact Factor
Show more