Replicability of an epibenthic sampler

Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK (Impact Factor: 1.02). 01/1991; 71(01):153 - 166. DOI: 10.1017/S0025315400037462

ABSTRACT Hyperbenthos was sampled at six stations on the western slope of the Norwegian Trough. Four hauls, two day and two night replicates were taken at each station. The replicates were analyzed based on all sampled individuals of Mysidacea and Decapoda Natantia using Shannon diversity index, Spearman rank correlation, G-test, Bray-Curtis similarity index and Correspondence Analysis. The sampler provided samples of mysids and shrimps with an acceptable level of replicability based on number of individuals and diversity. In a cost-efficient context it is satisfactory to take only one sample at a station.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A thorough literature review has been undertaken to establish the first complete account of polychaetes recorded from the area around the volcanic island of Jan Mayen. The annotated checklist lists 121 species-level taxa, representing an increase from the 75 species previously recorded. The checklist is based on existing records, supplemented with material sampled in 1999, from which 42 species new to the area were reported. Some previously reported species from the area have been excluded because of inadequate documentation. The polychaete fauna of Jan Mayen is comparable with that of the mainland Norwegian coast and the Svalbard area. No taxa unique to the island were found. However, knowledge of the marine invertebrate fauna in general at Jan Mayen is sparse because few surveys have been undertaken there. It is expected that future expeditions will reveal further new taxon records for the area.
    Polar Research 03/2010; 29(1):1 - 21. · 1.62 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Six species of Ophelina Ørsted, 1843 have been identified in an extensive material covering 145 localities from 575 to 3900 m depth in the Nordic Seas. Ophelina opisthobranchiata Wirén, 1901 and O. helgolandiae Augener, 1912 were recorded for the first time since their original description about a century ago. O. opisthobranchiata was the most abundant species with more than 18,000 collected specimens. It was recorded between 800 and 3900 m depth and was the only species of Ophelina found deeper than 2000 m. Ophelina cylindricaudata (Hansen, 1879) and Ophelina abranchiata Støp-Bowitz, 1948 were both widespread from 600 to about 2000 m depth. A new species, Ophelina brattegardi sp. nov., is described from off East Greenland, and another presumably new species, Ophelina ‘B’, from shelf break areas off western Norway is diagnosed but not formally described due to insufficient material. O. cylindricaudata and O. abranchiata are redescribed based on type material and newly collected specimens. Ammotrypane minuta Annenkova, 1952 from deep water in the Greenland Sea is newly synonymised with Ophelina helgolandiae. Descriptions are also provided for O. opisthobranchiata and O. helgolandiae. The present study illustrates the importance of examining a relatively large amount of specimens in order to correctly establish characters of fragile structures such as branchiae and anal tube. It is also shown that the number of setigers is stable for all recorded species and consequently represents a character of taxonomic importance.
    Italian Journal of Zoology 01/2011; · 0.89 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since 1993 Cerithiella danielsseni (Friele, 1877) has been regarded as a variety of C. metula (Lovén, 1846). An argument is made for reinstating C. danielsseni as a valid taxon inhabiting below-zero waters on the slope around the Nordic Seas. This conclusion is based on lack of overlap in shell morphology between specimens found below and above the ecotone where the thermocline meets the slope. Just above the ecotone and also in the Barents Sea north of ~72°N, the shelf species C. metula occurs, but with morphology slightly modified from that of the ‘typical’ form.
    Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK 01/2010; 90(04):819-826. · 1.02 Impact Factor