Questionable Hospital Chart Documentation Practices by Physicians

UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08903-0019, USA.
Journal of General Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.42). 09/2008; 23(11):1865-70. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0750-6
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Physicians, influenced by various pressures, may document information in patient records that they did not personally observe.
To evaluate the hospital chart documentation practices of internists and internal medicine sub-specialists in the Northeastern United States.
An anonymous mail survey questionnaire.
One thousand one hundred twenty-six randomly selected internists and internal medicine sub-specialists.
Responses to questions describing their own hospital chart documentation practices, those they observed among their colleagues, and ratings of the importance of possible influences.
Response rate was 43%. Fifty-nine percent (59%) of physicians reported personally engaging in one or more of six questionable documentation scenarios. Forty percent (40%, CI; 37%-43%) indicated that they recorded laboratory notes in patient records based on information that they did not personally obtain, while 6% (CI; 5%-8%) admitted to writing notes on patients not personally seen or examined. The corresponding percentages reported for their colleagues were 52% (CI; 49%-56%) and 22% (CI; 20%-25%), respectively. Increased rates of documentation lapses were significantly associated with working directly with residents and/or fellows (OR = 1.71, CI; 1.30-2.25), younger age (OR for 10 year age decrease = 1.35, CI; 1.19-1.53), white race (OR = 1.47, CI; 1.08-2.00), and graduation from US medical schools (OR = 1.75, CI; 1.31-2.34).
Most physicians report having engaged in questionable hospital chart documentation. This practice is more common among physicians who are younger, working with house staff, and graduates of US medical schools.


Available from: Cristine Delnevo, Mar 14, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: AimsThe U.S. Veterans Health Administration (VA) used performance measures and electronic clinical reminders to implement brief intervention for unhealthy alcohol use. We evaluated whether documented brief intervention was associated with subsequent changes in drinking during early implementation.DesignObservational, retrospective cohort study using secondary clinical and administrative data.Setting30 VA facilities.ParticipantsOutpatients who screened positive for unhealthy alcohol use (AUDIT-C ≥ 5) in the 6 months after the brief intervention performance measure (n=22,214) and had follow-up screening 9-15 months later (n=6,210; 28%).MeasurementsMultilevel logistic regression estimated the adjusted prevalence of resolution of unhealthy alcohol use (follow-up AUDIT-C <5 with ≥ 2 point reduction) for patients with and without documented brief intervention (documented advice to reduce or abstain from drinking).FindingsAmong 6,210 patients with follow-up alcohol screening, 1,751 (28%) had brief intervention and 2,922 (47%) resolved unhealthy alcohol use at follow-up. Patients with documented brief intervention were older and more likely to have other substance use disorders, mental health conditions, poor health, and more severe unhealthy alcohol use than those without (p-values <0.05). Adjusted prevalences of resolution were 47% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 42% - 52%) and 48% (95% CI 42% - 54%) for patients with and without documented brief intervention, respectively (p=0.50).Conclusions During early implementation of brief intervention in the U.S. Veterans Health Administration, documented brief intervention was not associated with subsequent changes in drinking among outpatients with unhealthy alcohol use and repeat alcohol screening.
    Addiction 04/2014; 109(9). DOI:10.1111/add.12600 · 4.60 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Clinical documentation, an essential process within electronic health records (EHRs), takes a significant amount of clinician time. How best to optimize documentation methods to deliver effective care remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated whether EHR visit note documentation method was influenced by physician or practice characteristics, and the association of physician satisfaction with an EHR notes module. MEASUREMENTS: We surveyed primary care physicians (PCPs) and specialists, and used EHR and provider data to perform a multinomial logistic regression of visit notes from 2008. We measured physician documentation method use and satisfaction with an EHR notes module and determined the relationship between method and physician and practice characteristics. RESULTS: Of 1088 physicians, 85% used a single method to document the majority of their visits. PCPs predominantly documented using templates (60%) compared to 34% of specialists, while 38% of specialists predominantly dictated. Physicians affiliated with academic medical centers (OR 1.96, CI (1.23, 3.12)), based at a hospital (OR 1.57, 95% CI (1.04, 2.36)) and using the EHR for longer (OR 1.13, 95% CI (1.03, 1.25)) were more likely to dictate than use templates. Most physicians of 383 survey responders were satisfied with the EHR notes module, regardless of their preferred documentation method. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians predominantly utilized a single method of visit note documentation and were satisfied with their approach, but the approaches they chose varied. Demographic characteristics were associated with preferred documentation method. Further research should focus on why variation exists, and the quality of the documentation resulting from different methods used.
    International Journal of Medical Informatics 04/2012; DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.04.002 · 2.72 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Medical ethics is an indispensible and challenging aspect of clinical practice. This is particularly prominent in the field of organ transplantation. In this paper, initially, a clinical case with brain death that ended up as an organ donor will be presented. Following the presentation, important moral challenges which initially formed medical ethics and some highlights of it in organ transplantation will be discussed in detail. The impact of complex modern influential factors that might interfere with the practice of medical ethics in this field such as patients' vulnerability, financial temptations, and legal regulations will be also dealt with. Finally, we shall propose practical guidelines aiming at improving the practice of medical ethics in the emerging issue of organ transplantation.
    11/2011; 4:10.