Exploring the Neural Correlates of Social Stereotyping

School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, King College, Scottland, UK.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (Impact Factor: 4.69). 09/2008; 21(8):1560-70. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21091
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Judging people on the basis of cultural stereotypes is a ubiquitous facet of daily life, yet little is known about how this fundamental inferential strategy is implemented in the brain. Using fMRI, we measured neural activity while participants made judgments about the likely actor (i.e., person-focus) and location (i.e., place-focus) of a series of activities, some of which were associated with prevailing gender stereotypes. Results revealed that stereotyping was underpinned by activity in areas associated with evaluative processing (e.g., ventral medial prefrontal cortex, amygdala) and the representation of action knowledge (e.g., supramarginal gyrus, middle temporal gyrus). In addition, activity accompanying stereotypic judgments was correlated with the strength of participants' explicit and implicit gender stereotypes. These findings elucidate how stereotyping fits within the neuroscience of person understanding.

Download full-text


Available from: David John Turk, Jul 29, 2015
  • Source
    • "herman , Lee , Bessenoff , & Frost , 1998 ) —such as when a politician endorses policy positions that deviate from that of his or her party . Although neuroimaging studies have largely focused on the neural substrates associated with categorical , stereotype - based responses ( Gilbert et al . , 2012 ; Mitchell , Ames , Jenkins , & Banaji , 2009 ; Quadflieg et al . , 2009 ; Wheeler & Fiske , 2005 ) , one study has examined neural responses to expectancy violations in a political context ( Cloutier , Gabrieli , O ' Young , & Ambady , 2011 ) . Students at MIT were presented with photographs of 80 unfamiliar Democratic and Republican politicians who were paired with views that were either typical or atypica"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The emergence of political neuroscience—an interdisciplinary venture involving political science, psychology, and cognitive neuroscience—has piqued the interests of scholars as well as the mass public. In this chapter, we review evidence pertaining to four areas of inquiry that have generated most of the research in political neuroscience to date: (1) racial prejudice and intergroup relations; (2) the existence of partisan bias and motivated political cognition; (3) the nature of left‐right differences in political orientation; and (4) the dimensional structure of political attitudes. Although these topics are well‐known to political psychologists, the application of models and methods from neuroscience has renewed interest in each of them and yielded novel insights. There is reason to believe that many other areas of political psychology await similarly promising renewals and that innovative methods will continue to advance our understanding of the physiological processes involved in political cognition, evaluation, judgment, and behavior. We address limitations, criticisms, and potential pitfalls of existing work—including the “chicken‐and‐egg problem”—and propose an ambitious agenda for the next generation of research in political neuroscience.
    Political Psychology 02/2014; 35. DOI:10.1111/pops.12162 · 1.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Amodio, Devine, & Harmon-­‐Jones, 2008; Amodio, et al., 2004; Beer, et al., 2008). More convincing evidence comes from Quadflieg et al. (2009), who found that medial anterior PFC activity was enhanced during expression of stereotypic associations between an activity (e.g. mowing the lawn) and gender, compared with stereotypic associations between an activity and a place (indoor versus outdoor). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: When interacting with someone from another social group, one's responses may be influenced by both stereotypes and evaluations. Given behavioral results suggesting that stereotypes and evaluative associations operate independently, we used fMRI to test whether these biases are mediated by distinct brain systems. White participants viewed pairs of Black or White faces and judged them based on an evaluation (who would you befriend?) or a stereotype-relevant trait (who is more likely to enjoy athletic activities?). Multi-voxel pattern analysis revealed that a predominantly occipital network represented race in a context-invariant manner. However, lateral orbitofrontal cortex preferentially represented race during friendship judgments, whereas anterior medial prefrontal cortex preferentially represented race during trait judgments. Furthermore, representation of race in left temporal pole correlated with a behavioral measure of evaluative bias during friendship judgments and, independently, a measure of stereotyping during trait judgments. Whereas early sensory regions represent race in an apparently invariant manner, representations in higher-level regions are multi-componential and context-dependent.
    Neuropsychologia 09/2012; 50(14). DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.002 · 3.45 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In monkeys, ablation of the medial prefrontal cortex decreases interest in social stimuli, while not affecting valuation of objects (Deaner et al., 2005; Rudebeck, 2006). In humans, vmPFC is implicated in evaluation (Assmus et al., 2007; Quadflieg et al., 2009), preference (Mitchell et al., 2006) and understanding of others (Lewis et al., 2011). Together, these findings suggest that vmPFC may be a unique neural correlate of social (as opposed to core) forms "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Disgust for contaminating objects (core disgust), immoral behaviors (moral disgust) and unsavory others (interpersonal disgust), have been assumed to be closely related. It is not clear, however, whether different forms of disgust are mediated by overlapping or specific neural substrates. We report that 10 patients with damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) avoided behaviors that normally elicit interpersonal disgust (e.g. using the scarf of a busker) less frequently than healthy and brain-damaged controls, whereas they avoided core and moral disgust elicitors at normal rates. These results indicate that different forms of disgust are dissociated neurally. We propose that the vmPFC is causally (and selectively) involved in mediating interpersonal disgust, shaping patterns of social avoidance and approach.
    Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 07/2012; DOI:10.1093/scan/nss087 · 5.88 Impact Factor
Show more