Conference Paper


Conference: PVP2011

ABSTRACT Dissimilar Metal Welds (DMW) are required in nuclear reactors to join low alloy steel components and stainless piping. The thermal and mechanical mismatch between the dissimilar material characteristics favors the stress concentration in the weld along the austenitic/ferritic interface. Assessing the ductile tearing resistance of DMWs is an issue even for crack initiation. But predicting large crack extensions is even more difficult for several reasons: crack path deviation, J-R curve determination, transferability from specimen to structures. This paper presents an approach to determine the resistance curve of a DMW on the basis of a ductile tearing simulation using a cavity growth model.

Download full-text


Available from: Philippe Gilles, Sep 28, 2015
1 Follower
41 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The French field experience in stainless steel bi-metallic welds (BMW) has shown different degradations like external surface corrosion cracks close to the low alloy steel/stainless steel interface or fabrication defects in different other locations. In many countries, some degradation has been encountered in different type of bi-metallic welds: stainless steel BMW or Ni-based alloy BMW through different degradation mechanisms (corrosions). The critical crack size in different location of a BMW is a key safety issue. To-day, there is no flaw evaluation procedure for this type of components in existing operation codes, like ASME XI [7], RSE-M [6] or R6 rule [5]. Consequently a fracture mechanic procedures is under preparation in the French RSE-M operation Code [6] in order to evaluate the critical crack sizes of defects in different area of a bi-metallic weld. The procedure validation is based on 2 specific experimental projects that have been performed on 6" and 16" bi-metallic welds at room temperature and 300°C. Detailed residual stress measurements and simulation have been done, in order to check their influence on the critical crack size. The major results of these projects are: • no instable crack growth for cracks closed to the fusion line, • crack ductile tearing growth take place in the lower strength material and not in the lower toughness material, • the residual stresses have a negligible effect on the critical crack size, • the crack initiation take a place close to the maximum limit loads, • the ductile crack growth is mainly at the deepest point and negligible on the outer surface (for the cracks considered in these test programs), • no existing engineering methods are really available for this type of cracked components, • the crack distance to the interface is a key parameter in term of toughness, • comparison of notched and pre-crack specimen has been done and confirm a small increase of toughness in the case of electro-eroded crack. After a brief summary of the validation programs, the paper ends with a proposed procedure to analyse the critical crack size in a bi-metallic weld through two methods: an engineering method (1) with large safety factor and an elasto-plastic FEM (Finite Element Method) (2) with lower safety factors. They will be included soon in the RCC-M [8] for design consideration of BMW and the RSE-M [6] codes for service behaviour of BMW. Similar method can be used for different type of BMW (VVER, Ni-based alloy...).
    ASME 2008 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference; 01/2008
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Analyses of the stress and strain fields around smoothly-blunting crack tips in both non-hardening and hardening elastic-plastic materials, under contained plane-strain yielding and subject to mode I opening loads, have been carried out by use of a finite element method suitably formulated to admit large geometry changes. The results include the crack-tip shape and near-tip deformation field, and the crack-tip opening displacement has been related to a parameter of the applied load, the J-integral. The hydrostatic stresses near the crack tip are limited due to the lack of constraint on the blunted tip, limiting achievable stress levels except in a very small region around the crack tip in power-law hardening materials. The J-integral is found to be path-independent except very close to the crack tip in the region affected by the blunted tip. Models for fracture are discussed in the light of these results including one based on the growth of voids. The rate of void-growth near the tip in hardening materials seems to be little different from the rate in non-hardening ones when measured in terms of crack-tip opening displacement, which leads to a prediction of higher toughness in hardening materials. It is suggested that improvement of this model would follow from better understanding of void-void and void-crack coalescence and void nucleation, and some criteria and models for these effects are discussed. The implications of the finite element results for fracture criteria based on critical stress or strain, or both, is discussed with respect to transition of fracture mode and the angle of initial crack-growth. Localization of flow is discussed as a possible fracture model and as a model for void-crack coalescence.
    Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 10/1977; 25(5-25):357-381. DOI:10.1016/0022-5096(77)90003-5 · 3.60 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Within the Fourth Euratom Research Framework Programme 1994&1998: Nuclear Fission Safety, the multinational project BIMET was carried out which consisted of bend tests on pre-cracked bi-metallic welds in the form of butt welded pipes and analytical as well as numerical analyses of their fracture behaviour. The present paper reports the application of analytical engineering assessment procedures. The various engineering methods provided very similar results and in spite of the complex nature of the weld they described the fracture behaviour in a very satisfactory manner. The most important lesson learned was that precise and reliable input data are vital to a realistic assessment.
    International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 03/2004; 81(3):251-277. DOI:10.1016/j.ijpvp.2003.12.016 · 1.28 Impact Factor