The PHQ-8 as a Measure of Current Depression in the General Population

Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine and Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Journal of Affective Disorders (Impact Factor: 3.38). 09/2008; 114(1-3):163-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.026
Source: PubMed


The eight-item Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8) is established as a valid diagnostic and severity measure for depressive disorders in large clinical studies. Our objectives were to assess the PHQ-8 as a depression measure in a large, epidemiological population-based study, and to determine the comparability of depression as defined by the PHQ-8 diagnostic algorithm vs. a PHQ-8 cutpoint > or = 10.
Random-digit-dialed telephone survey of 198,678 participants in the 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS), a population-based survey in the United States. Current depression as defined by either the DSM-IV based diagnostic algorithm (i.e., major depressive or other depressive disorder) of the PHQ-8 or a PHQ-8 score > or = 10; respondent sociodemographic characteristics; number of days of impairment in the past 30 days in multiple domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
The prevalence of current depression was similar whether defined by the diagnostic algorithm or a PHQ-8 score > or = 10 (9.1% vs. 8.6%). Depressed patients had substantially more days of impairment across multiple domains of HRQoL, and the impairment was nearly identical in depressed groups defined by either method. Of the 17,040 respondents with a PHQ-8 score > or = 10, major depressive disorder was present in 49.7%, other depressive disorder in 23.9%, depressed mood or anhedonia in another 22.8%, and no evidence of depressive disorder or depressive symptoms in only 3.5%.
The PHQ-8 diagnostic algorithm rather than an independent structured psychiatric interview was used as the criterion standard.
The PHQ-8 is a useful depression measure for population-based studies, and either its diagnostic algorithm or a cutpoint > or = 10 can be used for defining current depression.

Download full-text


Available from: Janet B W Williams, Oct 13, 2015
512 Reads
  • Source
    • "Physician characteristics (age, gender, race, and medical specialty) were obtained from medical group administrative records. Patient sociodemographic characteristics (age, gender, race, education) as well as tobacco use (CDC, 2006), alcohol use (Vinson et al. 2004; CDC, 2006), and depressive symptoms (Kroenke et al. 2009) were obtained via a previsit patient survey. These data were joined with EHR data to identify which patients had seen the same physician within a year, and to construct the Charlson Comorbidity 4 HSR: Health Services Research Index (Deyo, Cherkin, and Ciol 1992), the Framingham General Cardiovascular Disease Risk Score (D'Agostino et al. 2008), and body mass index for each patient. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The use of physician office-based tools such as electronic health records (EHRs), health risk appraisal (HRA) instruments, and written patient reminder lists is encouraged to support efficient, high-quality, patient-centered care. We evaluate the association of exam room use of EHRs, HRA instruments, and self-generated written patient reminder lists with patient–physician communication behaviors, recommended preventive health service delivery, and visit length.Research Methods Observational study of 485 office visits with 64 primary care physicians practicing in a health system serving the Detroit metropolitan area. Study data were obtained from patient surveys, direct observation, office visit audio-recordings, and automated health system records. Outcome measures included visit length in minutes, patient use of active communication behaviors, physician use of supportive talk and partnership-building communication behaviors, and percentage of delivered guideline-recommended preventive health services for which patients are eligible and due. Simultaneous linear regression models were used to evaluate associations between tool use and outcomes. Adjusted models controlled for patient characteristics, physician characteristics, characteristics of the relationship between the patient and physician, and characteristics of the environment in which the visit took place.ResultsPrior to adjusting for other factors, visits in which the EHR was used on average were significantly (p < .05) longer (27.6 vs. 23.8 minutes) and contained fewer preventive services for which patients were eligible and due (56.5 percent vs. 62.7 percent) compared to those without EHR use. Patient written reminder lists were also significantly associated with longer visits (30.0 vs. 26.5 minutes), and less use of physician communication behaviors facilitating patient involvement (2.1 vs. 2.6 occurrences), but more use of active patient communication behaviors (4.4 vs. 2.6). Likewise, HRA use was significantly associated with increased preventive services delivery (62.1 percent vs. 57.0 percent). All relationships remained significant (p > .05) in adjusted models with the exception of that between HRA use and preventive service delivery.Dissemination and Implementation ImplicationsOffice-based tools intended to facilitate the implementation of desired primary care practice redesign are associated with both positive and negative cost and quality outcomes. Findings highlight the need for monitoring both intended and unintended consequences of office-based tools commonly used in primary care practice redesign.
    Health Services Research 08/2015; DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.12348 · 2.78 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The numerical ratings scale is supported as a valid and reliable measure of pain intensity (Downie et al., 1978). Depression was measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8), which is a well-validated measure of depression in clinical and general populations (Kroenke et al., 2009; Shih, Schell, Hambarsoomian, Marshall, & Belzberg, 2006). The PHQ-8 asks participants to rate the frequency of depressive symptoms over the previous 2 weeks on a 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) scale; scores range from 0 –24, with higher scores indicative of greater depressive symptomatology. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is growing recognition that individuals who experience traumatic injuries perceive themselves as victims of injustice and that elevated levels of perceived injustice are associated with problematic physical and psychological outcomes. To date, research regarding injustice perception and injury outcomes has been restricted to a small number of musculoskeletal pain conditions. No research to date has examined the potential impact of perceived injustice among individuals admitted for trauma care. As part of this cross-sectional study, individuals (n = 155) admitted to a Level-1 trauma center completed measures of perceived injustice, pain, depression, posttraumatic stress, and health related (physical and mental/emotional) quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes 12 months after trauma admission. Bivariate analyses revealed significant associations between perceived injustice and demographic variables (education, income, race, and age) as well as injury-related variables (type of injury and length of hospital stay). Perceived injustice was correlated with greater pain intensity, depression, and PTSD symptoms, as well as poorer physical and mental HRQoL. Controlling for relevant demographic and injury-related variables, perceived injustice accounted for unique variance in pain intensity, depression severity, the presence and intensity of PTSD symptoms, mental HRQoL, and was marginally significant for physical HRQoL. This is the first study to examine perceived injustice in a trauma sample. Results support the presence of injustice perception in this group and its associations with pain and quality of life outcomes. Additional research is suggested to explore the impact of perceived injustice on recovery outcomes among individuals who have sustained traumatic injury. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
    Rehabilitation Psychology 07/2015; 60(3). DOI:10.1037/rep0000043 · 1.91 Impact Factor
    • "A cutoff score of 26 or less is used to identify women with a sexual dysfunction (Meston, 2003; Wiegel, Meston, & Rosen, 2005). Symptoms of depression in the participants were investigated by using the Patient Health Questionnaire -8 (PHQ-8) (Kroenke et al., 2009; Skopp, Luxton, Bush, & Sirotin, 2011). Depressive symptoms are identified as acquiring a total score of 10 or greater (Smith, Gotman, Lin, & Yonkers, 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of relationship dissatisfaction among Australian women during the first year after childbirth and to uncover factors affecting their relationships. Postnatal women who had given birth during past 12 months were invited to participate in a cross-sectional online study. A comprehensive multi-section questionnaire in addition to Relationship Assessment Scale, Female Sexual Function Index and Patient Health Questionnaire were used to collect data. Responses were analysed using SPSS for windows. Results showed that 37.2% of the participants experienced relationship dissatisfaction. Results of the multiple logistic regression revealed that the following were significant risk factors for relationship dissatisfaction during the first postpartum year: annual income less than $50,000, sexual dysfunction, being clinically diagnosed with depression and having symptoms of depression according to the PHQ scores (p<0.05). Compared to heterosexual relationships, women who were in a same-sex relationship were less likely to have relationship dissatisfaction. In addition, during 6-12 months postpartum women were less likely to have relationship dissatisfaction compared to 0-5 months postpartum (p<0.05).
    Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 07/2015; DOI:10.1080/0092623X.2015.1069433 · 1.27 Impact Factor
Show more