Article

The missed patient with diabetes - How access to health care affects the detection of diabetes

Division of Diabetes Translation, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Xuanping Zhang,
Diabetes care (Impact Factor: 8.57). 10/2008; 31(9):1748-53. DOI: 10.2337/dc08-0572
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study examined the association between access to health care and three classifications of diabetes status: diagnosed, undiagnosed, and no diabetes.
Using data from the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, we identified 110 "missed patients" (fasting plasma glucose >125 mg/dl but without diagnoses of diabetes), 704 patients with diagnosed diabetes, and 4,782 people without diabetes among adults aged 18-64 years. The population percentage undetected among adults with diabetes and the odds ratio of being undetected among adults who reported not having diabetes were compared between groups based on their access to health care.
Among those with diabetes, the percentages having undetected diabetes were 42.2% (95% CI 36.7-47.7) among the uninsured, 25.9% (22.9-28.9) among the insured, 49.3% (43.0-55.6) for those uninsured >1 year, 38.7% (29.2-48.2) for those uninsured <or=1 year, and 24.5% (21.7-27.3) for those continuously insured over the past year. Type of insurance, number of times receiving health care in the past year, and routine patterns of health care utilization were also associated with undetected diabetes. Multivariate adjustment indicated that having undetected diabetes was associated with being uninsured (odds ratio 1.7 [95% CI 1.0-2.9]) and with being uninsured >1 year (2.6 [1.4-5.0]).
Limited access to health care, especially being uninsured and going without insurance for a long period, was significantly associated with being a "missed patient" with diabetes. Efforts to increase detection of diabetes may need to address issues of access to care.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Gloria L A Beckles, Aug 19, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
134 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fundamento: la población canaria sufre la mayor mortalidad por diabetes tipo 2 (DM2) en España. El objetivo de este estudio es conocer el estilo de vida de las personas diabéticas del archipiélago y su adherencia al tratamiento, así como la DM2 desconocida. Métodos: estudio transversal de 6.729 personas de la población general participantes en la cohorte �CDC de Canarias� (edad 18-75 años). Se obtuvieron sus antecedentes médicos, dieta, actividad física, medicamentos consumidos, tabaco, etc. Resultados: la prevalencia de DM2 fue 12% en varones y 10% en mujeres (p=0,005). El 22% de varones y 9% de mujeres desconocían su enfermedad (p<0,001). Sumando DM2 desconocida, DM2 no tratada e incumplimiento terapéutico, el 48% de los hombres y 28% en mujeres no seguían tratamiento correcto. Los varones diabéticos eran más obesos que los no diabéticos (45 versus 25%; p<0,001) pero no presentaban diferencias en tabaquismo (28%; IC95%=23-33) o sedentarismo (62%; IC95%=56-68). Las mujeres diabéticas también eran más obesas (54 versus 27%; p<0,001) y, aunque fumaban menos (11 versus 22%; p<0,001), eran igual de sedentarias (75%; IC95%=70-79). La ingesta calórica era menor en quienes sufrían DM2 (p<0,001), pero el 93% (IC95%=91-95) superaba el consumo recomendado de grasas saturadas y el 69% (IC95%=65-72) padecía síndrome metabólico. Conclusiones: la población diabética en Canarias es sedentaria y obesa, muestra un consumo alto de grasas saturadas y gran prevalencia de síndrome metabólico. El porcentaje que sigue tratamiento regular es muy bajo, sobretodo en varones, que además mantienen el tabaquismo.
    Revista Española de Salud Pública 01/2009; DOI:10.1590/S1135-57272009000400008 · 0.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of health insurance and/or a usual source of care (USC) on receipt of diabetic-specific services and health care barriers for U.S. adults with diabetes. Secondary analyses of data from 6,562 diabetic individuals aged >or=18 years from the nationally representative Medical Expenditure Panel Survey from 2002 to 2005 were performed. Outcome measures included receipt of seven diabetic services plus five barriers to care. More than 84% of diabetic individuals in the U.S. had full-year coverage and a USC; 2.3% had neither one. In multivariate analyses, the uninsured with no USC had one-fifth the odds of receiving A1C screening (odds ratio 0.23 [95% CI 0.14-0.38]) and one-tenth the odds of a blood pressure check (0.08 [0.05-0.15]), compared with insured diabetic individuals with a USC. Similarly, being uninsured without a USC was associated with 5.5 times the likelihood of unmet medical needs (5.51 [3.49-8.70]) and three times more delayed urgent care (3.13 [1.53-6.38]) compared with being insured with a USC. Among the two groups with either insurance or a USC, diabetic individuals with only a USC had rates of diabetes-specific care more similar to those of insured individuals with a USC. In contrast, those with only insurance were closer to the reference group with fewer barriers to care. Insured diabetic individuals with a USC were better off than those with only a USC, only insurance, or neither one. Policy reforms must target both the financing and the delivery systems to achieve increased receipt of diabetes services and decreased barriers to care.
    Diabetes care 02/2009; 32(6):983-9. DOI:10.2337/dc09-0025 · 8.57 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Nursing for Women s Health 03/2009; 13(1):78-82. DOI:10.1111/j.1751-486X.2009.01384.x
Show more