Evaluating the evidence: guidelines.

CPM Resource Center, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
AORN journal 09/2008; 88(2):184-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.aorn.2008.04.017
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Guidelines are collections of practical information that assist with clinical decision making. Evidence-based guideline development includes a critique of the quality and an evaluation of the strength of published evidence. Evolution From opinion-based to evidence-based guidelines is incomplete in many of the organizations that author them, so perioperative nurses must become skillful at critiquing guideline development methodologies and clinical content. The AGREE instrument is useful for evaluating guideline development. Nurses have access to evidence-based guidelines registered online through the National Guideline Clearinghouse.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It has been stated that something can be greater than the sum of its parts. This is the case with the current synergistic advancements in both evidence-based practice (EBP) and health information technology (HIT) at the point of care. Some would claim that EBP is leading the way for more meaningful adoption of HIT. Others will credit the advancements in HIT as the reason EBP is now becoming a reality. The greater opportunity for nurses remains in the ability to thoughtfully and boldly leverage the convergence of both as a catalyst in accelerating support to advance practice and technology at the point of care.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper, a multi-user detector based on a Support Vector Machine (SVM) is proposed, which divides the receiving vector into two classes, +1 and -1, to attain detection. Differing from the MMSE detector, the SVM method can find an optimal hyperplane to separate the +1 and -1 from the training data. Simulation results show that under the Rayleigh channel, this detector can achieve a relatively low BER in comparison with the minimum mean square error (MMSE) detector.
    Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2002. Proceedings. 2002 International Conference on; 02/2002
  • Nurse Leader 04/2011; 9(2):31-36. DOI:10.1016/j.mnl.2011.01.001