Single versus multiple visits for endodontic treatment of permanent teeth: a Cochrane systematic review.

Dipartimento di Medicina, Chirurgia Odontoiatria, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Journal of endodontics (Impact Factor: 2.79). 10/2008; 34(9):1041-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.06.009
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The Cochrane Collaboration promotes evidence-based healthcare decision making globally through systematic reviews of the effects of healthcare intervention. The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate whether the effectiveness and frequency of short-term and long-term complications are different when endodontic procedure is completed in one or multiple visits. Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials enrolling patients undergoing endodontic treatment were identified by searching biomedical databases and hand-searching relevant journals. The following outcomes were considered: tooth extraction as a result of endodontic problems and radiologic failure after 1 year, postoperative discomfort, swelling, analgesic use, or sinus track. Twelve studies were included in the review. No detectable difference was found in the effectiveness of root canal treatment in terms of radiologic success between single and multiple visits. Neither single-visit root canal treatment nor multiple-visit root canal treatment can prevent 100% of short-term and long-term complications. Patients undergoing a single visit might experience a slightly higher frequency of swelling and refer significantly more analgesic use.


Available from: Giovanni Lodi, May 22, 2015
1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: One-appointment procedure is an endodontic therapy protocol that has been growing in popularity among clinicians and patients. It definitely brings many advantages in clinical management and in relating to the patients’ needs.Whenaccepting a one-appointment procedure the clinician assumes that the long term prognosis mirrors the multi-appointment procedure. The aim of thiswork is to analyze and evaluate if this assumption is correct when bacterial infection is present. The relevant literature on one-appointment versus multiappointment endodontic treatment on teeth with apical periodontitis up to December of 2010 was reviewed using PubMed database searches. The literature was searched regarding the following topics: periapical healing, bacterial elimination, histological studies, bacterial endotoxins elimination and post-operative pain. An analysis of the treatment protocol and concept differences between both treatments and an overall discussion are also presented. There is a general agreement on the need of an effective bacteriological control. Although more studies are required to support the one- versus multiple-appointment procedure.
    09/2011; 52(3):181-186. DOI:10.1016/j.rpemd.2011.04.002
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine both associated with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 0.5% bupivacaine associated with 1:200,000 epinephrine in patients with irreversible pulpitis of the mandibular molars during a pulpectomy procedure. Methods: One hundred and five volunteers from the Emergency Center of the School of Dentistry at University of São Paulo randomly received 3.6 ml of local anesthetic as a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). The subjective signal of lip numbness, pulpal anesthesia and the absence of pain during the pulpectomy procedure were, respectively, evaluated by questioning the patient, stimulation using an electric pulp tester and a verbal analogue scale. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test. The level for significance of differences was P ≤ .05. Results: All patients reported the subjective signal of lip numbness after the application of either inferior alveolar nerve block. Lidocaine demonstrated higher scores (42.9%) for pulpal anesthesia than articaine (37.1%) and bupivacaine (20%). For patients who reported no pain or mild pain during the pulpectomy, bupivacaine had a higher success rate (80%) than articaine (62.9%) and lidocaine (57.1%). These differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Therefore, the three local anesthetic solutions behave similarly and do not provide 100% anesthetic success in patients with irreversible pulpitis of the mandibular molars.
    IADR General Session and Exhibition 2014; 06/2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This review defines evidence-based practice and discusses how the concept has been applied to endodontics. The focus is on treatment procedures in endodontics. The means used in the process and how far our knowledge base has reached are addressed. Aspects are also conveyed as to what future research in clinical endodontics should take into account.
    Endodontic Topics 11/2014; 31(1). DOI:10.1111/etp.12065