Subsequent fracture in nursing home residents with a hip fracture: a competing risks approach.

Hebrew SeniorLife, Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts 02131, USA.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (Impact Factor: 3.98). 09/2008; 56(10):1887-92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01918.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To determine the incidence and predictors of subsequent fracture in nursing home residents with a hip fracture, accounting for the competing risk of death.
Dynamic cohort study.
Hebrew Rehabilitation Center, a 725-bed, long-term care facility in Boston, Massachusetts.
Long-term care residents with a surgically repaired hip fracture (1999-2006) followed through June 30, 2007, for the occurrence of subsequent fracture at any skeletal site.
Information on age, sex, anatomic location, type of repair, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, functional status, cognitive status, and medication use were evaluated as potential risk factors for subsequent fracture.
The study included 184 residents with a baseline hip fracture. Thirty-nine residents (7 men, 32 women) experienced a subsequent fracture over a median follow-up of 1.1 years. After the baseline hip fracture, 6% of residents experienced a subsequent fracture within 6 months, 12% within 1 year, and 21% within 5 years. In addition, 23% of residents died within 6 months, 31% within 1 year, and 60% within 5 years. High functional status was associated with a five times greater risk of subsequent fracture (high vs low functional status, hazard ratio=5.10, P<.005). Age, sex, BMI, comorbidities, cognitive status, and medication use were not associated with subsequent fracture.
Hip fractures are a sentinel event in nursing home residents, with a high incidence of subsequent fracture and death occurring within 1 year. Identification of prefracture characteristics and postfracture complications associated with mortality should help guide secondary prevention efforts in nursing home residents.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fractures are one of the most costly consequences of falls in elderly patients in nursing homes. To compare the cost-effectiveness of a 'multifactorial fracture prevention program' provided by a multidisciplinary team with 'no prevention' in newly admitted nursing home residents. We performed a cost-utility analysis using a Markov-based simulation model to establish the effectiveness of a multifaceted fall prevention program from the perspective of statutory health insurance (SHI) and long-term care insurance (LCI). The rate of falls was used to estimate the clinical and economic consequences resulting from hip and upper limb fractures. Robustness of the results was assessed using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Compared to no prevention a multifactorial prevention program for nursing home residents resulted in a cost-effectiveness ratio of 21,353 per quality-adjusted life-year. The total costs for SHI/LCI would result in 1.7 million per year. Results proved to be robust following deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Multifactorial fracture prevention appears to be cost-effective in preventing fractures in nursing home residents. Since the results were based on the number of falls further research is required to confirm the results.
    The European Journal of Health Economics 05/2014; · 2.10 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: CONTEXT: Following fracture there is increased risk of re-fracture and premature mortality. These outcomes, particularly premature mortality following re-fracture, have not previously been studied together to understand overall mortality risk. OBJECTIVES: This study examined the long-term cumulative incidence of subsequent fracture and total mortality with mortality calculated as a compound risk and separated according to initial and re-fracture. DESIGN: Community dwelling participants aged 60+ from Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study with incident fractures, followed prospectively for further fractures and deaths from 1989-2010. OUTCOME MEASURES: Subsequent fracture and mortality ascertained using cumulative incidence competing risk models allowing 4 possible outcomes: death without re-fracture, death following re-fracture, re-fracture but alive and event-free. RESULTS: There were 952 women and 343 men with incident fracture. Within five years following initial fracture, 24% women and 20% men re-fractured; and 26% women and 37% men died without re-fracture. Of those who re-fractured, a further 50% of women and 75% of men died, so total five-year mortality was 39% in women and 51% in men. Excess mortality was 24% in women and 27% in men. While mortality following re-fracture occurred predominantly in the first five years post initial fracture, total mortality (post initial and re-fracture) was elevated for 10 years. Most of the 5-10 year excess mortality was associated with re-fracture. The long term (>10 yr) re-fracture rate was reduced, particularly in the elderly due to their high mortality rate. The 30% alive beyond 10 years post fracture were at low risk of further adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: Re-fractures contribute substantially to overall mortality associated with fracture. The majority of the mortality and re-fractures occurred in the first 5 years following the initial fracture. However, excess mortality was observed for up to 10 years post fracture, predominantly related to that following re-fracture.
    Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 04/2013; · 6.04 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We evaluated vertebral fracture prevalence using DXA-based vertebral fracture assessment and its influence on the Fracture Risk Assessment (FRAX) tool-determined 10-year fracture probability in a cohort of oldest old nursing home residents. More than one third of the subjects had prevalent vertebral fracture and 50% osteoporosis. Probably in relation with the prevailing influence of age and medical history of fracture, adding these information into FRAX did not markedly modify fracture probability. INTRODUCTION: Oldest old nursing home residents are at very high risk of fracture. The prevalence of vertebral fracture in this specific population and its influence on fracture probability using the FRAX tool are not known. METHODS: Using a mobile DXA osteodensitometer, we studied the prevalence of vertebral fracture, as assessed by vertebral fracture assessment program, of osteoporosis and of sarcopenia in 151 nursing home residents. Ten-year fracture probability was calculated using appropriately calibrated FRAX tool. RESULTS: Vertebral fractures were detected in 36% of oldest old nursing home residents (mean age, 85.9 ± 0.6 years). The prevalence of osteoporosis and sarcopenia was 52% and 22%, respectively. Ten-year fracture probability as assessed by FRAX tool was 27% and 15% for major fracture and hip fracture, respectively. Adding BMD or VFA values did not significantly modify it. CONCLUSION: In oldest old nursing home residents, osteoporosis and vertebral fracture were frequently detected. Ten-year fracture probability appeared to be mainly determined by age and clinical risk factors obtained by medical history, rather than by BMD or vertebral fracture.
    Osteoporosis International 02/2012; · 4.04 Impact Factor


Available from