External validation of EPICON: a grouping system for estimating morbidity rates using electronic medical records.

Department of Medical Informatics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (Impact Factor: 3.57). 09/2008; 15(6):770-5. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2774
Source: DBLP

ABSTRACT To externally validate EPICON, a computerized system for grouping diagnoses from EMRs in general practice into episodes of care. These episodes can be used for estimating morbidity rates.
Comparative observational study.
Morbidity rates from an independent dataset, based on episode-oriented EMRs, were used as the gold standard. The EMRs in this dataset contained diagnoses which were manually grouped by GPs. The authors ungrouped these diagnoses and regrouped them automatically into episodes using EPICON. The authors then used these episodes to estimate morbidity rates that were compared to the gold standard. The differences between the two sets of morbidity rates were calculated and the authors analyzed large as well as structural differences to establish possible causes.
In general, the morbidity rates based on EPICON deviate only slightly from the gold standard. Out of 675 diagnoses, 36 (5%) were considered to be deviating diagnoses. The deviating diagnoses showed differences for two main reasons: "differences in rules between the two methods of episode construction" and "inadequate performance of EPICON."
The EPICON system performs well for the large majority of the morbidity rates. We can therefore conclude that EPICON is useful for grouping episodes to estimate morbidity rates using EMRs from general practices. Morbidity rates of diseases with a broad range of symptoms should, however, be interpreted cautiously.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Joling KJ, Van Hout HP, Schellevis FG, Van der Horst HE, Scheltens P, Knol DL, Van Marwijk HW. Depressie en angst bij partners van dementiepatiënten. Huisarts Wet 2010;53(7):420-4. Achtergrond Zorgen voor iemand met dementie kan gepaard gaan met depressiviteit en angst. Er is echter weinig bekend over de incidentie van de depressie en angst bij partners van patiënten met dementie. Wij hebben een schatting gemaakt op basis van gegevens uit het Landelijk Informatie Netwerk Huisartsenzorg (LINH). Methode In een prospectief naturalistisch cohortonderzoek hebben we 218 personen met een dementerende partner vergeleken met 353 personen van vergelijkbare leeftijd en geslacht met een partner zónder dementie. De gegevens kwamen uit LINH-registraties van 2001 tot 2007. De belangrijkste uitkomstmaten waren de incidentie en de hazard ratio (per duizend persoonsjaren) van depressie en angst. Resultaten Partners van mensen met dementie hadden ruim viermaal zoveel kans dat hun huisarts de diagnose depressie stelde als personen zonder dementerende partner. In een jaar tijd registreerden huisartsen een nieuwe depressie bij 18,8 per duizend personen met een dementerende partner, en bij 4 per duizend personen zonder dementerende partner. Ook schreef de huisarts significant vaker antidepressiva en anxiolytica voor aan mensen met een dementerende partner. Conclusie Mensen met een dementerende partner hebben een verhoogd risico op een diagnose depressie in vergelijking met personen zonder demente partner. Voor angst vonden we geen significant verschil tussen beide groepen. angst-dementie-depressie-onderzoek
    Huisarts en wetenschap 01/2010; 53(8):420-424.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The incidence of hypertrophy and recurrent infections of the tonsils/adenoids appears to be decreasing in the Netherlands. It is uncertain whether this is a 'real' decrease in the incidence of disease or an 'artefact'. To investigate possible causes of the decreasing incidence of adenotonsillar problems among Dutch children. Observational. A nationally representative general practice database. Incidence rates were calculated over 2002-2005 among children aged 0-14 years. Multilevel Poisson regression analyses were used to examine the following possible causes of changing incidence rates: change in recording (more substitution codes), change in the demand for care (fewer visits to the GP), and change in the supply of care (fewer antibiotic prescriptions and referrals). Indications for a 'real' change in the incidence of disease were examined by calculating incidence rates of other clinical manifestations of microbial pathogens that may cause adenotonsillar problems. The incidence rate decreased significantly (P = 0.017) from 3.0 to 1.3 per 1000 children per year. Correcting for demand for and supply of care led to a smaller decline in yearly incidence, from 2.9 to 1.7 per 1000 children per year (P = 0.105). No clearly similar trend was found in other clinical manifestations of viruses and bacteria that may cause adenotonsillar problems. Part of the declining trend can be explained by a change in the demand for and supply of care, but no apparent causal clue emerged for the residual declining trend in the incidence of disease.
    British Journal of General Practice 12/2009; 59(569):e368-75. · 2.03 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous research on time to referral to orthopaedic surgery has predominantly used hip complaints as starting point instead of the moment the diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip is established, therefore little is known about the length of time a patient diagnosed with hip OA stays under the care of a general practitioner (GP). No knowledge on factors of influence on this time period is available either. Aim of this study was thus to determine the time an incident hip OA patient stays in the care of a GP until referral to an orthopaedic department. Influencing factors were also analyzed. A prospective observational study was conducted based on data over a 10-year period from a general practice-based registration network (17 GPs, > 30,000 patients registered yearly). Patients with the diagnosis of hip OA were included. A survival analysis was used to determine time until referral to an orthopaedic department, and to determine factors of influence on this time. Of 391 patients diagnosed with hip OA, 121 (31%) were referred; average survival time until referral was 82.0 months (95% CI 76.6-87.5). Less contact with the GP for hip complaints before the diagnosis of hip OA was established resulted in a decreased time to referral. The results of this study show that patients with hip OA were under the care of a general practitioner, and thus in primary care, for a considerable amount of time once the diagnosis of hip OA was established.
    BMC Family Practice 01/2011; 12:48. · 1.61 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 29, 2014