Article

Immigrants and the use of preventive care in the United States

Social and Scientific Systems, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
Health Economics (Impact Factor: 2.14). 07/2009; 18(7):783-806. DOI: 10.1002/hec.1401
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Using data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, we compare immigrants' use of preventive care with that of natives. We employ a multinomial switching regression framework that accounts for non-random selection into continuous private insurance, temporary private insurance, public insurance, and no insurance. Our results indicate that among the populations with continuous private coverage and without coverage (uninsured), immigrants, especially non-citizens, are less likely to use preventive care than natives. We find that the longer immigrants stay in the US the more their use of care approximates to that of natives. However, for most types of care, immigrants' use of care never fully converges to that of natives. Among the publicly insured population, immigrants' use of care is similar to natives, but non-citizen immigrants are significantly less likely to use preventive measures. We find that the ability to speak English does not have a significant effect on the use of preventive care among publicly insured persons.

0 Followers
 · 
78 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A large literature documents cross-sectional differences in adult preventive services across population subgroups. Less is known, however, about how these differences have changed over time. This study tracks changes over time in the distribution of preventive services use across groups defined by poverty status, race/ethnicity, insurance coverage, Census region, and urbanicity. Data from the 1996-2008 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey are used to examine 5 preventive services: general checkups, blood pressure screening, blood cholesterol screening, Pap smears, and mammograms. Multivariate logistic regression models of preventive services use are used to compute adjusted utilization for each subgroup of adults aged 19-64 in 1996/1998, 2002/2003, and 2007/2008. We then examine the extent to which percentage point gaps in utilization rates across subgroups have changed between 1996/1998 and 2007/2008. Our analysis of utilization rates across subgroups and over time identified only rare cases in which subgroup differences narrowed or widened between 1996/1998 and 2007/2008. Rather, differences across subgroups tended to persist over time. Some of the largest (adjusted) gaps are between adults with and without coverage, and only for blood cholesterol screening do we observe significant narrowing of the gap between the uninsured and the privately insured. Regional differences persisted or widened over the study period. On the eve of health reform implementation, a key challenge facing the Affordable Care Act will be to address persistent differences in preventive services use within the US population.
    Medical care 09/2013; 51(11). DOI:10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182a97bc0 · 2.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Individuals seeking health care in Senegal face different options in terms of which type of health service to use (public, private or traditional). This article identifies the socio-economic and demographic characteristics that influence health care services in Senegal using a conditional logit model on 8,395 individuals from the second Senegalese Living Standards Survey (ESAM 2). Distance to the provider, type of illness, and length of illness are the main determinants of health providers' use, but individual and household characteristics like location, education, and gender are also significant factors. Contrary to existing literature, I find that household size and household income are not influencing use of a given health care provider versus no care. Additionally, an individual's odds of seeking care from traditional healers increase with the severity and length of the disease.
    African Development Review 03/2014; 26(1). DOI:10.1111/1467-8268.12062 · 0.40 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Immigrant mortality studies reveal conflicting results that were attributed to diversity in immigrant definition, different classifications, and lack of appropriate comparisons. This work studied mortality patterns of the immigrations absorbed in Israel. Short-term mortality was evaluated by comparing the Standardized Mortality Rate (SMR) of the first year after immigration to the SMR of the second to fifth years. Long-term mortality was evaluated by comparing recent immigrant cohorts to cohorts of immigrants who have been residents 5 and 10 years. Stratification was made by source country classification and gender. Data were derived from the Israel National Population Registry and were analyzed anonymously. Immigrants from developed and developing countries had the highest SMR in the first year, which considerably decreased in both short and long term. Immigrants from mid-developed countries had stable SMR in the short term followed by only a modest decrease in the long term. Ethiopian immigrants exhibited exceptionally low SMR in the first year, following which it increased but remained relatively low. Mortality patterns of different immigrant groups differ even under similar definitions, conditions, and period. Only immigrants of developed and developing countries presented the expected pattern of excessive short-term mortality, which consistently decreased with time. Unique mortality patterns were discovered among two groups: Immigrants from mid-developed countries presented stable mortality attributable to isolation and delayed adaptation, and Ethiopian low mortality attributable to pre-migration natural selection.
    Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health 06/2013; 16(1). DOI:10.1007/s10903-013-9858-9 · 1.16 Impact Factor