Article

Interobserver variation in the classification of thymic tumours--a multicentre study using the WHO classification system.

Department of Pathology, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Histopathology (Impact Factor: 2.86). 09/2008; 53(2):218-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2008.03088.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To test the reproducibility of the current World Health Organization (WHO) classification of thymic epithelial tumours and to determine the level of interobserver variation within a group of pathologists, all with experience and expertise in thoracic pathology.
Ninety-five thymic tumours were circulated to a group of 17 pathologists in the UK and The Netherlands over a 1-year period. Participants were asked to classify them according to WHO criteria. The diagnoses were subjected to statistical analysis and kappa values calculated. The overall level of agreement was moderate (kappa 0.45). When the categories were reduced in number by creating two groups, (A + AB + B1 + B2 and B3 + C), the level of agreement increased to 0.62. An alternative grouping (A + AB + B1 and B2 + B3 + C) increased it slightly further. The best agreement was in tumour types A and AB. Difficulties arose in distinguishing B1 tumours from B2 tumours and B2 tumours from B3 tumours.
Although the WHO system describes a number of well-defined tumour types with clear diagnostic criteria, the overall level of agreement was moderate and improved if some groups were amalgamated.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
75 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Thymoma and thymic carcinoma are an extremely heterogeneous group of neoplastic lesions with an exceedingly wide spectrum of morphologic appearances. They show different presentations with a variable and unpredictable evolution ranging from an indolent non-invasive attitude to a highly infiltrative and metastasising one. Prognosis can be predicted on the basis of a number of variables, mainly staging, the WHO histological pattern and diameter of the tumour. Complete surgical resection is certainly the gold standard to achieve cure. However, especially in patients with lesions at advanced stage, complete resection may be difficult and recurrence often occurs; at these stages, disease-free long-term survival may be difficult to be accomplished. Chemo- and radiotherapy protocols have been designed to complete surgical treatment and improve results in inoperable patients as well, based on the reported sensitivity of thymic tumours to these treatment modalities. The integration of clinical staging and histology, with the new histogenetic morphological classification, has contributed to design multimodality treatment protocols that help to improve prognosis. Induction therapy can now be applied before surgery in patients with tumours considered inoperable, improving resectability and outcome without adding morbidity and mortality to the surgical procedure. This newly developed approach helps to reduce the recurrence rate and to ameliorate disease-free survival. New therapies are now being evaluated as for many other tumours; however, they still need confirmation in prospective randomised studies. In the future, integrated treatment modality should be incorporated in a standardised approach that goes from a careful assessment of histology, staging and lymph node status, and a constructive and non-empirical co-operation between medical and radiation oncologists, pathologists and thoracic surgeons.
    European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery: official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery 08/2009; 37(1):13-25. · 2.40 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) currently requires an integrated clinical-radiological-pathological approach in which the histology plays a different role from in the past. The first reason for this change is that non-invasive diagnostic procedures, particularly pulmonary function tests and high resolution computed tomography, have become increasingly competitive with biopsy in providing prognostic information. The other reason is a better appreciation of the limitations of histology: sampling error and interobserver variation. In this review we analyze the reasons for this change of perspective, provide an update on the practical role of histology in the diagnosis of IPF and discuss some of its complications.
    Respiratory medicine 07/2010; 104 Suppl 1:S11-22. · 2.33 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: Histopathological diagnosis of thymic epithelial tumors according to the current World Health Organization classification is not adequately reproducible; however, most thoracic clinicians are unaware of this. We illustrate this problem in practical settings to raise clinician awareness. METHODS: An expert pathologist specialized in thymic pathology and a trained general pathologist independently diagnosed 158 resected thymic epithelial tumors. Assuming that the expert's diagnoses were more accurate, the two pathologists' diagnoses were judged to be concordant when tumor subtypes (thymoma) or categories (thymic carcinoma and neuroendocrine tumor) were in agreement. RESULTS: The concordance rates for different thymoma subtypes were 75 % (3/4), 30 % (11/37), 100 % (17/17), 80 % (39/49), and 53 % (9/17) for types A, AB, B1, B2, and B3, respectively. Discordant cases of type AB thymoma were mainly diagnosed as type B1 or B2 by the general pathologist. Discordant cases of type B2 thymoma were diagnosed as type AB, B1, or B3, and discordant cases of type B3 thymoma were diagnosed as type A, B2, or carcinoma. Discordant cases of thymic carcinoma were diagnosed as type A or B3 thymoma. CONCLUSION: Investigation of the concordant and discordant cases suggested that reasonable discrepancies can occur because of the noncommittal categorical boundaries inherent in this classification. Thoracic clinicians should consider this potential problem in daily practice.
    General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 12/2012;