Interpreting neutral faces as threatening is a default mode for socially anxious individuals

Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, USA.
Journal of Abnormal Psychology (Impact Factor: 4.86). 09/2008; 117(3):680-5. DOI: 10.1037/0021-843X.117.3.680
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The authors of the present study used an incidental learning paradigm to investigate the interpretation of neutral facial expressions in socially anxious individuals. Participants were asked to detect the location of a target following the presentation of a facial picture (i.e., cue). Unbeknownst to participants, the target location was contingent on the valence of the cue, and participants thus learned to associate different target locations with either positive or negative facial expressions. The authors subsequently used this learned association to assess interpretive biases. If socially anxious individuals interpret neutral faces in a negative manner, they should be faster to detect a target that appears in the location that is associated with negative face cues when the target is presented after a neutral face cue. The authors also assessed whether the anticipation of a feared situation influenced interpretive biases by comparing participants with and without a speech threat on this task. Results indicate that socially anxious individuals are characterized by an interpretive bias regardless of the threat manipulation. In contrast, nonanxious individuals interpreted neutral faces in a negative manner only when they were in the threat condition.

Download full-text


Available from: Richard E Zinbarg, Jun 18, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Individuals with pain-related concerns are likely to interpret ambiguous pain-related information in a threatening manner. It is unknown whether this interpretation bias also occurs for ambiguous pain-related facial expressions. This study examined whether individuals who habitually attach a catastrophic meaning to pain are characterized by negative interpretation bias for ambiguous pain-related facial expressions. Sixty-four female undergraduates completed an incidental learning task during which pictures of faces were presented, each followed by a visual target at one of two locations. Participants indicated target location by pressing one of two response keys. During the learning phase, happy and painful facial expressions predicted target location. During two test phases, morphed facial expressions of pain and happiness were added, equally often followed by a target at either location. Faster responses following morphs to targets at the location predicted by painful expressions compared to targets at the location predicted by happy expressions were taken to reflect pain-related interpretation bias. During one test phase, faces were preceded by either a safe or threatening context cue. High, but not low, pain-catastrophizers responded faster following morphs to targets at the location predicted by painful expressions than to targets at the other location (when participants were aware of the contingency between expression type and target location). When context cues were presented, there was no indication of interpretation bias. Participants were also asked to directly classify the facial expressions that were presented during the incidental learning task. Participants classified morphs more often as happy than as painful, independent of their level of pain catastrophizing. This observation is discussed in terms of differences between indirect and direct measures of interpretation bias.
    Frontiers in Psychology 09/2014; 5. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01002 · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Group functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies suggest that anxiety disorders are associated with anomalous brain activation and functional connectivity (FC). However, brain-based features sensitive enough to discriminate individual subjects with a specific anxiety disorder and that track symptom severity longitudinally, desirable qualities for putative disorder-specific biomarkers, remain to be identified. Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI during emotional face perceptual tasks and a new, large-scale and condition-dependent FC and machine learning approach were used to identify features (pair-wise correlations) that discriminated patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD, N=16) from controls (N=19). We assessed whether these features discriminated SAD from panic disorder (PD, N=16), and SAD from controls in an independent replication sample that performed a similar task at baseline (N: SAD=15, controls=17) and following 8-weeks paroxetine treatment (N: SAD=12, untreated controls=7). High SAD vs HCs discrimination (area under the ROC curve, AUC, arithmetic mean of sensitivity and specificity) was achieved with two FC features during unattended neutral face perception (AUC=0.88, P<0.05 corrected). These features also discriminated SAD vs PD (AUC=0.82, P=0.0001) and SAD vs HCs in the independent replication sample (FC during unattended angry face perception, AUC=0.71, P=0.01). The most informative FC was left hippocampus-left temporal pole, which was reduced in both SAD samples (replication sample P=0.027), and this FC increased following the treatment (post>pre, t(11)=2.9, P=0.007). In conclusion, SAD is associated with reduced FC between left temporal pole and left hippocampus during face perception, and results suggest promise for emerging FC-based biomarkers for SAD diagnosis and treatment effects.Neuropsychopharmacology advance online publication, 2 October 2013; doi:10.1038/npp.2013.211.
    Neuropsychopharmacology: official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 08/2013; 39(2). DOI:10.1038/npp.2013.211 · 7.83 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cognitive models of paranoia posit the existence of specific information-processing biases, such as attentional biases, that are related to persecutory beliefs. The nature of these biases remains unclear. Some models propose depression to be at the core of paranoid ideation, while other models propose anxiety. In this study we tested whether attentional biases towards angry or neutral faces were facilitated by 300-ms presentation of an emotional prime word (positive, depressive, paranoid, neutral) in normal participants high in paranoid beliefs (HPB, N = 52) or low in paranoid beliefs (LPB, N = 43). Analyses of first fixation patterns in visual scanpaths revealed that paranoid words made all participants avoid angry faces, though this tendency reached significance only in the LPB group. In contrast, depressive words triggered significant avoidance of angry faces in the HPB group. These findings suggest that activation of depressive cognitive schemas facilitates attentional biases specifically in participants with subclinical paranoia, which would favor the depression-based model of paranoia. We discuss the importance of priming methodologies and visual scan measures for revealing specific cognitive processes in psychopathology and testing competing etiological models of paranoia.
    Cognitive Therapy and Research 03/2012; 7:1-10. DOI:10.1007/s10608-011-9388-5 · 1.33 Impact Factor