Advertising expenditures in the nursing home sector: Evaluating the need for and purpose of advertising
Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Rural Public Health, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, College Station, Texas, USA.Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives (Impact Factor: 0.73). 07/2008; 53(4):242-55; discussion 255-6.
Marketing and advertising activities in the nursing home sector have increased in recent years, following the example of hospitals and health systems. The reasons for this trend may be related to the growth in competition but are not clearly identified yet. Theoretically, advertising becomes necessary to gain an advantage over the competition. The purpose of this study was to identify the reasons for the variation in advertising expenditures among nursing homes in Texas. For this study, we merged 2003 data from the Texas Medicaid Nursing Facility Cost Report, the Texas Nursing Home Quality Reporting System, and the Area Resource File for Texas. Using the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, we then examined the correlations between advertising expenses and the level of market concentration. We evaluated the association between advertising expenditures and market competition using two logistic and four linear regression models. Total advertising expenses in Texas nursing homes ranged from $0 to $165,000 per year. Higher advertising expenditures were associated with larger facilities, higher occupancy, and high Medicare census. Market competition, however, was not a significant predictor of such expenses. Advertising seems to be more resource-driven than market-driven. Therefore, some advertising expenditures may be unnecessary, may lack impact, and may even be wasteful. Reducing unnecessary advertising costs could free up resources, which may be allocated to necessary resident care activities.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: High turnover of nursing assistants (NAs) has implications for the quality of nursing home care. Greater understanding of correlates of NA turnover is needed to provide insight into possible retention strategies. This study examined nursing home organizational characteristics and specific job characteristics of staff in relation to turnover of NAs. Cross-sectional data on 944 nationally representative nursing homes were derived from the 2004 National Nursing Home Survey. Using a 3-month turnover rate, 25% of the facilities with the lowest turnover rates were classified as low turnover, 25% of the facilities with the highest turnover were classified as high turnover, and the remaining 50% of the facilities were classified as moderate turnover. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine organizational and job characteristics associated with low and high turnover compared with moderate turnover. One organizational characteristic, staffing levels at or greater than 4.0 hours per patient day, was associated with greater odds of low NA turnover and reduced odds of high NA turnover. Job characteristics including higher wages and union membership were associated with greater odds of low NA turnover, whereas wages, fully paid health insurance, employee assistance benefits, and involvement in resident care planning were associated with reduced odds of high NA turnover. The results of this study suggest that job characteristics of NA staff may be particularly important for turnover. Specifically, the provision of competitive wages and benefits (particularly health insurance) and involvement of NAs in resident care planning could potentially reduce NA turnover, as could maintaining high levels of nurse staffing.Health care management review 04/2009; 34(2):182-90. DOI:10.1097/HMR.0b013e31819c8b11 · 1.30 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Today, long-term care facilities are composed of independent, assisted living, and skilled nursing facilities along with many variations of those themes in between. The clientele for these various types of facilities differ because of the level of care the facility provides as well as the amenities long-term care consumers are looking for. However, there many similarities and common approaches to how reaching the target audience through effective marketing activities. Knowing who the target audience is, how to reach them, and how to communicate with them will serve any facility well in this competitive market. Developing marketing strategies for long-term care settings is as important as understanding what elements of care can be marketed individually as a niche market. Determining the market base for a facility is equally crucial since the target populations differ among the three types of facilities. By reviewing current marketing articles and applying marketing practices, we have crafted some general principles for which each facility type can learn from. Finally, we will discuss the types of marketing and how they related to the spectrum of long-term care facilities.Health Marketing Quarterly 04/2010; 27(2):145-54. DOI:10.1080/07359681003745071
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Conventional economic principles suggest that increases in competition are associated with price decreases. The purpose of this study is to determine whether this association holds true between objective measures of hospital competition and gross charges, by analyzing standardized operations where variations in costs should be minimal. Hospital Market Structure file (from Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, available for years 2000 and 2003) was linked to Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Appendectomy, carotid endarterectomy, bariatric surgery, radical prostatectomy, and pyloromyotomy were analyzed, after excluding patients with possible complications. Primary outcomes included total hospital charges. Primary independent variable was Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) calculated by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality for each hospital based on its patient-flow market. Higher HHI represents the presence of more dominant hospitals in the market or lower competition. A total of 162,823 patients from 1,492 hospitals (85,791 appendectomies, 38,619 carotid endarterectomies, 18,383 bariatric operations, 16,784 radical prostatectomies, 3,246 pyloromyotomies) were analyzed. Single linear regression analyses demonstrated higher HHI was significantly associated with lower hospital gross charges in all cases. On multivariate analysis, a 1 percentage-point increase on HHI was associated with -$114 for appendectomy, -$163 for carotid endarterectomy, and -$193 for radical prostatectomy (all p ≤ 0.001), and were independent of hospital urbanicity, teaching status, and payer mix. In contrast, no association was found between competition and hospital costs. Higher level of hospital competition is associated with higher hospital gross charges, although competition intensity is not associated with hospital costs. These data are important as health policy makers consider possible cost-control measures.Journal of the American College of Surgeons 01/2011; 212(1):12-9. DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.014 · 5.12 Impact Factor