Biological Adhesion for Locomotion on Rough Surfaces: Basic Principles and A Theorist's View

MRS Bulletin 05/2007; 32(06):486 - 490. DOI: 10.1557/mrs2007.82

ABSTRACT Surface roughness is the main reason why macroscopic solids usually do not adhere to each other with any measurable strength, and a root-mean-square roughness amplitude of only 1 μm is enough to completely remove the adhesion between normal rubber (with an elastic modulus E ≈ 1 MPa) and a hard, nominally flat substrate. Biological adhesion systems used by insects and geckos for locomotion are built from a relatively stiff material (keratin or chitin–protein composite with E ≈ 1 GPa). Nevertheless, strong adhesion is possible even to very rough substrate surfaces by using noncompact solid structures consisting of fibers (setae) and plates (spatulae). Biological systems use a hierarchical building principle, where the thickness of the fibers or plates decreases as one approaches the outer surface of the attachment pad, to optimize the binding to rough surfaces while simultaneously avoiding elastic instabilities, for example, lateral bundling of fibers.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Rove beetles of the genus Stenus possess a unique adhesive prey-capture apparatus that enables them to catch elusive prey such as springtails over a distance of several millimeters. The prey-capture device combines the hierarchically organized morphology of dry adhesive systems with the properties of wet ones, since an adhesive secretion is released into the contact zone. We hypothesize that this combination enables Stenus species successfully to capture prey possessing a wide range of surface structures and chemistries. We have investigated the influence of both surface energy and roughness of the substrate on the adhesive performance of the prey-capture apparatus in two Stenus species. Force transducers have been used to measure both the compressive and adhesive forces generated during the predatory strike of the beetles on (1) epoxy resin surfaces with defined roughness values (smooth versus rough with asperity diameters ranging from 0.3 to 12 μm) and (2) hydrophobic versus hydrophilic glass surfaces. Our experiments show that neither the surface roughness nor the surface energy significantly influences the attachment ability of the prey-capture apparatus. Thus, in contrast to the performance of locomotory adhesive systems in geckos, beetles, and flies, no critical surface roughness exists that might impede adhesion of the prey-capture apparatus of Stenus beetles. The prey-capture apparatus of Stenus beetles is therefore well adapted to adhere to the various unpredictable surfaces with diverse roughness and surface energy occurring in a wide range of potential prey.
    Journal of insect physiology 11/2011; 58(1):155-63. DOI:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.11.001 · 2.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The shear adhesive force of four non-climbing cockroaches (Blatta orientalis Linnaeus, 1758) was investigated by the use of a centrifugal machine, evaluating the shear safety factor (adhesion force divided by body weight) on six surfaces (steel, aluminium, copper, two sandpapers and a common paper sheet) having different roughness. The adhesive system of Blatta orientalis was characterized by means of a field emission scanning electron microscope and the surface roughness was determined by an atomic force microscope. The cockroach maximum shear safety factor, or apparent friction coefficient, is determined to be 12.1 on the less rough of the two sandpapers, while its minimum value is equal to 1.9 on the steel surface. A two-sample Student t analysis has been conducted in order to evaluate the significance of the differences among the obtained shear safety factors due to both roughness and chemistry. An interesting correlation between cockroach shear adhesion and surface roughness emerges with a threshold mechanism dictated by the competition between claw tip radius and roughness, indicating that the best adhesion is obtained for roughness larger than the claw tip radius.
    Meccanica 10/2013; 48(8):1863-1873. DOI:10.1007/s11012-013-9796-6 · 1.82 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many insects, such as flies, ants, and bugs, and some animals, such as tree frogs, have proven able to run up and down on smooth vertical surfaces using their specialized pads via a wet adhesive mechanism. Although many meniscus adhesion models were proposed to reveal the origin of the interfacial force, few studies have investigated the dynamic contact between this kind of bio-adhesive pad and smooth surfaces, which involves not only the initial approaching and adhesion process but more importantly the rapidly releasing process. By a simulation experiment, we found that a micrometer-sized seta of a pad can provide a mNs adhesive force when a ∼ nm thick liquid film is confined in the contact area. Furthermore, based on the observations on the liquid film confined in the contact zone, unstable spreading and shrinking behaviors of the liquid film are found when the volume of confined liquids falls into a critical range and the contact stiffness is very low. The unstable shrinking of the liquid film corresponds to a sharp reduction of adhesive force between the seta and substrate, which are considered as the desired releasing force for a seta to detach from substrate. Experimental observations and analysis allow the conclusion that, to move quickly and effortlessly on a smooth surface, insects may optimize the releasing process by utilizing the unstable shrinking process of the confined liquid thin film. To trigger this, the insects must be able to reduce the seta stiffness or decrease the confined liquid volume.
    Tribology Transactions 02/2010; 53(2):280-287. DOI:10.1080/10402000903402678 · 1.08 Impact Factor


Available from