Article

HIV-2 integrase gene polymorphism and phenotypic susceptibility of HIV-2 clinical isolates to the integrase inhibitors raltegravir and elvitegravir in vitro.

AP-HP, Groupe hospitalier Bichat-Claude Bernard, Laboratoire de Virologie, Paris F-75018, France.
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (Impact Factor: 5.34). 09/2008; 62(5):914-20. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkn335
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We investigated the in vitro phenotypic susceptibility of HIV-2 isolates from integrase inhibitor (INI)-naive patients to INIs and its relation to HIV-2 integrase gene polymorphism.
We determined the phenotypic susceptibility to raltegravir and elvitegravir of co-cultured isolates obtained from the HIV-2 ROD reference strain and from 14 clinical isolates. IC(50) values were compared with those for HIV-1 reference strains. HIV-2 integrase gene polymorphism was assessed in isolates from 52 INI-naive patients enrolled in the French HIV-2 cohort.
Median raltegravir and elvitegravir IC(50) values for the 14 clinical HIV-2 isolates were 2.4 and 0.7 nM, respectively, and were similar to those observed for HIV-2 ROD and HIV-1 reference strains. Overall, 38% of HIV-2 integrase amino acids were polymorphic. The catalytic triad DDE and the HHCC and RKK motifs were fully conserved, at the same genomic positions as described in HIV-1. In subtype B isolates, the total length of the integrase gene varied, owing to the presence of stop codons at positions 288, 294, 297 and 302. Fourteen of the positions associated with substitutions conferring INI resistance in HIV-1 were polymorphic in HIV-2.
Despite 40% heterogeneity between the HIV-1 and HIV-2 integrase genes, the phenotypic susceptibility of clinical HIV-2 isolates to INIs was similar to that of HIV-1. This new class of antiretroviral drugs thus represents a novel therapeutic possibility for HIV-2-infected patients who otherwise have few treatment options.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
102 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The distribution and evolution of X4/R5 viral tropism during HIV-2 infection remains unknown. HIV-2 tropism was assessed in 83 antiretroviral-experienced patients with virological failure. Tropism was predicted as X4 in 58% of patients and was associated with a CD4 cell count of less than 100 cells/μl, and with a higher number of drug resistance mutations. This high prevalence of X4 virus might compromise the use of CCR5 inhibitors, currently mostly considered in HIV-2 salvage therapy of highly pretreated patients.
    AIDS (London, England) 09/2014; 28(14):2160-2162. DOI:10.1097/QAD.0000000000000373 · 6.56 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Although endemic in West Africa, HIV-2 infection dissemination is limited to about 1.2 million people worldwide. However, the prevalence of HIV-2 infection is in Portugal disproportionately high, similarly to other countries with strong socioeconomic ties with West African former colonies. Due to HIV-2 intrinsic resistance to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (non-NRTIs) and enfuvirtide, along with reduced susceptibility to several of the protease inhibitors (PI), antiretroviral therapy (ART) relies on a regimen containing two NRTIs and a selected boosted PI. The integrase inhibitor raltegravir (RAL) showed, in vitro, activity against HIV-2 infection, and small case series published report RAL efficacy in the treatment of HIV-2 infection. Methods: We report eight HIV-2 ART-experienced patients treated with a RAL-containing regimen. Results: In this small series of eight patients, medium time of known HIV-2 infection before RAL introduction was 9.4 years; all had previous exposition to ART, some with more than 3 past therapeutic regimens. The majority had low CD4+T cell count. Despite these clinical aspects, the majority showed undetectable viral load (75%) and improvement or stability of the CD4+ T cell count (63%). Conclusion: Despite limitations inherent to this small case series, RAL proved to be useful in the treatment of HIV-2 infected patients, with beneficial effect in virus control and CD4+T cell preservation. In the presence of extensive resistance to other antiretrovirals, the benefit of RAL seems to be decreased. Accordingly to other emergent data, RAL may represent a novel therapeutic possibility for HIV-2 infected patients.
    10/2014; 2(2). DOI:10.9734/IJMPCR/2015/13078
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Human Immunodeficiency Virus-type 2 (HIV-2) encodes Vpx that degrades SAMHD1, a cellular restriction factor active in non-dividing cells. HIV-2 replicates in lymphocytes but the susceptibility of monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs) to in vitro infection remains partly characterized.ResultsHere, we investigated HIV-2 replication in primary CD4+ T lymphocytes, both activated and non-activated, as well as in MDDCs. We focused on the requirement of Vpx for productive HIV-2 infection, using the reference HIV-2 ROD strain, the proviral clone GL-AN, as well as two primary HIV-2 isolates. All HIV-2 strains tested replicated in activated CD4+ T cells. Unstimulated CD4+ T cells were not productively infected by HIV-2, but viral replication was triggered upon lymphocyte activation in a Vpx-dependent manner. In contrast, MDDCs were poorly infected when exposed to HIV-2. HIV-2 particles did not potently fuse with MDDCs and did not lead to efficient viral DNA synthesis, even in the presence of Vpx. Moreover, the HIV-2 strains tested were not efficiently sensed by MDDCs, as evidenced by a lack of MxA induction upon viral exposure. Virion pseudotyping with VSV-G rescued fusion, productive infection and HIV-2 sensing by MDDCs.Conclusion Vpx allows the non-productive infection of resting CD4+ T cells, but does not confer HIV-2 with the ability to efficiently infect MDDCs. In these cells, an entry defect prevents viral fusion and reverse transcription independently of SAMHD1. We propose that HIV-2, like HIV-1, does not productively infect MDDCs, possibly to avoid triggering an immune response mediated by these cells.
    Retrovirology 01/2015; 12(1):2. DOI:10.1186/PREACCEPT-2035398010150355 · 4.77 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
0 Downloads
Available from