fMRI of Intrasubject Variability in ADHD: Anomalous Premotor Activity With Prefrontal Compensation

Kennedy Krieger Institute.
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 7.26). 09/2008; 47(10):1141-50. DOI: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181825b1f
Source: PubMed


Children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) consistently display increased intrasubject variability (ISV) in response time across varying tasks, signifying inefficiency of response preparation compared to typically developing (TD) children. Children with ADHD also demonstrate impaired response inhibition; inhibitory deficits correlate with ISV, suggesting that similar brain circuits may underlie both processes. To better understand the neural mechanisms underlying increased ISV and inhibitory deficits in children with ADHD, functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to examine the neural correlates of ISV during Go/No-go task performance.
Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to study 25 children with ADHD and 25 TD children ages 8 to 13 years performing a simplified Go/No-go task. Brain-behavior correlations were examined between functional magnetic resonance imaging activation and ISV within and between groups.
For TD children, increased rostral supplementary motor area (pre-supplementary motor area) activation during No-go events was associated with less ISV, whereas the reverse was true for children with ADHD for whom increased pre-supplementary motor area activation was associated with more ISV. In contrast, children with ADHD with less ISV showed greater prefrontal activation, whereas TD children with more prefrontal activation demonstrated more ISV.
These findings add to evidence that dysfunction of premotor systems may contribute to increased variability and impaired response inhibition in children with ADHD and that compensatory strategies eliciting increased cognitive control may improve function. However, recruitment of prefrontal resources as a compensatory mechanism for motor task performance may preclude the use of those prefrontal resources for higher order, more novel executive functions with which children with ADHD often struggle.

4 Reads
    • "Recently, investigations have examined whether EF can be trained in young children using a play-based approach (Diamond and Lee 2011). It is hypothesized that such EF training interventions promote neural and social development and recent neuroimaging (Rueda et al. 2005; Schulz et al. 2005; Shaw et al. 2006; Suskauer et al. 2008), and neuropsychological (Halperin et al. 2008; Healey et al. 2011) data demonstrate that directed-play EF interventions improve neural functioning. Directed play involves the use of games and activities that are specifically selected and designed to target skills such as inhibitory control, working memory, and motor coordination which are known to be "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Executive functions (EF) are impaired in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It may be especially critical for interventions to target EF in early childhood given the developmental progression of EF deficits that may contribute to later functional impairments. This proof-of-concept study examined the initial efficacy of an intervention program on EF and ADHD. We also examined child performance on three neurocognitive tasks assessing cognitive flexibility, auditory/visual attention, and sustained/selective attention. Children with ADHD (ages 3-7) and their parents were randomized to receive an intervention targeting metacognitive EF deficits (n = 13) or to a waitlist control condition (n = 12). Linear model analysis of covariance compared groups on parent EF ratings, blinded clinician ratings of ADHD symptoms and improvement, and child performance on neurocognitive measures. Children who received the intervention significantly improved on parent ratings of attention shifting and emotion regulation in addition to clinician ratings of inattention. Moderate effect sizes showed additional intervention effects on parent ratings of inhibition, memory, and planning, and clinician ratings of hyperactivity/impulsivity and overall improvement. Small effect sizes were observed for improvement on child neurocognitive measures. Although replication with a larger sample and an active control group is needed, EF training with a metacognitive focus is a potentially promising intervention for young children with ADHD.
    ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders 01/2015; 7(3). DOI:10.1007/s12402-014-0162-x
  • Source
    • "The current results suggest that a large area of the medial frontal cortex exhibits dysfunctional connectivity and atypical support of attentional control in children with ADHD. Previous studies have likewise identified the dMFC as a region with atypical function using both task fMRI (Bush et al., 1999; Christakou et al., 2013; Rubia et al., 2014; Suskauer et al., 2008) and resting state connectivity (Castellanos et al., 2008; Sun et al., 2012; Tian et al., 2006). In addition, structural imaging studies have found that this region is atypical in ADHD (Shaw et al., 2013). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Intra-subject variability (ISV) is the most consistent behavioral deficit in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). ISV may be associated with networks involved in sustaining task control (cingulo-opercular network: CON) and self-reflective lapses of attention (default mode network: DMN). The current study examined whether connectivity supporting attentional control is atypical in children with ADHD. Group differences in full-brain connection strength and brain-behavior associations with attentional control measures were examined for the late-developing CON and DMN in 50 children with ADHD and 50 typically-developing (TD) controls (ages 8-12 years).
    Clinical neuroimaging 11/2014; 7. DOI:10.1016/j.nicl.2014.11.011 · 2.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Our limited sample size and cross-sectional design limit the validity of the findings; however, the feasibility of the design provides a strong foundation from which to build future, longitudinal study paradigms, including investigation of DCD and ADHD subtypes. FC alterations may reflect atypical brain development in children with DCD and / or ADHD and could explain the activation differences frequently observed in task-based fMRI studies ( Booth et al., 2005 ; Durston et al., 2003 ; Durston et al., 2006 ; Kashiwagi et al., 2009 ; Mostofsky et al., 2006 ; Suskauer et al., 2008 ; Zwicker et al. , 2010 , 2011 ). Future research investigating the relationship between FC and task-based fMRI activity is warranted to shed light on how abnormal inter-regional communication may lead to the observed deficits. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) and Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) are prevalent childhood disorders that frequently co-occur. Evidence from neuroimaging research suggests that children with these disorders exhibit disruptions in motor circuitry, which could account for the high rate of co-occurrence. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the functional connections of the motor network in children with DCD and/or ADHD compared to typically developing controls, with the aim of identifying common neurophysiological substrates. Resting-state fMRI was performed on seven children with DCD, 21 with ADHD, 18 with DCD + ADHD and 23 controls. Resting-state connectivity of the primary motor cortex was compared between each group and controls, using age as a co-factor. Relative to controls, children with DCD and/or ADHD exhibited similar reductions in functional connectivity between the primary motor cortex and the bilateral inferior frontal gyri, right supramarginal gyrus, angular gyri, insular cortices, amygdala, putamen, and pallidum. In addition, children with DCD and/or ADHD exhibited different age-related patterns of connectivity, compared to controls. These findings suggest that children with DCD and/or ADHD exhibit disruptions in motor circuitry, which may contribute to problems with motor functioning and attention. Our results support the existence of common neurophysiological substrates underlying both motor and attention problems.
    Clinical neuroimaging 05/2014; 4. DOI:10.1016/j.nicl.2014.03.010 · 2.53 Impact Factor
Show more