Monitoring the implementation of Consultation Planning, Recording, and Summarizing in a breast care center

University of California, San Francisco, United States.
Patient Education and Counseling (Impact Factor: 2.6). 09/2008; 73(3):536-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.037
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We implemented and monitored a clinical service, Consultation Planning, Recording and Summarizing (CPRS), in which trained facilitators elicit patient questions for doctors, and then audio-record, and summarize the doctor-patient consultations.
We trained 8 schedulers to offer CPRS to breast cancer patients making treatment decisions, and trained 14 premedical interns to provide the service. We surveyed a convenience sample of patients regarding their self-efficacy and decisional conflict. We solicited feedback from physicians, schedulers, and CPRS staff on our implementation of CPRS.
278 patients used CPRS over the 22-month study period, an exploitation rate of 32% compared to our capacity. 37 patients responded to surveys, providing pilot data showing improvements in self-efficacy and decisional conflict. Physicians, schedulers, and premedical interns recommended changes in the program's locations; delivery; products; and screening, recruitment and scheduling processes.
Our monitoring of this implementation found elements of success while surfacing recommendations for improvement.
We made changes based on study findings. We moved Consultation Planning to conference rooms or telephone sessions; shortened the documents produced by CPRS staff; diverted slack resources to increase recruitment efforts; and obtained a waiver of consent in order to streamline and improve ongoing evaluation.

Download full-text


Available from: Shelley Volz, Apr 29, 2014
  • Source
    • ". A final example is a multidimensional intervention that combines coaching (consultation + planning) and feedback (recording + summarizing) by modifying a patient's preparation for, and recall of, their clinical visit [48] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective Examine existing reviews of patient engagement methods to propose a model where the focus is on engaging patients in clinical workflows, and to assess the feasibility of advocated patient engagement methods. Methods A literature search of reviews of patient engagement methods was conducted. Included reviews were peer-reviewed, written in English, and focused on methods that targeted patients or patient-provider dyads. Methods were categorized to propose a conceptual model. The feasibility of methods was assessed using an adapted rating system. Results We observed that we could categorize patient engagement methods based on information provision, patient activation, and patient-provider collaboration. Methods could be divided by high and low feasibility, predicated on the extent of extra work required by the patient or clinical system. Methods that have good fit with existing workflows and that require proportional amounts of work by patients are likely to be the most feasible. Conclusions Implementation of patient engagement methods is likely to depend on finding a “sweet-spot” where demands required by patients generate improved knowledge and motivate active participation. Practice implications Attention should be given to those interventions and methods that advocate feasibility with patients, providers, and organizational workflows.
    Patient Education and Counseling 05/2014; 95(2). DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2014.01.016 · 2.60 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: In breast cancer, treatment decisions are challenging as patients, their families and providers need to sort through an ever expanding array of options for surgery, radiation, reconstruction and systemic therapy. Objective: To describe efficacy and effectiveness of interventions designed to improve decision quality in breast cancer care. Methods: We describe the competencies required of providers and patients to engage in shared decision making, and then present interventions and metrics that have been shown to improve the quality of medical treatment decisions. A case study illustrates how decision support tools have been implemented in a cancer center in the United States. Results: Patients and providers face multiple decisions after a breast cancer diagnosis and too often these decisions are made without patients having adequate information or involvement. Decision aids, prompt sheets and consultation recordings have been shown to improve the quality of decisions by increasing knowledge, reducing decision conflict and improving communication. These tools have been successfully integrated in a variety of cancer centers, but require some resources and infrastructure to make it work. Conclusions: Patients, their families and providers need to work together to select cancer treatments. These interactions are complex and can be improved through the implementation of decision support.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Use of differential pulse code modulation to provide quantization of control and measurements in a closed-loop control system is examined. Expressions are derived for the quantization error and estimation error and for a stable state transition matrix these errors are shown to be stable. Simulation results are presented that demonstrate that the quantized control performance compares favorably with the unquantized optimal control solution.
    Decision and Control, 1982 21st IEEE Conference on; 01/1983
Show more